Literature DB >> 33340234

Automatically assessed P-wave predicts cardiac events independently of left atrial enlargement in patients with cardiovascular risks: The Japan Morning Surge-Home Blood Pressure Study.

Ayako Yokota1, Tomoyuki Kabutoya1, Satoshi Hoshide1, Kazuomi Kario1.   

Abstract

A prolonged P-wave in electrocardiography (ECG) reflects atrial remodeling and predicts the development of atrial fibrillation (AF). The authors enrolled 810 subjects in the Japan Morning Surge Home Blood Pressure (J-HOP) study who had ≥1 cardiovascular (CV) risk factor. The duration of P-wave was automatically analyzed by standard 12-lead electrocardiogram. Left atrial (LA) enlargement and left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) were measured on echocardiography. The primary end points were fatal/nonfatal cardiac events: myocardial infarction, sudden death, and hospitalization for heart failure. The maximum P-wave duration (Pmax) from the 12 leads was selected for analysis. The authors compared four prolonged P-wave cutoffs (Pmax = 120, 130, 140, 150 ms) and cardiac events. LA diameter and left ventricular mass index (LVMI) were significantly associated with Pmax (r = 0.08, P = .02 and r = 0.17, P < .001, respectively). When the cutoff level was Pmax 120 or 130 ms, prolonged P-wave was not associated with cardiac events (P = .45 and P = .10), but when a prolonged P-wave was defined as Pmax ≥ 140 ms (n = 50) or Pmax ≥ 150 ms (n = 19), the patients in those groups had significantly higher incidence of cardiac events than others (P < .001 and P = .03). A Cox proportional hazards model including age, gender, body mass index, smoking, regular drinker, hypertension, dyslipidemia, diabetes, office systolic blood pressure, heart rate, LA enlargement, and LVH revealed that prolonged P-wave defined as Pmax ≥ 140 ms was independently associated with cardiac events (hazard ratio: 4.23; 95% confidence interval: 1.30-13.77; P = .02). In conclusion, the automatically assessed prolonged P-wave was associated with cardiac events independently of LA enlargement and LVH in Japanese patients with CV risks.
© 2020 The Authors. The Journal of Clinical Hypertension published by Wiley Periodicals LLC.

Entities:  

Keywords:  P-wave; cardiac events; hypertension; left atrial enlargement; left ventricular hypertrophy

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 33340234      PMCID: PMC8029816          DOI: 10.1111/jch.14136

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)        ISSN: 1524-6175            Impact factor:   3.738


INTRODUCTION

Hypertension, obesity, and diabetes increase atrial electrophysiological and morphological remodeling by ischemic, metabolic, and inflammatory factors. , Chronic atrial stress under those conditions promotes atrial myocyte hypertrophy, fibrosis, and gap junction modulation, providing a mechanism for pro‐arrhythmic mechano‐electric feedback. Prolonged P‐wave on 12‐lead electrocardiogram (ECG) reflects atrial electrical remodeling. In the previous studies, prolonged P‐wave was associated with left atrial (LA) indices (ie, LA dilatation), , prolonged A‐wave acceleration times, reduced LA stroke volume, and reduced LA ejection fraction on echocardiography. P‐wave duration is a significant predictor of developing atrial fibrillation. , , , , In addition, prolonged P‐wave was associated with cardiovascular (CV) death and all‐cause mortality, , and increment in the P‐wave duration was associated with increase in CV death. Therefore, P‐wave prolongation not only reflects atrial remodeling but also plays a role as a marker of cardiac events. However, there has been no examination of the relationship among P‐wave duration, blood pressure (BP) levels, LA/ left ventricle (LV) morphology on echocardiography and cardiac events. The aim of this study was to evaluate the association among automatically assessed P‐wave duration, BP, LA diameter, LV hypertrophy (LVH), and cardiac events in patients with CV risk factors.

METHODS

The Japan Morning Surge Home Blood Pressure (J‐HOP) study was an observational 5‐year prospective study that recruited 4310 patients who had at least one of the following CV risk factors: hypertension, dyslipidemia, diabetes, smoking, and history of angina pectoris/myocardial infarction/heart failure/stroke. The study protocol was registered on the University Hospital Medicine Information Network Clinical Trials Registry: #UMIN000000894.

Study populations

We obtained ECG data of 834 outpatients who underwent automatic analysis ECG at the Jichi Medical University School of Medicine. After excluding 24 patients with atrial fibrillation, we finally analyzed 810 patients with the max P‐wave duration. We defined current smoking status as smoking status or not. Alcohol exposure was defined as regular consumption of alcoholic drinks. Hyperlipidemia was defined as a total cholesterol level ≥240 mg/dl or treated hyperlipidemia. Subjects were considered to have diabetes if they reported a diabetes, or if they were taking medications for diabetes or had fasting blood sugar ≥126 mg/dl. Blood pressure was obtained after a rest period of at least 5 min using an automatic manometer at the local medical center. Office BP was calculated as the average of three consecutive measurements. Hypertension was defined as systolic BP ≥ 140 mmHg or diastolic BP ≥ 90 mmHg, use of hypertension medications, or diagnosis of hypertension by a physician. Patients with any of the following were excluded: chronic renal failure requiring hemodialysis; other serious illnesses (eg, end‐stage cancer, active connective tissue disease); alcohol or drug addiction; or inability to attend hospital visits or provide informed consent.

ECG and echocardiography measurement

Standard 12‐lead surface electrocardiography (25 mm/s, 1 mV/cm, and 100 Hz) was conducted, and the duration of the P‐wave was automatically analyzed in each lead using the 12‐lead ECG analysis system (Fukuda Denshi, Tokyo). P‐wave duration was measured from the P‐wave onset (conclusion of the T‐P segment) to its offset (return to baseline for the remaining PR interval). The maximum P‐wave duration (Pmax) from the 12 leads was selected for analysis. We set the cutoff levels of Pmax as 120, 130, 140, and 150 ms The Cornell voltage (CV) was automatically measured by a computer, and then, the Cornell product (CP) was determined as the product of the CV multiplied by the QRS duration. The LVH of ECG (ECG‐LVH) was defined as ≥244 mV × ms according to the Losartan Intervention for Endpoint Reduction in Hypertension Study. Echocardiography was obtained with the echocardiographic window at the left sternal border with the patient in the left lateral position. Two‐dimensional M‐mode or B‐mode imaging was obtained according to the guidelines of the American Society of Echocardiography. Measurements of the left atrial (LA) dimension were made at end systole by the long‐axis view. We defined LA enlargement (LAE) as an LA dimension ≥40 mm. , Left ventricular mass (LVM) was obtained using the formula validated by the American Society of Echocardiography: LVM = 0.8 × 1.04 [(IVS + LVID + PWT)3 − LVID3] + 0.6 g, where IVS is interventricular septum, LVID is LV internal diameter, and PWT is inferolateral wall thickness. The LVM index (LVMI) was calculated as LVM/body surface area. LVH by echocardiography (echo‐LVH) was defined as LVMI > 115 g/m2 in men and >95 g/m2 in women as reported in the previous guideline. We obtained 758 patients’ LA diameter and 757 patients’ LVMI on echocardiography.

Primary end point

The primary end points of this study were (1) fatal and nonfatal acute myocardial infarction, (2) sudden death within 24 h of the abrupt onset of symptoms, and (3) fatal and nonfatal heart failure that required admission. The end point committee adjudicated all events by reviewing the patients’ files and source documents or by requesting more detailed written information from investigators. The committee was blinded to individual clinical characteristics including home BP data.

Statistical analysis

Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS (version 26; IBM Inc, Chicago, IL, USA). Date are expressed as percentages, mean, and standard deviations (SD). The differences between groups were analyzed using the chi‐square test for categorical variables and using the independent t test for continuous variables. The event‐free survival curve was derived using Kaplan‐Meier analysis. The hazard ratio of prolonged P‐wave and P‐wave duration (per 10 ms) was evaluated by using the Cox proportional hazard model with adjustment for age, gender, body mass index, smoking, regular drinker, hypertension, dyslipidemia, diabetes, office systolic BP, heart rate, LAE, and echo‐LVH. Receiver‐operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was used to determine optimal cutoff values with corresponding sensitivity and specificity of P‐wave duration for the primary end point. A difference was considered significant if the probability value was <0.05.

RESULTS

The average age was 62.6 ± 10.9 years, and the percentage of male subjects was 51.5% in this study. The baseline characteristics by P‐wave cutoff level ≥140 ms are shown in Table 1. The average age and body mass index, the percentages of smokers, regular drinkers, diabetic patients, and patients with dyslipidemia were similar in both groups. The percentage of male patients and office systolic BP in the prolonged P‐wave group (Pmax ≥ 140 ms) were higher than those in the control group (Pmax < 140 ms; percentage of males: 68% vs. 50%, P = .014; office systolic BP: 144.8 ± 19.7 mmHg vs. 139.2 ± 16.0 mmHg, P = .018). Heart rate in the prolonged P‐wave group was also higher than that in the control group (72.3 ± 17.3 vs. 66.6 ± 11.8 bpm, P = .024).
Table 1

Patient characteristics

P < 140 ms (n = 760)P ≥ 140 ms (n = 50) P
Age (years)62.5 ± 10.864.2 ± 12.1.270
Male (%)5068.014
BMI (kg/m2)24.5 ± 3.625.4 ± 3.4.083
Smoking (%)1010.953
Regular drinker (%)1926.315
Hypertension (%)9094.398
Dyslipidemia (%)3326.284
Diabetes (%)2940.121
Office SBP (mmHg)139.2 ± 16.0144.8 ± 19.7.018
Office DBP (mmHg)81.3 ± 11.582.9 ± 12.5.356
Heart rate (bpm)66.6 ± 11.872.3 ± 17.3.024
ECG‐LVH (%)1322.163
LAD (%) n = 7583046.048
Echo‐LVH (%) n = 7573139.238

Abbreviations: BMI, body mass index; DBP, diastolic blood pressure; ECG‐LVH, left ventricular hypertrophy diagnosed by electrocardiography; Echo‐LVH, left ventricular hypertrophy diagnosed by echocardiography; LAD, left atrial dilatation; SBP, systolic blood pressure.

Patient characteristics Abbreviations: BMI, body mass index; DBP, diastolic blood pressure; ECG‐LVH, left ventricular hypertrophy diagnosed by electrocardiography; Echo‐LVH, left ventricular hypertrophy diagnosed by echocardiography; LAD, left atrial dilatation; SBP, systolic blood pressure.

Primary end point and P‐wave duration

There were 22 events during an average follow‐up of 6.9 ± 2.0 years. When the cutoff level was Pmax 120 ms and 130 ms, prolonged P‐wave was not associated with cardiac events (P = .45 and P = .10, respectively; Figure 1A,B), but when a prolonged P‐wave was defined as Pmax ≥ 140 ms (n = 50) and Pmax ≥ 150 ms (n = 19), the patients in that group had significantly higher cardiac events than others (P < .001 and P = .02, respectively; Figure 1C,D).
Figure 1

Primary end point and prolonged P‐wave. P‐wave cutoff levels of (A) 120 ms, (B) 130 ms, (C) 140 ms, and (D) 150 ms

Primary end point and prolonged P‐wave. P‐wave cutoff levels of (A) 120 ms, (B) 130 ms, (C) 140 ms, and (D) 150 ms Hazard ratios of cardiac events for each definition after Cox proportional hazard model are shown in Figure 2. Prolonged P‐wave defined as Pmax ≥ 140 ms was significantly associated with cardiac events after adjusting for age, gender, body mass index, smoking, regular drinker, hypertension, dyslipidemia, diabetes, office systolic BP, heart rate, and the percentages of LAE and echo‐LVH (adjusted HR 4.23, 95% CI 1.30–13.77, P = .02; Figure 2B). In addition, P‐wave defined as Pmax ≥ 150 ms was also independently associated with cardiac events (adjusted HR 5.01, 95% CI 1.09‐22.98, P = .04; Figure 2B). The hazard ratio for a 10‐ms increase in max P‐wave duration was 1.12 (95% CI 0.85–1.47, P = .41). The cutoff point of P‐wave duration was 137 ms, and the area under the ROC curve was 0.513.
Figure 2

Hazard ratio of cardiovascular events. (A) Unadjusted HR, (B) adjusted HR. Adjusted HR was adjusted for age, gender, body mass index, smoking, regular drinker, hypertension, dyslipidemia, diabetes, office systolic blood pressure, heart rate, left atrial dilatation, and left ventricular hypertrophy by echocardiography. HR, hazard ratio

Hazard ratio of cardiovascular events. (A) Unadjusted HR, (B) adjusted HR. Adjusted HR was adjusted for age, gender, body mass index, smoking, regular drinker, hypertension, dyslipidemia, diabetes, office systolic blood pressure, heart rate, left atrial dilatation, and left ventricular hypertrophy by echocardiography. HR, hazard ratio

Echocardiography parameter and P‐wave duration

Both LA diameter (r = 0.08, P = .02) and left ventricular mass index (r = 0.17, P < .001) were significantly associated with Pmax. The P‐wave duration was linearly associated with the percentage of LAE and LVH on echocardiography (Figure 3).
Figure 3

The percentage of left atrial enlargement and left ventricular hypertrophy in patients with prolonged P‐wave. LAE, left atrial enlargement; Echo‐LVH, left ventricular hypertrophy diagnosed by echocardiography

The percentage of left atrial enlargement and left ventricular hypertrophy in patients with prolonged P‐wave. LAE, left atrial enlargement; Echo‐LVH, left ventricular hypertrophy diagnosed by echocardiography

DISCUSSION

The main result of this study was that prolonged P‐wave duration ≥140 ms was associated with cardiac events in Japanese outpatients with CV risks. Office systolic BP was significantly higher in patients in the Pmax ≥ 140 ms group compared to those in the Pmax < 140 ms group. Finally, increased P‐wave duration was linearly associated with the percentage of LAE and LVH. In this study, P‐wave duration ≥ 140 ms was associated with cardiac events. The cutoff level of prolonged P‐wave varies among previous reports, and no specific definition of prolonged P‐wave has been established. The previously reported data on the relation between P‐wave duration and cardiac events are shown in Table 2. When the cutoff level was Pmax 120 ms and 130 ms, prolonged P‐wave was not associated with cardiac events in our study. On the other hand, when a prolonged P‐wave was defined as Pmax ≥ 140 ms and Pmax ≥ 150 ms, the patients with prolonged P‐wave had significantly higher cardiac events than the others. In our study, subjects with Pmax ≥ 140 ms had a 4.23‐fold greater risk of cardiac events after adjusting for age, gender, body mass index, smoking, regular drinker, hypertension, dyslipidemia, diabetes, office systolic BP, heart rate, and the percentages of LAE and echo‐LVH.
Table 2

Overview of studies of the association between P‐wave duration and events

StudyPopulation Sample sizeAge (y)Men (%)Systolic BP (mmHg)Follow‐up durationEventsCutoff level of P‐wave duration (ms)Hazard ratio (unadjusted)Hazard ratio (adjusted)Adjusting factors
Magnani 12 NHNESⅢ (2011)

White,

Ethnic minorities

Civilian population

(n = 7486)

60 ± 1348134 ± 268.6 years (median)679 CV deaths1402.14Age, gender, race, heart rate, body mass index, smoking, dyslipidemia, hypertension, diabetes
1543.21
Kaykha 13 (2010)

Veterans

Inpatients,

outpatients

In US (n = 40 020)

56 ± 141006.1 years (mean)3417 CV deaths1201.21 (P < .0001)Age, heart rate, BMI
Ha 11 (2018)

Veterans

In US (n = 20 827)

43 ± 89117.8 years (mean)888 CV deaths1201.79 (P < .001)1.53 (P < .001)Age, gender
1403.59 (P < .001)3.08 (P < .001)
Present study

Japanese

Outpatients

with CV risks (n = 810)

63 ± 1151139 ± 166.9 years (median)22 cardiac events1405.08 (P = .001)4.23 (P = .02)Age, gender, heart rate, BMI, smoking, alcohol use, hypertension, dyslipidemia, diabetes, office systolic BP, left atrial enlargement, left ventricular hypertrophy
1505.04 (P = .03)5.01 (P = .04)

Abbreviations: BMI, body mass index; BP, blood pressure; CV, cardiovascular; NHANESⅢ, The Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey.

Overview of studies of the association between P‐wave duration and events White, Ethnic minorities Civilian population (n = 7486) Veterans Inpatients, outpatients In US (n = 40 020) Veterans In US (n = 20 827) Japanese Outpatients with CV risks (n = 810) Abbreviations: BMI, body mass index; BP, blood pressure; CV, cardiovascular; NHANESⅢ, The Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. The cohort analysis in National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey III reported that prolonged P‐wave was significantly associated with CV death and all‐cause mortality. The increase in the risk of CV death conferred by a prolonged P‐wave duration of ≥140 ms was 2.14‐fold and that by a prolonged P‐wave duration ≥154 ms was 3.21‐fold compared to a P‐wave duration of 112 ms In a study of ECGs and CV outcomes at a veterans medical center in the United States, in which the study cohort had a mean age of 56 years and mean follow‐up of 6 years, the P‐wave duration was a significant predictor of CV death after adjusting for age, heart rate, and body mass index. Subjects with a P‐wave duration >120 ms had a 21% greater risk of CV death compared to subjects with a P‐wave duration ≤120 ms Moreover, in a long‐term study at the same center, in which subjects with a mean age of 43 years were followed for a median duration of 17 years, prolonged P‐wave duration was associated with 1.53–3.08 fold in CV death. The reason for the difference in hazard ratios between these previous studies and our present study might be that our present study population consisted of Japanese with CV risks, who were older than the subjects in the previous studies. Generally, P‐wave duration is associated with age and prolonged with aging. , Asians, including Japanese, are more likely to have high salt sensitivity and salt intake than their Western counterparts. The higher salt sensitivity causes cardiac volume overload and pressure overload and might result in heart failure and cardiac events. Office systolic BP in the Pmax ≥ 140 ms group was significantly higher than that in the Pmax < 140 ms group. In a large study with a general population in Finland, high BP was associated with prolonged P‐wave independently of other CV risks. Hypertension is a pathological condition associated with increased cardiac afterload, and increased cardiac afterload leads to an increase in the LV end‐diastolic pressure and further to increases in LA pressure and LA diameter. Kishima et al reported that prolonged P‐wave was independently associated with increased mean LA pressure and that LA size was not associated with P‐wave duration. Faggiano et al reported that the LA pressure measured by cardiac catheterization was more closely related to the signal‐averaged P‐wave duration than to the LA diameter. Prolonged P‐wave on ECG might represent LA remodeling, and LA remodeling was not only lead to developing AF but also played a role in progression of congestive heart failure (Figure 4). Recently, the associations between P‐wave peak time and left ventricular diastolic function were reported. ,
Figure 4

The percentage of left atrial enlargement and left ventricular hypertrophy. LA, left atrial; LV, left ventricular

The percentage of left atrial enlargement and left ventricular hypertrophy. LA, left atrial; LV, left ventricular There has been no report on the relationship among P‐wave duration on ECG, LAE, and LVH on echocardiography and cardiac events. In our study, the degree of prolonged P‐wave was linearly associated with LAE and LVH. The percentages of LAE and LVH were <50% in the Pmax ≥ 140 ms group, while in the Pmax ≥ 150 ms group, they were 50% or above. Even after adjusting for the percentage of LAE, prolonged P‐wave defined as a Pmax ≥ 140 ms was independently associated with cardiac events. Therefore, prolonged P‐wave could be a cardiac event marker even in patients without atrial morphological abnormalities. A standard 12‐lead ECG is a non‐invasive and repeatable test that is available at most institutions. Therefore, P‐wave‐based risk stratification might be useful. This study has several limitations. First, the sample size was relatively small, and small sample size might lead to statistical bias. Second, the subjects consisted exclusively of Japanese outpatients with high CV risks. Third, the left atrial volume is more representative of actual LA size than the anteroposterior diameter on echocardiographic analysis. We were not able to obtain the data on left atrial volume by echocardiography. Thus, the accuracy of the left atrial diameter measurement may have been inadequate, which could have led to underestimation of the impact of atrial morphological remodeling. Further studies in a large population will be needed to examine how a prolonged P‐wave relates to cardiac events and LA/LV load, including left atrial volume.

CONCLUSIONS

The automatically assessed prolonged P‐wave was associated with cardiac events independently of LA enlargement in Japanese patients with CV risks. Further large studies are needed to confirm our findings.

CONFLICT OF INTEREST

K. Kario has received research grants from Omron Healthcare and A&D Co. The other authors have no conflict of interest to declare.

AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONS

Kario K takes primary responsibility for this paper. Yokota A wrote the manuscript and did the statistical analysis. Kario K, Kabutoya T, and Hoshide S collected the patients’ data. Kario K acquired research grants for the J‐HOP study. Yokota A, Kabutoya T, Hoshide S, and Kario K reviewed/edited the manuscript.
  26 in total

1.  Association of interatrial block with development of atrial fibrillation.

Authors:  Yogesh K Agarwal; Wilbert S Aronow; James A Levy; David H Spodick
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  2003-04-01       Impact factor: 2.778

2.  P wave signal-averaged ECG in normal population and in patients with converted atrial fibrillation.

Authors:  Constantin Militaru; Ionut Donoiu; Dan-Dominic Ionescu
Journal:  Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 1.468

3.  Electromechanical dysfunction of the left atrium associated with interatrial block.

Authors:  S B Goyal; D H Spodick
Journal:  Am Heart J       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 4.749

Review 4.  Consensus Document on Improving Hypertension Management in Asian Patients, Taking Into Account Asian Characteristics.

Authors:  Kazuomi Kario; Chen-Huan Chen; Sungha Park; Chang-Gyu Park; Satoshi Hoshide; Hao-Min Cheng; Qi-Fang Huang; Ji-Guang Wang
Journal:  Hypertension       Date:  2018-01-08       Impact factor: 10.190

5.  Advances and challenges in the electrocardiographic diagnosis of left ventricular hypertrophy in hypertensive individuals.

Authors:  Tomoyuki Kabutoya; Satoshi Hoshide; Kazuomi Kario
Journal:  Am J Hypertens       Date:  2020-06-07       Impact factor: 2.689

6.  Correlation of left atrial size with p-wave duration in interatrial block.

Authors:  Vignendra Ariyarajah; Kristin Mercado; Sirin Apiyasawat; Puneet Puri; David H Spodick
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 9.410

7.  The impact of left atrial pressure on filtered P-wave duration in patients with atrial fibrillation.

Authors:  Hideyuki Kishima; Takanao Mine; Satoshi Takahashi; Kenki Ashida; Masaharu Ishihara; Tohru Masuyama
Journal:  Heart Vessels       Date:  2016-01-05       Impact factor: 2.037

Review 8.  Atrial remodeling in varying clinical substrates within beating human hearts: relevance to atrial fibrillation.

Authors:  Saurabh Kumar; Andrew W Teh; Caroline Medi; Peter M Kistler; Joseph B Morton; Jonathan M Kalman
Journal:  Prog Biophys Mol Biol       Date:  2012-08-16       Impact factor: 3.667

9.  Regression of electrocardiographic left ventricular hypertrophy during antihypertensive treatment and the prediction of major cardiovascular events.

Authors:  Peter M Okin; Richard B Devereux; Sverker Jern; Sverre E Kjeldsen; Stevo Julius; Markku S Nieminen; Steven Snapinn; Katherine E Harris; Peter Aurup; Jonathan M Edelman; Hans Wedel; Lars H Lindholm; Björn Dahlöf
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2004-11-17       Impact factor: 56.272

10.  P wave peak time: A time window to evaluate left ventricular diastolic function.

Authors:  Hao-Chih Chang; Hao-Min Cheng
Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)       Date:  2019-04-05       Impact factor: 3.738

View more
  1 in total

1.  Splitting the P-Wave: Improved Evaluation of Left Atrial Substrate Modification after Pulmonary Vein Isolation of Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation.

Authors:  Aikaterini Vraka; Vicente Bertomeu-González; Fernando Hornero; Aurelio Quesada; Raúl Alcaraz; José J Rieta
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2021-12-31       Impact factor: 3.576

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.