Sarah Joyce1. 1. School of Sociology & Social Policy, University of Leeds, UK. Electronic address: dr.sjjoyce1@gmail.com.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The birth environment can help or hinder physiological birth and influence a woman's level of satisfaction with birth. AIM: This paper gives new theoretical insights into how spatial architecture influences birthing women and their birth processes. It builds the architectural awareness of midwives/ designers need by linking design regulations/recommendations and experiential aspects of birth spaces architecture. METHODS: Two qualitative methods were used: (1) a regulation/policy document critique, and (2) childbearing women's spatial experiences explored in semi-structured interviews with drawing methods (24 mothers in a case study location in the north of England, UK). Themes emerged from semiotic (documents/visual data) and thematic (transcripts) analysis, and their relationships explored. FINDINGS: The regulatory documents revealed four spatial categorization concepts: (1) medical risk; (2) a tripartite clinical approach; (3) single-function birth space; and (4) a woman-centered approach. In contrast, women experience birth spaces architecture as an amalgam of all the spaces they use and in affective, interpersonal. Two patterns of spatial use emerged from the interviews: (1) 'wait and transfer' (more common in healthcare buildings); and (2) 'curate and prosume' (more common in women's homes). Women gave greater positive descriptions of the 'curate and prosume' pattern. CONCLUSIONS: The influence of building regulations on hospital settings and women's prior experiences of such spaces through appointments and antenatal education, shape women's spatial experiences of childbirth. This new evidence can act as a catalyst to evolve birth space design towards delivering woman-centered and personalized care in spaces designed for women to 'curate and prosume'.
BACKGROUND: The birth environment can help or hinder physiological birth and influence a woman's level of satisfaction with birth. AIM: This paper gives new theoretical insights into how spatial architecture influences birthing women and their birth processes. It builds the architectural awareness of midwives/ designers need by linking design regulations/recommendations and experiential aspects of birth spaces architecture. METHODS: Two qualitative methods were used: (1) a regulation/policy document critique, and (2) childbearing women's spatial experiences explored in semi-structured interviews with drawing methods (24 mothers in a case study location in the north of England, UK). Themes emerged from semiotic (documents/visual data) and thematic (transcripts) analysis, and their relationships explored. FINDINGS: The regulatory documents revealed four spatial categorization concepts: (1) medical risk; (2) a tripartite clinical approach; (3) single-function birth space; and (4) a woman-centered approach. In contrast, women experience birth spaces architecture as an amalgam of all the spaces they use and in affective, interpersonal. Two patterns of spatial use emerged from the interviews: (1) 'wait and transfer' (more common in healthcare buildings); and (2) 'curate and prosume' (more common in women's homes). Women gave greater positive descriptions of the 'curate and prosume' pattern. CONCLUSIONS: The influence of building regulations on hospital settings and women's prior experiences of such spaces through appointments and antenatal education, shape women's spatial experiences of childbirth. This new evidence can act as a catalyst to evolve birth space design towards delivering woman-centered and personalized care in spaces designed for women to 'curate and prosume'.