Literature DB >> 33338198

Impact of computed tomography window settings on clinical T classifications and prognostic evaluation of patients with subsolid nodules.

Mengmeng Zhao1, Jiajun Deng1, Tingting Wang2, Yingze Li1, Junqi Wu1, Yifang Zhong1, Xiwen Sun2, Gening Jiang1, Yunlang She1, Yuming Zhu1, Dong Xie1, Chang Chen1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To investigate the impact of lung window (LW) and mediastinal window (MW) settings on the clinical T classifications and prognostic prediction of patients with subsolid nodules.
METHODS: Seven hundred and nineteen surgically resected subsolid nodules were reviewed, grouping into pure ground-glass nodules (n = 179) or part-solid nodules (n = 540) using LW. Interobserver agreement on nodule classifications was assessed via kappa-value, and predictive performance of the solid portion measurement in LW and MW for pathological invasiveness and malignancy were compared using receiver-operating characteristic analysis. Cox regression was used to identify prognostic factors. Prognostic significance of T classifications based on LW (c[l]T) and MW (c[m]T) was evaluated by Kaplan-Meier method after propensity score matching. The performance of c(m)T for discrimination survival was estimated via the concordance index (C-index), net reclassification improvement and integrated-discrimination improvement.
RESULTS: By adopting MW, 124 part-solid nodules were reclassified as pure ground-glass nodules, and interobserver agreement improved to 0.917 (95% confidence interval 0.888-0.946). The solid portion size under MW more strongly predicted pathological invasiveness (P = 0.030), but did not better predict pathological malignancy. For remaining 416 part-solid nodules, c(l)T and c(m)T were both independent risk factors. c(m)T led to T classifications shifts in 321 nodules (14 upstaged and 307 downstaged) with no significant prognostic difference existing between the shifted c(m)T and matching c(l)T group after propensity score matching. The corrected C-index was improved to 0.695 (0.620-1.000) when adopting c(m)T with no significant difference in net reclassification improvement (P = 0.098) and integrated-discrimination improvement (P = 0.13) analysis.
CONCLUSIONS: As there is no significant benefit provided by MW in evaluating clinical T classification and prognosis, the current usage of LW is appropriate for assessing subsolid nodules.
© The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Computed tomography window setting; Prognosis; Pulmonary subsolid nodules; T staging

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33338198     DOI: 10.1093/ejcts/ezaa457

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Cardiothorac Surg        ISSN: 1010-7940            Impact factor:   4.191


  2 in total

1.  [Research Progress in 3D-reconstruction Based Imaging Analysis 
in Partial Solid Pulmonary Nodule].

Authors:  Zicheng Liu; He Yang; Hongya Wang; Liang Chen; Quan Zhu
Journal:  Zhongguo Fei Ai Za Zhi       Date:  2022-02-20

2.  Consolidation radiographic morphology can be an indicator of the pathological basis and prognosis of partially solid nodules.

Authors:  Mei Xie; Jie Gao; Xidong Ma; Chongchong Wu; Xuelei Zang; Yuanyong Wang; Hui Deng; Jie Yao; Tingting Sun; Zhaofeng Yu; Sanhong Liu; Guanglei Zhuang; Xinying Xue; Jianlin Wu; Jianxin Wang
Journal:  BMC Pulm Med       Date:  2022-09-28       Impact factor: 3.320

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.