Literature DB >> 33342242

Cost-Effectiveness of Initiating Pharmacological Treatment in Stage One Hypertension Based on 10-Year Cardiovascular Disease Risk: A Markov Modeling Study.

Margaret Constanti1, Christopher N Floyd2, Mark Glover3, Rebecca Boffa1, Anthony S Wierzbicki4, Richard J McManus5.   

Abstract

Antihypertensive drug treatment is cost-effective for adults at high risk of developing cardiovascular disease (CVD). However, the cost-effectiveness in people with stage 1 hypertension (140-159 mm Hg systolic blood pressure) at lower CVD risk remains unclear. The objective was to establish the 10-year CVD risk threshold where initiating antihypertensive drug treatment for primary prevention in adults, with stage 1 hypertension, becomes cost-effective. A lifetime horizon Markov model compared antihypertensive drug versus no treatment, using a UK National Health Service perspective. Analyses were conducted for groups ranging between 5% and 20% 10-year CVD risk. Health states included no CVD event, CVD and non-CVD death, and 6 nonfatal CVD morbidities. Interventions were compared using cost-per-quality-adjusted life-years. The base-case age was 60, with analyses repeated between ages 40 and 75. The model was run separately for men and women, and threshold CVD risk assessed against the minimum plausible risk for each group. Treatment was cost-effective at 10% CVD risk for both sexes (incremental cost-effectiveness ratio £10 017/quality-adjusted life-year [$14 542] men, £8635/QALY [$12 536] women) in the base-case. The result was robust in probabilistic and deterministic sensitivity analyses but was sensitive to treatment effects. Treatment was cost-effective for men regardless of age and women aged >60. Initiating treatment in stage 1 hypertension for people aged 60 is cost-effective regardless of 10-year CVD risk. For other age groups, it is also cost-effective to treat regardless of risk, except in younger women.

Entities:  

Keywords:  blood pressure; cardiovascular diseases; economic model; primary prevention; quality-adjusted life-year

Year:  2020        PMID: 33342242      PMCID: PMC7803450          DOI: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.120.14913

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hypertension        ISSN: 0194-911X            Impact factor:   10.190


  27 in total

1.  Synergistic acceleration of arterial stiffening in the presence of raised blood pressure and raised plasma glucose.

Authors:  Hirofumi Tomiyama; Hideki Hashimoto; Yoji Hirayama; Minoru Yambe; Jiko Yamada; Yutaka Koji; Kazuki Shiina; Yoshio Yamamoto; Akira Yamashina
Journal:  Hypertension       Date:  2005-12-27       Impact factor: 10.190

2.  Incidence and aetiology of heart failure; a population-based study.

Authors:  M R Cowie; D A Wood; A J Coats; S G Thompson; P A Poole-Wilson; V Suresh; G C Sutton
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 29.983

3.  Hypertension in adults: summary of updated NICE guidance.

Authors:  Rebecca J Boffa; Margaret Constanti; Christopher N Floyd; Anthony S Wierzbicki
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2019-10-21

4.  The 2018 ESC/ESH hypertension guideline and the 2019 NICE hypertension guideline, how and why they differ.

Authors:  Terry McCormack; Rebecca J Boffa; Nicholas R Jones; Serena Carville; Richard J McManus
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2019-11-01       Impact factor: 29.983

5.  Improvement in Cardiovascular Risk Prediction with Electronic Health Records.

Authors:  Mindy M Pike; Paul A Decker; Nicholas B Larson; Jennifer L St Sauver; Paul Y Takahashi; Véronique L Roger; Walter A Rocca; Virginia M Miller; Janet E Olson; Jyotishman Pathak; Suzette J Bielinski
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Transl Res       Date:  2016-03-09       Impact factor: 4.132

6.  Investigation and Treatment of High Blood Pressure in Young People: Too Much Medicine or Appropriate Risk Reduction?

Authors:  Thomas C Hinton; Zoe H Adams; Richard P Baker; Katrina A Hope; Julian F R Paton; Emma C Hart; Angus K Nightingale
Journal:  Hypertension       Date:  2019-11-18       Impact factor: 10.190

7.  Association of traditional risk factors with cardiovascular death across 0 to 10, 10 to 20, and >20 years follow-up in men and women.

Authors:  Jarett D Berry; Alan Dyer; Mercedes Carnethon; Lu Tian; Philip Greenland; Donald M Lloyd-Jones
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  2008-01-01       Impact factor: 2.778

8.  The economic burden of tuberous sclerosis complex in UK patients with renal manifestations: a retrospective cohort study in the clinical practice research datalink (CPRD).

Authors:  John C Kingswood; Paola Nasuti; Keyur Patel; Melissa Myland; Vathani Siva; Elizabeth Gray
Journal:  J Med Econ       Date:  2016-06-25       Impact factor: 2.448

9.  Prediction of individualized lifetime benefit from cholesterol lowering, blood pressure lowering, antithrombotic therapy, and smoking cessation in apparently healthy people.

Authors:  Nicole E M Jaspers; Michael J Blaha; Kunihiro Matsushita; Yvonne T van der Schouw; Nicholas J Wareham; Kay-Tee Khaw; Marie H Geisel; Nils Lehmann; Raimund Erbel; Karl-Heinz Jöckel; Yolanda van der Graaf; W M Monique Verschuren; Jolanda M A Boer; Vijay Nambi; Frank L J Visseren; Jannick A N Dorresteijn
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2020-03-14       Impact factor: 35.855

10.  Development and validation of QRISK3 risk prediction algorithms to estimate future risk of cardiovascular disease: prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Julia Hippisley-Cox; Carol Coupland; Peter Brindle
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2017-05-23
View more
  3 in total

1.  Identification of Health Expenditures Determinants: A Model to Manage the Economic Burden of Cardiovascular Disease.

Authors:  Fiorella Pia Salvatore; Alessia Spada; Francesca Fortunato; Demetris Vrontis; Mariantonietta Fiore
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-04-27       Impact factor: 3.390

2.  Telemonitoring and Case Management for Hypertensive and Remote-Dwelling Patients With Chronic Kidney Disease-The Telemonitoring for Improved Kidney Outcomes Study (TIKO): A Clinical Research Protocol.

Authors:  Ikechi G Okpechi; Deenaz Zaidi; Feng Ye; Miriam Fradette; Kara Schick-Makaroff; Charlotte Berendonk; Abdullah Abdulrahman; Branko Braam; Anukul Ghimire; Vinash Kumar Hariramani; Kailash Jindal; Maryam Khan; Scott Klarenbach; Shezel Muneer; Jennifer Ringrose; Nairne Scott-Douglas; Soroush Shojai; Dan Slabu; Naima Sultana; Mohammed M Tinwala; Stephanie Thompson; Raj Padwal; Aminu K Bello
Journal:  Can J Kidney Health Dis       Date:  2022-02-13

Review 3.  Comparison between the world health organization (WHO) and international society of hypertension (ISH) guidelines for hypertension.

Authors:  Pringgodigdo Nugroho; Hubert Andrew; Kelvin Kohar; Chairina Azkya Noor; Aida Lydia Sutranto
Journal:  Ann Med       Date:  2022-12       Impact factor: 4.709

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.