Literature DB >> 33341466

Comparison of historical and contemporary isolates of Senecavirus A.

Alexandra C Buckley1, David D Michael2, Kay S Faaberg2, Baoqing Guo3, Kyoung-Jin Yoon3, Kelly M Lager2.   

Abstract

Senecavirus A (SVA) was discovered as a cell culture contaminant in 2002, and multiple attempts to experimentally reproduce disease were unsuccessful. Field reports of porcine idiopathic vesicular disease (PIVD) cases testing PCR positive for SVA in addition to outbreaks of PIVD in Brazil and the United States in 2015 suggested SVA was a causative agent, which has now been consistently demonstrated experimentally. Ease of experimental reproduction of disease with contemporary strains of SVA raised questions concerning the difficulty of reproducing vesicular disease with historical isolates. The following study was conducted to compare the pathogenicity of SVA between historical and contemporary isolates in growing pigs. Six groups of pigs (n = 8) were intranasally inoculated with the following SVA isolates: SVV001/2002, CAN/2011, HI/2012, IA/2015, NC/2015, SD/2015. All isolates induced vesicular disease in at least half of the inoculated pigs from each group. All pigs replicated virus as demonstrated by serum and/or swab samples positive for SVA by quantitative PCR. Pig sera tested by virus neutralization assay demonstrated cross-neutralizing antibodies against all viruses utilized in the study. Cross-neutralizing antibodies from pigs inoculated with historical isolates were lower than those pigs that were inoculated with contemporary isolates. Phylogenetic analysis revealed two clades with SVV001/2002 being in a separate clade compared to the other five isolates. Although differences in the infection kinetics and sequences of these six isolates were found, clinical presentation of vesicular disease was similar between both historical and contemporary isolates. Published by Elsevier B.V.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Historical; SVA; SVV; Seneca Valley virus; Senecavirus A; Sequencing; Swine

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 33341466     DOI: 10.1016/j.vetmic.2020.108946

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vet Microbiol        ISSN: 0378-1135            Impact factor:   3.293


  5 in total

1.  Tolerance of Senecavirus A to Mutations in Its Kissing-Loop or Pseudoknot Structure Computationally Predicted in 3' Untranslated Region.

Authors:  Fuxiao Liu; Di Zhao; Ning Wang; Ziwei Li; Yaqin Dong; Shuang Liu; Feng Zhang; Jin Cui; Hailan Meng; Bo Ni; Rong Wei; Hu Shan
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2022-05-30       Impact factor: 6.064

2.  Comparative Proteomic Analysis Reveals Mx1 Inhibits Senecavirus A Replication in PK-15 Cells by Interacting with the Capsid Proteins VP1, VP2 and VP3.

Authors:  Hang Gao; Zhaoying Xiang; Xinna Ge; Lei Zhou; Jun Han; Xin Guo; Yanhong Chen; Yongning Zhang; Hanchun Yang
Journal:  Viruses       Date:  2022-04-21       Impact factor: 5.818

3.  Infectious dose of Senecavirus A in market weight and neonatal pigs.

Authors:  Alexandra Buckley; Kelly Lager
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-04-29       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Characterization of Senecavirus A Isolates Collected From the Environment of U.S. Sow Slaughter Plants.

Authors:  Kyle S Hoffman; Nicki L Humphrey; John A Korslund; Tavis K Anderson; Kay S Faaberg; Kelly M Lager; Alexandra C Buckley
Journal:  Front Vet Sci       Date:  2022-06-22

5.  Comparative Evaluation of the Foot-and-Mouth Disease Virus Permissive LF-BK αVβ6 Cell Line for Senecavirus A Research.

Authors:  Jessica Mason; Victoria Primavera; Lauren Martignette; Benjamin Clark; Jose Barrera; Janine Simmons; William Hurtle; John G Neilan; Michael Puckette
Journal:  Viruses       Date:  2022-08-25       Impact factor: 5.818

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.