Objective: Preterm birth represents a significant medical event that places infants at a markedly greater risk for neurodevelopmental problems and delays. Although the impact of medical factors on neurodevelopment for those born preterm has been thoroughly explored, less is known about how social-environmental factors (e.g., socioeconomic status, family functioning) moderate outcomes. This review explores the quantity and methodological rigor of research on social-environmental factors as moderators of the relationship between preterm birth and neurodevelopmental outcomes. Methods: Articles published between January 1980 and December 2016 were identified from a comprehensive meta-analysis and systematic review on neurodevelopmental outcomes following preterm birth. A systematic review of MEDLINE was conducted to identify articles published from January 2017 through April 2019. Results: Eighty articles met the inclusion criteria. The majority of studies matched preterm and control groups on social-environmental factors (n = 49). The remaining studies included social-environmental factors as moderators (n = 13) or correlates (n = 11) of neurodevelopmental outcomes. Only seven studies did not include reports on social-environmental factors.Conclusions: This systematic review suggests that social-environmental factors are often considered to be ancillary risk factors to the larger medical risk imparted by prematurity. Studies typically focused on socioeconomic status rather than more modifiable parent/family factors that can be targeted through intervention (e.g., parental mental health) and evidenced mixed findings regarding the significance of social-environmental factors as moderators. Further research is needed to identify the relative influence of social-environmental factors to inform future psychosocial interventions.
Objective: Preterm birth represents a significant medical event that places infants at a markedly greater risk for neurodevelopmental problems and delays. Although the impact of medical factors on neurodevelopment for those born preterm has been thoroughly explored, less is known about how social-environmental factors (e.g., socioeconomic status, family functioning) moderate outcomes. This review explores the quantity and methodological rigor of research on social-environmental factors as moderators of the relationship between preterm birth and neurodevelopmental outcomes. Methods: Articles published between January 1980 and December 2016 were identified from a comprehensive meta-analysis and systematic review on neurodevelopmental outcomes following preterm birth. A systematic review of MEDLINE was conducted to identify articles published from January 2017 through April 2019. Results: Eighty articles met the inclusion criteria. The majority of studies matched preterm and control groups on social-environmental factors (n = 49). The remaining studies included social-environmental factors as moderators (n = 13) or correlates (n = 11) of neurodevelopmental outcomes. Only seven studies did not include reports on social-environmental factors.Conclusions: This systematic review suggests that social-environmental factors are often considered to be ancillary risk factors to the larger medical risk imparted by prematurity. Studies typically focused on socioeconomic status rather than more modifiable parent/family factors that can be targeted through intervention (e.g., parental mental health) and evidenced mixed findings regarding the significance of social-environmental factors as moderators. Further research is needed to identify the relative influence of social-environmental factors to inform future psychosocial interventions.
Entities:
Keywords:
Preterm; cognitive functioning; neurodevelopmental outcomes; parent and family functioning; socioeconomic status
Authors: M Hirvonen; R Ojala; P Korhonen; P Haataja; K Eriksson; K Rantanen; M Gissler; T Luukkaala; O Tammela Journal: J Intellect Disabil Res Date: 2017-07-11
Authors: M S Kramer; L Goulet; J Lydon; L Séguin; H McNamara; C Dassa; R W Platt; M F Chen; H Gauthier; J Genest; S Kahn; M Libman; R Rozen; A Masse; L Miner; G Asselin; A Benjamin; J Klein; G Koren Journal: Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol Date: 2001-07 Impact factor: 3.980