Nabela Enam1, Akhila Veerubhotla2,3, Naphtaly Ehrenberg2, Steven Kirshblum3,4,5, Karen J Nolan2,3, Rakesh Pilkar2,3. 1. Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA. 2. Center for Mobility and Rehabilitation Engineering Research, Kessler Foundation, West Orange, NJ, USA. 3. Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Rutgers - New Jersey Medical School, Newark, NJ, USA. 4. Center for Spinal Stimulation Research, Kessler Foundation, West Orange, NJ, USA. 5. Spinal Cord Rehabilitation, Kessler Institute for Rehabilitation, West Orange, NJ, USA.
Abstract
Objective: To provide a proof-of-concept for a novel stroke-gait-specific augmented reality (AR)-guided treadmill intervention by evaluating its effect on temporospatial and functional outcomes of mobility. Methods: Two females with hemiplegia post stroke were recruited for participation in a 4-week intervention, and a single healthy control was recruited for baseline comparisons. The stroke-intervention (SI) participant (aged 54-years), completed 12 sessions of AR-guided treadmill intervention. The stroke-control (SC) participant (aged 59-years) completed 12 sessions of conventional treadmill intervention. Temporospatial and functional mobility were assessed pre-intervention, post-intervention, and at 1-month follow-up. Physical ACtivity Enjoyment Scale (PACES) was administered post-intervention. Results: The SI participant showed clinically meaningful improvements in functional outcomes post-intervention and at 1-month follow-up (Berg balance score (BBS): +6 and +10 points; Dynamic Gait Index (DGI): +2 at post-intervention only; walking speed: +0.19 and +0.24 m/s; 6-minute walk test (6MWT): +51.9 and +38.9) respectively. The SC showed clinically meaningful improvements in BBS (+3 and +3) and walking speed (+0.06 at post-intervention). The PACES scores showed that the SI participant had a significantly higher (23 points) enjoyment level during the intervention compared to the SC participant. The SI participant was more asymmetric compared to the SC participant at pre and post-intervention visits.Conclusions: The SI participant showed greater improvement in functional assessments compared to the SC participant post intervention. The AR-guided approach may have added benefits compared to traditional treadmill training, while providing better customization, patient enjoyment, and engagement. Further investigation with a larger sample is warranted.
Objective: To provide a proof-of-concept for a novel stroke-gait-specific augmented reality (AR)-guided treadmill intervention by evaluating its effect on temporospatial and functional outcomes of mobility. Methods: Two females with hemiplegia post stroke were recruited for participation in a 4-week intervention, and a single healthy control was recruited for baseline comparisons. The stroke-intervention (SI) participant (aged 54-years), completed 12 sessions of AR-guided treadmill intervention. The stroke-control (SC) participant (aged 59-years) completed 12 sessions of conventional treadmill intervention. Temporospatial and functional mobility were assessed pre-intervention, post-intervention, and at 1-month follow-up. Physical ACtivity Enjoyment Scale (PACES) was administered post-intervention. Results: The SI participant showed clinically meaningful improvements in functional outcomes post-intervention and at 1-month follow-up (Berg balance score (BBS): +6 and +10 points; Dynamic Gait Index (DGI): +2 at post-intervention only; walking speed: +0.19 and +0.24 m/s; 6-minute walk test (6MWT): +51.9 and +38.9) respectively. The SC showed clinically meaningful improvements in BBS (+3 and +3) and walking speed (+0.06 at post-intervention). The PACES scores showed that the SI participant had a significantly higher (23 points) enjoyment level during the intervention compared to the SC participant. The SI participant was more asymmetric compared to the SC participant at pre and post-intervention visits.Conclusions: The SI participant showed greater improvement in functional assessments compared to the SC participant post intervention. The AR-guided approach may have added benefits compared to traditional treadmill training, while providing better customization, patient enjoyment, and engagement. Further investigation with a larger sample is warranted.