Literature DB >> 33338440

Concerns and motivations about COVID-19 vaccination.

Rachael H Dodd1, Kristen Pickles2, Brooke Nickel2, Erin Cvejic2, Julie Ayre2, Carys Batcup2, Carissa Bonner2, Tessa Copp2, Samuel Cornell2, Thomas Dakin2, Jennifer Isautier2, Kirsten J McCaffery2.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Year:  2020        PMID: 33338440      PMCID: PMC7832277          DOI: 10.1016/S1473-3099(20)30926-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lancet Infect Dis        ISSN: 1473-3099            Impact factor:   25.071


× No keyword cloud information.
More than 200 COVID-19 vaccines are in development worldwide, with governments securing deals to access advance doses. But access is only one issue. Willingness to accept a COVID-19 vaccine when it becomes available has varied considerably across countries over the course of the pandemic. In The Lancet Infectious Diseases, we presented data collected in Australia in April, 2020, which suggested 86% of people surveyed (3741 of 4362) would be willing to vaccinate against COVID-19 if a vaccine became available. Furthermore, the COCONEL group showed in March, 2020, that 74% of French citizens would vaccinate. Between April and July, 2020, willingness to vaccinate has ranged from 58% in the USA to 64% in the UK and 74% in New Zealand. The New Zealand data showed that the most commonly reported reasons to get vaccinated were to protect family and self, with safety being the chief concern about the vaccine. It is important to investigate both motivations and concerns about a future COVID-19 vaccine to help shape communication strategies. In the latest two surveys from an Australian longitudinal study, participants in June and July, 2020, were asked to respond on a seven-point Likert scale to the statement “If a COVID-19 vaccine becomes available, I will get it” (strongly agree, agree, somewhat agree [yes], neither agree nor disagree (indifferent), and somewhat disagree, disagree, strongly disagree [no]). In June, 2020, 87% (1195 of 1371) of the sample said they would get the COVID-19 vaccine if it became available; in July, 2020, this percentage was 90% (1144 of 1274), a slight increase of 1·91% (95% CI 0·08–3·73; p=0·030, McNemar's test of paired proportions, n=997). The appendix (pp 1–2) presents results of a content analysis showing the most common reasons for willingness or reluctance to get a COVID-19 vaccine, including example free-text responses. The top three reasons across the two surveys for agreeing to vaccinate were “to protect themselves and others” (29% [817 of 2859]), “belief in vaccination and science” (16% [448 of 2859]), and “to help stop the virus spread” (15% [419 of 2859]). Willingness to vaccinate differed by both age (June, p<0·0001; July, p=0·0012) and education (June, p<0·0001; July, p=0·0003; appendix p 3). For those who were indifferent (June, 7% [102 of 1371]; July, 5% [59 of 1274]) or said they would not get the vaccine (June, 5% [74 of 1371]; July, 6% [71 of 1274]), the top reasons across the two surveys were “concern about the safety of the vaccine in its development” (36% [139 of 388]) and “potential side effects” (10% [38 of 388]). Importantly, among people who were willing to vaccinate, some hesitancy was noted regarding safety of the vaccine (11% [311 of 2859]). These findings are important because they highlight some of the determinants of willingness to accept a COVID-19 vaccine if one becomes available. Concerns are not surprising since vaccine development can take 10–15 years. The vaccine development process must be transparent to increase public trust in safety and effectiveness, even for those who are already willing to vaccinate. Involving vaccine communication experts and the public in developing messaging and long-term vaccine strategy is crucial, and governments worldwide should begin preparing these strategies imminently. A prioritisation framework proposed by health economists might aid with the development of these strategies. With the Australian Government aiming for 95% uptake of the COVID-19 vaccine, communication formats used to inform members of the public about a vaccine should be suitable for people with low health literacy and education and appropriate for culturally and linguistically diverse groups and Indigenous populations. Primary-care doctors are likely to be at the forefront of education and administration of a COVID-19 vaccine. Since these doctors are a trusted source, it is important that they are supported in delivering recommendations about the COVID-19 vaccine while alleviating concerns, if we are to reach the vaccine uptake target in Australia. We should not forget about the success of previous novel vaccines and ensure that we build on lessons learned in their implementation, including capitalising on early public enthusiasm shown during a pandemic. We need to understand and address citizen's concerns that can prevent optimal uptake, build motivations into messaging, and prioritise public trust by informing and involving the community in the process. Supporting health-care professionals in their role as educators will ensure people have adequate and accessible information from a trusted source, to optimise vaccine uptake and ultimately reduce community transmission of COVID-19.
  51 in total

1.  Covid-19 vaccine, acceptance, and concern of safety from public perspective in the state of Odisha, India.

Authors:  Dibya Sundar Panda; Ranjan Kumar Giri; Anil Kumar Nagarajappa; Sakeenabi Basha
Journal:  Hum Vaccin Immunother       Date:  2021-05-19       Impact factor: 3.452

2.  Primary Care Interventions to Address COVID-19 Vaccine Hesitancy Among Israel Defense Forces Soldiers.

Authors:  Tomer Talmy; Bar Cohen; Itay Nitzan; Yossi Ben Michael
Journal:  J Community Health       Date:  2021-05-14

3.  COVID-19 Vaccination Perception and Attitude among Healthcare Workers in Egypt.

Authors:  Samar Fares; Merihan M Elmnyer; Shimaa Sabry Mohamed; Radwa Elsayed
Journal:  J Prim Care Community Health       Date:  2021 Jan-Dec

4.  Parents' willingness and attitudes concerning the COVID-19 vaccine: A cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Meltem Yılmaz; Mustafa Kursat Sahin
Journal:  Int J Clin Pract       Date:  2021-05-29       Impact factor: 3.149

5.  The next three epochs: Health system challenges amidst and beyond the COVID-19 era.

Authors:  Anish K Arora
Journal:  Int J Health Plann Manage       Date:  2021-04-17

6.  Correlative imaging using super-resolution fluorescence microscopy and soft X-ray tomography at cryogenic temperatures provides a new way to assess virosome solutions for vaccine development.

Authors:  Chidinma A Okolo; Archana Jadhav; Patrick Phillips; Maud Dumoux; Amanda A McMurray; Vishwas D Joshi; Claire Pizzey; Maria Harkiolaki
Journal:  J Microsc       Date:  2021-09-03       Impact factor: 1.952

7.  As the Pandemic Progresses, How Does Willingness to Vaccinate against COVID-19 Evolve?

Authors:  Stephanie J Alley; Robert Stanton; Matthew Browne; Quyen G To; Saman Khalesi; Susan L Williams; Tanya L Thwaite; Andrew S Fenning; Corneel Vandelanotte
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-01-19       Impact factor: 3.390

8.  Prevalence and Potential Determinants of COVID-19 Vaccine Hesitancy and Resistance in Qatar: Results from a Nationally Representative Survey of Qatari Nationals and Migrants between December 2020 and January 2021.

Authors:  Salma M Khaled; Catalina Petcu; Lina Bader; Iman Amro; Aisha Mohammed H A Al-Hamadi; Marwa Al Assi; Amal Awadalla Mohamed Ali; Kien Le Trung; Abdoulaye Diop; Tarek Bellaj; Mohamed H Al-Thani; Peter W Woodruff; Majid Alabdulla; Peter M Haddad
Journal:  Vaccines (Basel)       Date:  2021-05-07

9.  Contextualising COVID-19 prevention behaviour over time in Australia: Patterns and long-term predictors from April to July 2020 in an online social media sample.

Authors:  Julie Ayre; Erin Cvejic; Kirsten McCaffery; Tessa Copp; Samuel Cornell; Rachael H Dodd; Kristen Pickles; Carys Batcup; Jennifer M J Isautier; Brooke Nickel; Thomas Dakin; Carissa Bonner
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-06-29       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  SARS-COV-2 vaccine acceptance in patients with rheumatic diseases: a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Tina Ko; Claire Dendle; Ian Woolley; Eric Morand; Anna Antony
Journal:  Hum Vaccin Immunother       Date:  2021-08-06       Impact factor: 4.526

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.