Yeliz Celik1, Erik Thunström2, Patrick J Strollo3, Yüksel Peker4. 1. Koc University Research Center for Translational Medicine (KUTTAM), Istanbul, Turkey. 2. Dept. of Molecular and Clinical Medicine/Cardiology, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Sweden. 3. Dept of Clinical Sciences, Respiratory Medicine and Allergology, Faculty of Medicine, Lund University, Lund, Sweden. 4. Koc University Research Center for Translational Medicine (KUTTAM), Istanbul, Turkey; Dept. of Molecular and Clinical Medicine/Cardiology, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Sweden; Dept of Clinical Sciences, Respiratory Medicine and Allergology, Faculty of Medicine, Lund University, Lund, Sweden; Division of Pulmonary, Allergy, and Critical Care Medicine, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, USA. Electronic address: yuksel.peker@lungall.gu.se.
Abstract
BACKGROUND:Anxiety and obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) coexist among adults with coronary artery disease (CAD) following revascularization. Continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) is the first line treatment of OSA patients with daytime sleepiness. The current study evaluated the effect of CPAP on anxiety in CAD patients with nonsleepy OSA. METHODS:Two hundred forty-four revascularized CAD patients with nonsleepy OSA (apnea-hypopnea index ≥15/h, Epworth Sleepiness Scale score <10) were randomly assigned to CPAP or no-CPAP between 2005 and 2010. Zung Self-rating Anxiety Scale (SAS) was administered at baseline and after 3 and 12 months with higher scores suggesting more anxiety. RESULTS: A total of 208 patients with complete SAS scores at baseline and 12-month follow-up were included (CPAP, n = 103; no-CPAP, n = 105). In the intention-to-treat analysis, CPAP had no significant effect on the SAS scores. On-treatment analysis revealed a significant increase in the median of delta SAS score (+3.75) after three months among the participants using the device 2.8 h/day or more while there was a decline in the median of delta SAS score (-1.25) in the non-adherent or no-CPAP group (p = 0.031). The increase in the SAS score (+1.25) in the adherent group, and the decline (-1.25 points) in the non-adherent/no-CPAP group remained significant after one year (p = 0.011). Baseline SAS score predicted non-adherence [adjusted odds ratio 1.11; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.04-1.18; p = 0.003], and there was an association between the increase in the SAS scores and accumulated CPAP hours/day [standardized β = 0.144 (95% CI 0.005-0.695), p = 0.047]. CONCLUSION: Our results suggest that anxiety should be considered in the management of CAD patients with nonsleepy OSA following revascularization. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT00519597.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND:Anxiety and obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) coexist among adults with coronary artery disease (CAD) following revascularization. Continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) is the first line treatment of OSA patients with daytime sleepiness. The current study evaluated the effect of CPAP on anxiety in CAD patients with nonsleepy OSA. METHODS: Two hundred forty-four revascularized CAD patients with nonsleepy OSA (apnea-hypopnea index ≥15/h, Epworth Sleepiness Scale score <10) were randomly assigned to CPAP or no-CPAP between 2005 and 2010. Zung Self-rating Anxiety Scale (SAS) was administered at baseline and after 3 and 12 months with higher scores suggesting more anxiety. RESULTS: A total of 208 patients with complete SAS scores at baseline and 12-month follow-up were included (CPAP, n = 103; no-CPAP, n = 105). In the intention-to-treat analysis, CPAP had no significant effect on the SAS scores. On-treatment analysis revealed a significant increase in the median of delta SAS score (+3.75) after three months among the participants using the device 2.8 h/day or more while there was a decline in the median of delta SAS score (-1.25) in the non-adherent or no-CPAP group (p = 0.031). The increase in the SAS score (+1.25) in the adherent group, and the decline (-1.25 points) in the non-adherent/no-CPAP group remained significant after one year (p = 0.011). Baseline SAS score predicted non-adherence [adjusted odds ratio 1.11; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.04-1.18; p = 0.003], and there was an association between the increase in the SAS scores and accumulated CPAP hours/day [standardized β = 0.144 (95% CI 0.005-0.695), p = 0.047]. CONCLUSION: Our results suggest that anxiety should be considered in the management of CAD patients with nonsleepy OSA following revascularization. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT00519597.
Authors: Andrey V Zinchuk; Jen-Hwa Chu; Jiasheng Liang; Yeliz Celik; Sara Op de Beeck; Nancy S Redeker; Andrew Wellman; H Klar Yaggi; Yüksel Peker; Scott A Sands Journal: Am J Respir Crit Care Med Date: 2021-09-15 Impact factor: 30.528