N-A Azab1, F-M Zahran, A-A Amin, N-H Rady. 1. Oral Medicine and Periodontology Department Faculty of Dentistry, Cairo University, Egypt 11 El-Saraya St. - Manial - Cairo, Egypt noha.adel@dentistry.cu.edu.eg.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Carcinogenesis is a dynamic process which traditional biopsying can not keep up with. Saliva as fluid in the vicinity of the tumor can offer better insights to this process. This study aimed to identify the accuracy of salivary DNA integrity index in differentiating between oral premalignant lesions and oral cancer. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This phase II diagnostic test accuracy study included 93 patients divided into three groups: 30 oral cancer patients, 33 patients with oral premalignant lesions divided into 21 oral lichen planus patients and 12 patients with leukoplakia and 30 normal individuals who acted as controls. Oral rinse was collected from all participants and they all underwent conventional visual and tactile examination, and patients with oral lesions had the diagnosis confirmed by histopathological examination of tissue biopsy. DNA integrity index was determined as the ratio between ALU247 and ALU115 measured by qPCR. RESULTS: There was no statistically significant difference regarding ALU115, ALU247 and DNA integrity index between the three study groups. The index was significantly higher in the oral cancer group than the oral lichen planus patients, while no significant difference was found between the oral cancer and the leukoplakia cases. The DNA integrity index sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values were 73%, 45%, 55% and 65% respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Salivary DNA integrity index showed poor diagnostic abilities in differentiating between the oral cancer and premalignant lesions.
BACKGROUND: Carcinogenesis is a dynamic process which traditional biopsying can not keep up with. Saliva as fluid in the vicinity of the tumor can offer better insights to this process. This study aimed to identify the accuracy of salivary DNA integrity index in differentiating between oral premalignant lesions and oral cancer. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This phase II diagnostic test accuracy study included 93 patients divided into three groups: 30 oral cancerpatients, 33 patients with oral premalignant lesions divided into 21 oral lichen planus patients and 12 patients with leukoplakia and 30 normal individuals who acted as controls. Oral rinse was collected from all participants and they all underwent conventional visual and tactile examination, and patients with oral lesions had the diagnosis confirmed by histopathological examination of tissue biopsy. DNA integrity index was determined as the ratio between ALU247 and ALU115 measured by qPCR. RESULTS: There was no statistically significant difference regarding ALU115, ALU247 and DNA integrity index between the three study groups. The index was significantly higher in the oral cancer group than the oral lichen planus patients, while no significant difference was found between the oral cancer and the leukoplakia cases. The DNA integrity index sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values were 73%, 45%, 55% and 65% respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Salivary DNA integrity index showed poor diagnostic abilities in differentiating between the oral cancer and premalignant lesions.
Authors: Óscar Rapado-González; José Luis López-Cedrún; Ramón Manuel Lago-Lestón; Alicia Abalo; Guillermo Rubin-Roger; Ángel Salgado-Barreira; Rafael López-López; Laura Muinelo-Romay; María Mercedes Suárez-Cunqueiro Journal: J Oral Pathol Med Date: 2022-04-26 Impact factor: 3.539