John Kiely1, Mayank Kumar2, Ryckie G Wade3. 1. Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Bradford Teaching Hospitals Trust, Bradford, UK. Electronic address: john.kiely@bthft.nhs.uk. 2. Department of Trauma & Orthopaedics, Leeds Teaching Hospitals Trust, Leeds, UK. 3. Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Leeds Teaching Hospitals Trust, Leeds, UK; Leeds Institute for Medical Research, The University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Perforator mapping may be performed prior to deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flap breast reconstruction to guide perforator selection. However, the accuracy of different imaging modalities remains unknown. This review aimed to evaluate the accuracy of different modalities for locating perforators for unipedicled DIEP flap breast reconstruction. METHODS: MEDLINE and EMBASE were searched from inception to 24th September 2019 for studies concerning adult women undergoing DIEP flap breast reconstruction with preoperative perforator mapping. The index test was pre-operative imaging and the reference standard was intraoperative identification. RESULTS: 21 articles with 1146 women were included. Six methods were described; handheld doppler, colour doppler (duplex) ultrasonography, computed tomography angiography, magnetic resonance angiography (MRA), direct infrared thermography with and without doppler. Meta-analysis revealed 94% (95% CI 88-99%) of DIEPs identified as the 'dominant perforator' on imaging were chosen as dominant perforators intraoperatively. Colour doppler (Duplex) ultrasonography had the lowest agreement (mean 74% [95% CI 67-81%]) whilst MRA had the highest agreement (mean 97% [95% CI 86-100%]). There was no statistically significant difference in the performance of different tests. All studies were subject to bias as the operators had knowledge of the index test prior to conducting the reference standard. CONCLUSIONS: Based upon limited evidence, cross sectional (CT/MR) imaging modalities for preoperative DIEP mapping appear to have similar accuracy and perform better than ultrasound.
BACKGROUND: Perforator mapping may be performed prior to deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flap breast reconstruction to guide perforator selection. However, the accuracy of different imaging modalities remains unknown. This review aimed to evaluate the accuracy of different modalities for locating perforators for unipedicled DIEP flap breast reconstruction. METHODS: MEDLINE and EMBASE were searched from inception to 24th September 2019 for studies concerning adult women undergoing DIEP flap breast reconstruction with preoperative perforator mapping. The index test was pre-operative imaging and the reference standard was intraoperative identification. RESULTS: 21 articles with 1146 women were included. Six methods were described; handheld doppler, colour doppler (duplex) ultrasonography, computed tomography angiography, magnetic resonance angiography (MRA), direct infrared thermography with and without doppler. Meta-analysis revealed 94% (95% CI 88-99%) of DIEPs identified as the 'dominant perforator' on imaging were chosen as dominant perforators intraoperatively. Colour doppler (Duplex) ultrasonography had the lowest agreement (mean 74% [95% CI 67-81%]) whilst MRA had the highest agreement (mean 97% [95% CI 86-100%]). There was no statistically significant difference in the performance of different tests. All studies were subject to bias as the operators had knowledge of the index test prior to conducting the reference standard. CONCLUSIONS: Based upon limited evidence, cross sectional (CT/MR) imaging modalities for preoperative DIEP mapping appear to have similar accuracy and perform better than ultrasound.