Literature DB >> 33340402

Impact of low serum progesterone levels on the day of embryo transfer on pregnancy outcome: a prospective cohort study in artificial cycles with vaginal progesterone.

Elena Labarta1,2, Giulia Mariani1, Stefania Paolelli1,2, Cristina Rodriguez-Varela2, Carmina Vidal1,2, Juan Giles1,2, José Bellver1,2, Fabio Cruz1,2, Alicia Marzal1,2, Paula Celada1,2, Ines Olmo1,2, Pilar Alamá1,2, José Remohi1,2, Ernesto Bosch1,2.   

Abstract

STUDY QUESTION: Is there a serum progesterone (P) threshold on the day of embryo transfer (ET) in artificial endometrium preparation cycles below which the chances of ongoing pregnancy are reduced? SUMMARY ANSWER: Serum P levels <8.8 ng/ml on the day of ET lower ongoing pregnancy rate (OPR) in both own or donated oocyte cycles. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: We previously found that serum P levels <9.2 ng/ml on the day of ET significantly decrease OPR in a sample of 211 oocyte donation recipients. Here, we assessed whether these results are applicable to all infertile patients under an artificial endometrial preparation cycle, regardless of the oocyte origin. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION: This prospective cohort study was performed between September 2017 and November 2018 and enrolled 1205 patients scheduled for ET after an artificial endometrial preparation cycle with estradiol valerate and micronized vaginal P (MVP, 400 mg twice daily). PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING,
METHODS: Patients ≤50 years old with a triple-layer endometrium ≥6.5 mm underwent transfer of one or two blastocysts. A total of 1150 patients treated with own oocytes without preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidies (PGT-A) (n = 184), own oocytes with PGT-A (n = 308) or donated oocytes (n = 658) were analyzed. The primary endpoint was the OPR beyond pregnancy week 12 based on serum P levels measured immediately before ET. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: Women with serum P levels <8.8 ng/ml (30th percentile) had a significantly lower OPR (36.6% vs 54.4%) and live birth rate (35.5% vs 52.0%) than the rest of the patients. Multivariate logistic regression showed that serum P < 8.8 ng/ml was an independent factor influencing OPR in the overall population and in the three treatment groups. A significant negative correlation was observed between serum P levels and BMI, weight and time between the last P dose and blood tests and a positive correlation was found with age, height and number of days on HRT. Multivariate logistic regression showed that only body weight was an independent factor for presenting serum P levels <8.8 ng/ml. Obstetrical and perinatal outcomes did not differ in patients with ongoing pregnancy regardless of serum P levels being above/below 8.8 ng/ml. LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION: Only women with MVP were included. Extrapolation to other P administration forms needs to be validated. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE
FINDINGS: This study identified the threshold of serum P as 8.8 ng/ml on the day of ET for artificial endometrial preparation cycles necessary to optimize outcomes, in cycles with own or donated oocytes. One-third of patients receiving MVP show inadequate levels of serum P that, in turn, impact the success of the ART cycle. Monitoring P levels in the mid-luteal phase is recommended when using MVP to adjust the doses according to the needs of the patient. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S): None. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT03272412.
© The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology. All rights reserved. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Keywords:  artificial cycle; hormonal replacement therapy; luteal phase support; pregnancy outcome; serum progesterone

Year:  2021        PMID: 33340402     DOI: 10.1093/humrep/deaa322

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Reprod        ISSN: 0268-1161            Impact factor:   6.918


  11 in total

1.  Progesterone and estrogen levels are associated with live birth rates following artificial cycle frozen embryo transfers.

Authors:  Ronit Beck-Fruchter; Simon Nothman; Shira Baram; Yoel Geslevich; Amir Weiss
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2021-09-18       Impact factor: 3.412

Review 2.  The optimal route of progesterone administration for luteal phase support in a frozen embryo transfer: a systematic review.

Authors:  Abdulla Almohammadi; Ainharan Raveendran; Mairead Black; Abha Maheshwari
Journal:  Arch Gynecol Obstet       Date:  2022-08-09       Impact factor: 2.493

3.  Low Luteal Serum Progesterone Levels Are Associated With Lower Ongoing Pregnancy and Live Birth Rates in ART: Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses.

Authors:  Noemie Ranisavljevic; Stephanie Huberlant; Marie Montagut; Pierre-Marie Alonzo; Bernadette Darné; Solène Languille; Tal Anahory; Isabelle Cédrin-Durnerin
Journal:  Front Endocrinol (Lausanne)       Date:  2022-06-10       Impact factor: 6.055

4.  Investigate the interaction of testosterone/progesterone with ionic liquids on varying the anion to combat COVID-19: Density functional theory calculations and molecular docking approach.

Authors:  Kamlesh Kumari; Ajay Kumar; Indra Bahadur; Prashant Singh
Journal:  J Phys Org Chem       Date:  2021-08-18       Impact factor: 2.155

5.  Does serum progesterone level impact the ongoing pregnancy rate in frozen embryo transfer under artificial preparation with vaginal progesterone? Study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Lin Haiyan; Yang Gang; Li Yu; Li Lin; Chen Xiaoli; Zhang Qingxue
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2022-01-03       Impact factor: 2.279

6.  Systematic review update and meta-analysis of randomized and non-randomized controlled trials of ovarian stimulation versus artificial cycle for endometrial preparation prior to frozen embryo transfer in women with polycystic ovary syndrome.

Authors:  Yingying Zhang; Ling Wu; Tin Chiu Li; Chi Chiu Wang; Tao Zhang; Jacqueline Pui Wah Chung
Journal:  Reprod Biol Endocrinol       Date:  2022-04-02       Impact factor: 5.211

Review 7.  Perspectives on the development and future of oocyte IVM in clinical practice.

Authors:  Michel De Vos; Michaël Grynberg; Tuong M Ho; Ye Yuan; David F Albertini; Robert B Gilchrist
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2021-07-03       Impact factor: 3.412

8.  Impact of endometrial preparation on early pregnancy loss and live birth rate after frozen embryo transfer: a large multicenter cohort study (14 421 frozen cycles).

Authors:  L Vinsonneau; J Labrosse; G Porcu-Buisson; N Chevalier; J Galey; N Ahdad; J P Ayel; C Rongières; P E Bouet; E Mathieu d'Argent; I Cédrin-Durnerin; F Pessione; N Massin
Journal:  Hum Reprod Open       Date:  2022-02-15

9.  Preparation of the Endometrium for Frozen Embryo Transfer: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Sezcan Mumusoglu; Mehtap Polat; Irem Yarali Ozbek; Gurkan Bozdag; Evangelos G Papanikolaou; Sandro C Esteves; Peter Humaidan; Hakan Yarali
Journal:  Front Endocrinol (Lausanne)       Date:  2021-07-09       Impact factor: 5.555

10.  Serum Progesterone Profile Across the Mid and Late Luteal Phase in Artificial Cycles Is Associated With Pregnancy Outcome.

Authors:  Elena Labarta; Cristina Rodríguez-Varela; Giulia Mariani; Ernesto Bosch
Journal:  Front Endocrinol (Lausanne)       Date:  2021-06-10       Impact factor: 5.555

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.