Angela C B Trude1, Linda M Richter2, Jere R Behrman3, Aryeh D Stein4, Ana M B Menezes5, Maureen M Black6. 1. Growth and Nutrition Division, Department of Pediatrics, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA. 2. DSI-NRF Centre of Excellence in Human Development, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa. 3. Economics Department, The Ronald O Perelman Center for Political Science and Economics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA. 4. Hubert Department of Global Health, Rollins School of Public Health Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA. 5. Postgraduate Program of Epidemiology, Federal University of Pelotas, Pelotas, Brazil. 6. Growth and Nutrition Division, Department of Pediatrics, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA; RTI International, Durham, NC, USA. Electronic address: mblack@som.umaryland.edu.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Millions of children globally are at risk of not reaching their developmental potential because of early adversities. We hypothesised that responsive caregiving and learning opportunities, components of nurturing care, at pre-school ages might mitigate the effects of adversities. METHODS: We analysed longitudinal birth cohort data from Brazil (1993 Pelotas Birth Cohort, n=632) and South Africa (Birth to Twenty Plus [Bt20+] Birth Cohort, n=1130) to assess whether responsive caregiving and learning opportunities at pre-school ages (2-4 years) modified associations between cumulative early adversities and adolescent human capital. The cumulative adversities score (range 0-9) included household wealth and crowding; mothers' schooling, height, age, and mental health; and children's birthweight, gestational age, and length at age 12 months. We extracted data on responsive caregiving and learning opportunities from the Early Childhood Home Observation for Measurement of the Environment inventory, assessed at age 4 years (1993 Pelotas cohort) and 2 years (Bt20+ cohort). We examined three human capital indicators: intelligence quotient (IQ) assessed at age 18 years (1993 Pelotas cohort) and 16 years (Bt20+ cohort); psychosocial adjustment assessed at age 15 years and 14 years, respectively; and height assessed at age 18 years and 16 years, respectively. We used linear models with interaction terms between cumulative adversities, and responsive caregiving and learning opportunities, to predict adolescent human capital. FINDINGS: For each additional Z score of total cumulative adversity, adolescent IQ decreased by 5·89 (95% CI -7·29 to -4·50) points in the 1993 Pelotas cohort (p<0·0001) and 2·69 (-4·52 to -0·86) points in the Bt20+ cohort (p=0·0039). After adjusting for total cumulative adversities, adolescent IQ points increased by 5·47 (95% CI 4·20 to 6·74) with each additional Z score of learning opportunities and by 2·26 (0·93 to 3·59) with each additional Z score of responsive caregiving in the 1993 Pelotas cohort, but not in the Bt20+ cohort (0·86 [-0·12 to 1·83] and 0·65 [-0·32 to 1·61], respectively). Associations between early adversities and IQ were modified by learning opportunities in the 1993 Pelotas cohort (beta coefficient for interaction 1·74, 95% CI 0·43 to 3·04; p=0·0092) and by responsive caregiving in the Bt20+ cohort (2·24, 0·94 to 3·54; p=0·0075). High nurturing environment attenuated the negative effects of early cumulative adversities on IQ. INTERPRETATION: Early nurturing home environments protect young children against effects of early adversities on adolescent IQ, with long-term positive associations on adolescent cognition in two middle-income countries. FUNDING: Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation.
BACKGROUND: Millions of children globally are at risk of not reaching their developmental potential because of early adversities. We hypothesised that responsive caregiving and learning opportunities, components of nurturing care, at pre-school ages might mitigate the effects of adversities. METHODS: We analysed longitudinal birth cohort data from Brazil (1993 Pelotas Birth Cohort, n=632) and South Africa (Birth to Twenty Plus [Bt20+] Birth Cohort, n=1130) to assess whether responsive caregiving and learning opportunities at pre-school ages (2-4 years) modified associations between cumulative early adversities and adolescent human capital. The cumulative adversities score (range 0-9) included household wealth and crowding; mothers' schooling, height, age, and mental health; and children's birthweight, gestational age, and length at age 12 months. We extracted data on responsive caregiving and learning opportunities from the Early Childhood Home Observation for Measurement of the Environment inventory, assessed at age 4 years (1993 Pelotas cohort) and 2 years (Bt20+ cohort). We examined three human capital indicators: intelligence quotient (IQ) assessed at age 18 years (1993 Pelotas cohort) and 16 years (Bt20+ cohort); psychosocial adjustment assessed at age 15 years and 14 years, respectively; and height assessed at age 18 years and 16 years, respectively. We used linear models with interaction terms between cumulative adversities, and responsive caregiving and learning opportunities, to predict adolescent human capital. FINDINGS: For each additional Z score of total cumulative adversity, adolescent IQ decreased by 5·89 (95% CI -7·29 to -4·50) points in the 1993 Pelotas cohort (p<0·0001) and 2·69 (-4·52 to -0·86) points in the Bt20+ cohort (p=0·0039). After adjusting for total cumulative adversities, adolescent IQ points increased by 5·47 (95% CI 4·20 to 6·74) with each additional Z score of learning opportunities and by 2·26 (0·93 to 3·59) with each additional Z score of responsive caregiving in the 1993 Pelotas cohort, but not in the Bt20+ cohort (0·86 [-0·12 to 1·83] and 0·65 [-0·32 to 1·61], respectively). Associations between early adversities and IQ were modified by learning opportunities in the 1993 Pelotas cohort (beta coefficient for interaction 1·74, 95% CI 0·43 to 3·04; p=0·0092) and by responsive caregiving in the Bt20+ cohort (2·24, 0·94 to 3·54; p=0·0075). High nurturing environment attenuated the negative effects of early cumulative adversities on IQ. INTERPRETATION: Early nurturing home environments protect young children against effects of early adversities on adolescent IQ, with long-term positive associations on adolescent cognition in two middle-income countries. FUNDING: Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation.
Authors: Maureen M Black; Doris P Yimgang; Kristen M Hurley; Kimberly B Harding; Sylvia Fernandez-Rao; Nagalla Balakrishna; Kankipati V Radhakrishna; Gregory A Reinhart; Krishnapillai Madhavan Nair Journal: Dev Sci Date: 2019-03-18
Authors: Elizabeth L Prado; Leila M Larson; Katherine Cox; Kory Bettencourt; Julianne N Kubes; Anuraj H Shankar Journal: Lancet Glob Health Date: 2019-10 Impact factor: 26.763
Authors: Helen Clark; Awa Marie Coll-Seck; Anshu Banerjee; Stefan Peterson; Sarah L Dalglish; Shanthi Ameratunga; Dina Balabanova; Maharaj Kishan Bhan; Zulfiqar A Bhutta; John Borrazzo; Mariam Claeson; Tanya Doherty; Fadi El-Jardali; Asha S George; Angela Gichaga; Lu Gram; David B Hipgrave; Aku Kwamie; Qingyue Meng; Raúl Mercer; Sunita Narain; Jesca Nsungwa-Sabiiti; Adesola O Olumide; David Osrin; Timothy Powell-Jackson; Kumanan Rasanathan; Imran Rasul; Papaarangi Reid; Jennifer Requejo; Sarah S Rohde; Nigel Rollins; Magali Romedenne; Harshpal Singh Sachdev; Rana Saleh; Yusra R Shawar; Jeremy Shiffman; Jonathon Simon; Peter D Sly; Karin Stenberg; Mark Tomlinson; Rajani R Ved; Anthony Costello Journal: Lancet Date: 2020-02-19 Impact factor: 202.731
Authors: James F Leckman; Liliana Angelica Ponguta; Gabriela Pavarini; Sascha D Hein; Michael F McCarthy; Haifa Staiti; Suna Hanöz-Penney; Joanna Rubinstein; Kyle D Pruett; M Yanki Yazgan; N Shemrah Fallon; Franz J Hartl; Margalit Ziv; Rima Salah; Pia Rebello Britto; Siobhán Fitzpatrick; Catherine Panter-Brick Journal: Compr Psychoneuroendocrinol Date: 2021-10-09
Authors: Robert E Black; Li Liu; Fernando P Hartwig; Francisco Villavicencio; Andrea Rodriguez-Martinez; Luis P Vidaletti; Jamie Perin; Maureen M Black; Hannah Blencowe; Danzhen You; Lucia Hug; Bruno Masquelier; Simon Cousens; Amber Gove; Tyler Vaivada; Diana Yeung; Jere Behrman; Reynaldo Martorell; Clive Osmond; Aryeh D Stein; Linda S Adair; Caroline H D Fall; Bernardo Horta; Ana M B Menezes; Manuel Ramirez-Zea; Linda M Richter; George C Patton; Eran Bendavid; Majid Ezzati; Zulfiqar A Bhutta; Joy E Lawn; Cesar G Victora Journal: Lancet Date: 2022-04-27 Impact factor: 202.731
Authors: Alysse J Kowalski; O Yaw Addo; Michael R Kramer; Reynaldo Martorell; Shane A Norris; Rachel N Waford; Linda M Richter; Aryeh D Stein Journal: J Adolesc Health Date: 2021-01-09 Impact factor: 5.012
Authors: Maureen M Black; Jere R Behrman; Bernadette Daelmans; Elizabeth L Prado; Linda Richter; Mark Tomlinson; Angela C B Trude; Donald Wertlieb; Alice J Wuermli; Hirokazu Yoshikawa Journal: BMJ Glob Health Date: 2021-04
Authors: Angela C B Trude; Rafaela Costa Martins; Thais Martins-Silva; Cauane Blumenberg; Marina X Carpena; Bianca Del-Ponte; Christian Loret de Mola Journal: Inquiry Date: 2021 Jan-Dec Impact factor: 1.730
Authors: Lorraine Sherr; Kathryn J Roberts; Mark Tomlinson; Sarah Skeen; Helen Mebrahtu; Sarah Gordon; Stefani du Toit; Katharina Haag; Lucie D Cluver Journal: AIDS Behav Date: 2021-06-11