Literature DB >> 33339042

Health Coaching Strategies for Weight Loss: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Sofia Mendes Sieczkowska1, Alisson Padilha de Lima1,2, Paul Alan Swinton3, Eimear Dolan1, Hamilton Roschel1, Bruno Gualano1.   

Abstract

Health coaching has emerged as a potential supporting tool for health professionals to overcome behavioral barriers, but its efficacy in weight management remains unclear. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to synthesize and evaluate the quality of evidence supporting the use of self-reported health coaching for weight loss. Seven electronic databases (PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, Cochrane, Psyinfo, Virtual Health Library, and Scielo) were independently searched from inception to May 2020. This review was conducted in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines and quality of evidence was assessed using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation recommendations. Any study that investigated a self-reported health coaching intervention with the goal of inducing weight loss in individuals of any age, health, or training status was considered for inclusion. Quantitative data were analyzed using multilevel hierarchical metaregression models conducted within a Bayesian framework. A total of 653 studies were screened and 38 were selected for inclusion. The quality of evidence supporting outcomes based on the entire evidence base was very low and studies were deemed to have high risk of bias. Meta-analysis of controlled studies provided evidence of an effect favoring coaching compared with usual care but was trivial in magnitude [effect size (ES)0.5: -0.09; 95% credible interval (CrI): -0.17, -0.02]. The multilevel extension of Egger's regression-intercept test indicated the existence of publication bias, whereas a sensitivity analysis based only on those studies deemed to be of high quality provided no evidence of an effect of coaching on weight loss (ES0.5: -0.04; 95% CrI: -0.12, 0.09). Considered collectively, the results of this investigation indicate that the available evidence is not of sufficient quality to support the use of self-reported health coaching as a health care intervention for weight loss. This trial was registered at Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO) as CRD42020159023.
© The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the American Society for Nutrition.

Entities:  

Keywords:  BMI; behavior change; health coaching; waist circumference; weight; weight loss

Year:  2021        PMID: 33339042     DOI: 10.1093/advances/nmaa159

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Adv Nutr        ISSN: 2161-8313            Impact factor:   8.701


  4 in total

1.  Reply to GA Sforzo.

Authors:  Sofia Mendes Sieczkowska; Alisson Padilha de Lima; Paul Alan Swinton; Eimear Dolan; Hamilton Roschel; Bruno Gualano
Journal:  Adv Nutr       Date:  2021-06-01       Impact factor: 11.567

2.  Comment on "Health Coaching: 100 Strategies for Weight Loss: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis".

Authors:  Gary A Sforzo; Margaret Moore; Geoff E Moore; Sebastian Harenberg
Journal:  Adv Nutr       Date:  2021-06-01       Impact factor: 11.567

Review 3.  The Use of Artificial Intelligence-Based Conversational Agents (Chatbots) for Weight Loss: Scoping Review and Practical Recommendations.

Authors:  Han Shi Jocelyn Chew
Journal:  JMIR Med Inform       Date:  2022-04-13

4.  From Young to Older, the 4 Phases Method Is Efficient in Promoting Quick Weight, BMI, and Waist Circumference Reductions.

Authors:  Edson Ramuth; Sylvia Ramuth; Tamaris R R Pavão; Kimberlly B Biacchi; Andre L L Bachi
Journal:  Healthcare (Basel)       Date:  2022-07-27
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.