Literature DB >> 33337474

Impact of Sex and Metabolic Comorbidities on Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Mortality Risk Across Age Groups: 66 646 Inpatients Across 613 U.S. Hospitals.

Katherine E Goodman1, Laurence S Magder1, Jonathan D Baghdadi1, Lisa Pineles1, Andrea R Levine2, Eli N Perencevich3, Anthony D Harris1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The relationship between common patient characteristics, such as sex and metabolic comorbidities, and mortality from coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) remains incompletely understood. Emerging evidence suggests that metabolic risk factors may also vary by age. This study aimed to determine the association between common patient characteristics and mortality across age-groups among COVID-19 inpatients.
METHODS: We performed a retrospective cohort study of patients discharged from hospitals in the Premier Healthcare Database between April-June 2020. Inpatients were identified using COVID-19 ICD-10-CM diagnosis codes. A priori-defined exposures were sex and present-on-admission hypertension, diabetes, obesity, and interactions between age and these comorbidities. Controlling for additional confounders, we evaluated relationships between these variables and in-hospital mortality in a log-binomial model.
RESULTS: Among 66 646 (6.5%) admissions with a COVID-19 diagnosis, across 613 U.S. hospitals, 12 388 (18.6%) died in-hospital. In multivariable analysis, male sex was independently associated with 30% higher mortality risk (aRR, 1.30, 95% CI: 1.26-1.34). Diabetes without chronic complications was not a risk factor at any age (aRR 1.01, 95% CI: 0.96-1.06), and hypertension without chronic complications was a risk factor only in 20-39 year-olds (aRR, 1.68, 95% CI: 1.17-2.40). Diabetes with chronic complications, hypertension with chronic complications, and obesity were risk factors in most age-groups, with highest relative risks among 20-39 year-olds (respective aRRs 1.79, 2.33, 1.92; P-values ≤ .002).
CONCLUSIONS: Hospitalized men with COVID-19 are at increased risk of death across all ages. Hypertension, diabetes with chronic complications, and obesity demonstrated age-dependent effects, with the highest relative risks among adults aged 20-39.
© The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press for the Infectious Diseases Society of America.

Entities:  

Keywords:  COVID-19; claims data; hypertension; metabolic comorbidities; sex

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33337474      PMCID: PMC7799326          DOI: 10.1093/cid/ciaa1787

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Infect Dis        ISSN: 1058-4838            Impact factor:   9.079


Despite increased clinical experience with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus -2 (SARS-CoV-2) and its resulting disease, coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19), and a rapidly expanding body of literature, the relationship between common risk factors and mortality from COVID-19 remains incompletely understood. Prior studies have identified male sex, older age, and metabolic comorbidities such as hypertension, obesity, and diabetes as risk factors for poor outcomes and mortality in COVID-19 patients [1-7]. However, these comorbidities often co-occur and are more common among men and older age groups [8-10]. Emerging data also suggest that the effect of metabolic comorbidities on risk of severe COVID-19 outcomes may be age-dependent [11-14]. Without large sample sizes, isolating the independent effects of these clustered characteristics and examining effects by age is challenging. Many studies have also combined comorbidity severities in order to maintain adequate strata sizes, thereby obscuring potentially meaningful clinical granularity. Given that half of American adults are men and more than half have hypertension or diabetes [15, 16], evaluating the precise relationship between these common characteristics and mortality in U.S. patients is important. The availability of large claims databases makes studying these questions possible. To address these knowledge gaps, the objective of the current study was to determine the effect of common patient characteristics on mortality risk across age groups in a large sample of more than 60 000 COVID-19 inpatients across more than 600 geographically diverse U.S. hospitals.

METHODS

Study Design and Data Source

We conducted a retrospective observational cohort study of patients who were discharged from hospitals in the Premier Healthcare Database (“Premier Database”), an all-payer repository of claims and clinical data from more than 120 million U.S. inpatient admissions [17]. Premier Database hospitals cover highly geographically diverse areas across the U.S. and capture approximately 1 of every 4 U.S. hospital discharges (see Supplementary Material for further database detail). Premier internally validates all data before its release into the Premier Database. This study did not include personally identifiable information and was exempt from institutional review board review.

Study Population and COVID-19 Case Definition

All inpatient admissions with discharge dates in the second quarter of 2020 (April, May, and June) and present in the Premier Database as of the data extract date of July 20, 2020 were included in the study. Inpatients were designated as COVID-19 positive if their admission included an ICD-10-CM diagnosis code of “COVID-19” (U07.1). The U07.1 diagnosis code became formally effective for use on April 1, 2020 and is assigned for diagnoses of COVID-19 based upon: (1) documented confirmed or presumptive-positive test results; or (2) a clinical provider’s statement that a patient has COVID-19 (neither documentation of the type of test nor a copy of the test results in the record are required) [18-20]. In order to ensure national uniformity and accurate code usage, substantial governmental and professional organization guidance accompanied release of the U07.1 diagnosis code [18, 19]. We stratified admissions by (a) any COVID-19 diagnosis (principal, secondary, and/or admitting), and (b) admitting and/or principal COVID-19 diagnoses only.

Outcome

The primary study outcome was mortality during the current hospitalization. Because select hospitals may transfer severely ill patients for higher-acuity care, and our analysis includes patients who transferred into Premier Database hospitals, to avoid double-counting some patients we performed sensitivity analyses excluding patients who were discharged to another hospital for acute care.

Collected Data and Primary Patient Characteristics of Interest

For each admission, we extracted data on hospital characteristics, including teaching status, urban versus rural location, and U.S. census geographic region and division. To approximate resource utilization intensity, we calculated each hospital’s monthly percentage of COVID-19 patients and of mechanically ventilated patients. We also extracted the following patient-level data for each admission: (a) admission and discharge characteristics (eg, pre-admission location, discharge location or death, month of admission and discharge); (b) sociodemographics (eg, age, sex, race, and ethnicity); (c) all ICD-10-PCS procedure codes; and (d) all ICD-10-CM diagnosis codes, including whether a diagnosis was present-on-admission. We mapped present-on-admission diagnosis codes to Elixhauser comorbidities using standardized Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) methodology and software [21]. Our primary, a priori-defined patient characteristics of interest were sex and the following Elixhauser comorbidities present-on-admission: hypertension with no other hypertension end-organ complications (herein referred to as “uncomplicated hypertension,” as defined by Elixhauser et al.), hypertension with other end-organ complications (“complicated hypertension,”) uncomplicated and complicated diabetes using the same criteria for end-organ complications, and obesity. As defined in the Elixhauser Comorbidity Index, end-organ complications primarily include heart disease, renal disease, and/or vascular complications [22]. We hypothesized based upon emerging evidence from prior, smaller studies that the effect of the preceding comorbidities on mortality risk may also vary by age [11-14] and tested for age-based interaction effects during model-building (see Statistical Methods).

Statistical Methods

Descriptive statistics for patient and hospital characteristics were calculated using mean (standard deviation [SD]), median (range or interquartile range [IQR]), or frequency count (percentage). We included all patients with COVID-19 diagnoses in the primary study cohort. To calculate age-stratified rates of study outcomes, we categorized age by decade of life. We analyzed the relationship between in-hospital mortality and patient, hospital, and temporal characteristics among adult patients using log-binomial models to estimate relative risk (RR) and corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Based on our a priori hypotheses that the relationship between metabolic comorbidities and mortality may vary by age, we evaluated age-specific interaction terms for complicated and uncomplicated diabetes, complicated and uncomplicated hypertension, and obesity. If these interactions were not statistically significant based upon a global Wald Chi-square test (ie, if the effect of a comorbidity did not differ significantly between age groups), we did not include the interaction between age and the comorbidity in our final model. Our final model therefore included (1) our primary characteristics of interest, which were parameterized separately for each age strata if there was significant interaction between the characteristic and age; and (2) confounding variables (hospital-level variables, temporal variables, and other patient-level variables such as chronic pulmonary disease or liver disease) that were selected a priori through literature review and expert clinical consensus (A. H., E. P., A. L., and J. B.). Because two selected confounders, cardiovascular failure and renal failure, may be complications of hypertension or diabetes, we evaluated these variables for collinearity before including them in the final model. We also performed a sensitivity analysis excluding them. All tests were 2-tailed, and P values ≤ .05 were used for statistical significance testing. Analyses were performed using SAS version 9.4 (SAS Institute Inc.) and STATA 15.0 (Stata Corp.). Log-binomial models were fit using the modified Poisson regression approach described by Zou (2004) [23-25].

RESULTS

During the study period, which included discharges in the second quarter of 2020, we identified 1 028 032 unique admissions across 763 hospitals. 66 646 (6.5%) admissions from 613 hospitals had a COVID-19 diagnosis. Of the COVID-19 admissions, 42 102 (63.1%) had a principal or admitting diagnosis of COVID-19. COVID-19 patients were identified from every U.S. census geographic division. However, the majority (33 148; 49.7% of COVID-19 admissions) were hospitalized in the Middle Atlantic (New York, New Jersey, and Pennsylvania) (see Supplementary Material for geographic distribution data). The mean (SD) age of COVID-19 patients was 62.8 (17.9) years, and 35 246 (52.9%) were male (Table 1). A total of 14 758 (22.1%) COVID-19 patients received ICU-level care, and 10 908 (16.4%) received mechanical ventilation (Table 2). On average, COVID-19 patients had 3 Elixhauser comorbidities (SD, 2.1) present-on-admission. Compared to non-COVID-19 patients, COVID-19 patients were more likely to be Black (22.9% vs. 14.3%) and Hispanic (19.8% vs. 9.9%) (Table 1).
Table 1.

Patient and Hospital Characteristics of COVID-19 and Non-COVID-19 Inpatients Among Discharges in the Second Quarter of 2020

Non-COVID-19 AdmissionsCOVID-19 Admissions
Characteristicn = 961 386 (n, %)n = 66 646 (n, %)
Admission Characteristics
Transfer from another acute care hospital68 038 (7.1%)4806 (7.2%)
Admitted from skilled nursing or intermediate care facility9570 (1.0%)3721 (5.6%)
Admission month
 Pre-March2705 (0.3%)57 (0.1%)
 March58 026 (6.0%)10 033 (15.1%)
 April385 997 (40.2%)37 493 (56.3%)
 May351 607 (36.6%)14 754 (22.1%)
 June163 051 (17.0%)4309 (6.5%)
Hospital length of stay, days (mean, SD)4.46 (7.80)8.46 (10.4)
Demographic Characteristics
Age, mean (SD)46.80 (27.96)62.83 (17.89)
Age decade of life, y
 Less than 10151 289 (15.7%)222 (0.3%)
 10–1922 758 (2.4%)398 (0.6%)
 20–29102 170 (10.6%)2682 (4.0%)
 30–39114 495 (11.9%)4689 (7.0%)
 40–4971 416 (7.4%)6847 (10.3%)
 50–59106 308 (11.1%)11 138 (16.7%)
 60–69140 497 (14.6%)14 343 (21.5%)
 70–79134 510 (14.0%)12 855 (19.3%)
 80 and Older117 943 (12.3%)13 472 (20.2%)
Male sex421 328 (43.8%)35 246 (52.9%)
Race
 White679 239 (70.7%)29 085 (43.6%)
 Black137 275 (14.3%)15 270 (22.9%)
 Unknown46 649 (4.9%)5612 (8.4%)
 Other98 223 (10.2%)16 679 (25.0%)
Hispanic ethnicity94 865 (9.9%)13 178 (19.8%)
Elixhauser Comorbidities, present-on-admission a
 Alcohol abuse52 841 (5.5%)1404 (2.1%)
 Any hypertension422 326 (43.9%)42 813 (64.2%)
 Blood loss anemia21 256 (2.2%)605 (0.9%)
 Chronic peptic ulcer disease8143 (0.9%)358 (0.5%)
 Chronic pulmonary disease170 623 (17.8%)13 606 (20.4%)
 Coagulopathy47 284 (4.9%)5722 (8.6%)
 Congestive heart failure147 780 (15.4%)9893 (14.8%)
 Deficiency anemias156 262 (16.3%)13 583 (20.4%)
 Depression109 163 (11.4%)6827 (10.2%)
 Diabetes, complicated147 724 (15.4%)16 186 (24.3%)
 Diabetes, uncomplicated67 176 (7.0%)9425 (14.1%)
 Fluid and electrolyte disorders232 638 (24.2%)31 237 (46.9%)
 HIV and AIDS1993 (0.2%)216 (0.3%)
 Hypertension, complicated194 661 (20.3%)17 978 (27.0%)
 Hypertension, uncomplicated227 665 (23.7%)24 835 (37.3%)
 Hypothyroidism103 638 (10.8%)8248 (12.4%)
 Liver disease51 189 (5.3%)2698 (4.1%)
 Lymphoma6607 (0.7%)486 (0.7%)
 Metastatic cancer27 104 (2.8%)740 (1.1%)
 Obesity150 659 (15.7%)14 044 (21.1%)
 Other neurological disorders87 275 (9.1%)8329 (12.5%)
 Paralysis23 526 (2.5%)1836 (2.8%)
 Peripheral vascular disease40 991 (4.3%)2159 (3.2%)
 Psychoses44 583 (4.6%)3786 (5.7%)
 Pulmonary circulation disease8428 (0.9%)1250 (1.9%)
 Renal failure144 732 (15.1%)13 770 (20.7%)
 Rheumatoid arthritis/ collagen vascular diseases23 889 (2.5%)1736 (2.6%)
 Solid tumor w/out metastasis22 172 (2.3%)1057 (1.6%)
 Substance use disorder58 762 (6.1%)1123 (1.7%)
 Valvular disease46 290 (4.8%)2198 (3.3%)
 Weight loss49 784 (5.2%)4664 (7.0%)
 Total Elixhauser score, present-on-admission (mean, SD)2.57 (2.40)3.30 (2.10)
Hospital Characteristics
Bed size
 000–09961 851 (6.4%)2032 (3.1%)
 100–199123 812 (12.9%)6295 (9.5%)
 200–299163 154 (17.0%)12 214 (18.3%)
 300–399163 593 (17.0%)14 116 (21.2%)
 400–499117 386 (12.2%)5947 (8.9%)
 500+331 590 (34.5%)26 042 (39.1%)
Urbanb833 394 (86.7%)61 708 (92.6%)
Teaching474 327 (49.3%)42 951 (64.5%)
US Census Divisionc
 East North Central163 758 (17.0%)7452 (11.2%)
 East South Central63 411 (6.6%)1305 (2.0%)
 Middle Atlantic129 720 (13.5%)33 148 (49.7%)
 Mountain39 160 (4.1%)1583 (2.4%)
 New England20 005 (2.1%)2015 (3.0%)
 Pacific87 274 (9.1%)1799 (2.7%)
 South Atlantic260 328 (27.1%)11 983 (17.9%)
 West North Central70 500 (7.3%)2856 (4.3%)
 West South Central127 230 (13.2%)4505 (6.8%)

Abbreviations: COVID-19, coronavirus disease 2019; HIV, human immunodeficiency virus; SD, standard deviation.

a Elixhauser comorbidity categories were modified to include principal diagnoses, in addition to secondary diagnoses, that were present-on-admission. Elixhauser scores represent unweighted Elixhauser comorbidity sums (1 point per comorbidity present-on-admission).

b Designation provided by Premier, based upon American Hospital Association Annual Survey response.

c U.S. census divisions comprise four U.S. census regions: NORTHEAST (Middle Atlantic, New England), SOUTH (South Atlantic, East South Central, West South Central), MIDWEST (East North Central, West North Central), WEST (Mountain, Pacific). States in each U.S. census division are the following: (New England Division): Connecticut, Maine, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, Rhode Island, Vermont; (Middle Atlantic Division): New Jersey, New York, Pennsylvania; (East North Central Division): Illinois, Indiana, Michigan, Ohio, Wisconsin; (West North Central Division): Iowa, Kansas, Minnesota, Missouri, Nebraska, North Dakota, South Dakota; (South Atlantic Division): Delaware, District of Columbia, Florida, Georgia, Maryland, North Carolina, South Carolina, Virginia, West Virginia; (East South Central Division): Alabama, Kentucky, Mississippi, Tennessee; (West South Central Division): Arkansas, Louisiana, Oklahoma, Texas; (Mountain Division): Arizona, Colorado, Idaho, Montana, Nevada, New Mexico, Utah, Wyoming; (Pacific Division): Alaska, California, Hawaii, Oregon, Washington.

Table 2.

In-Hospital Mortality Status by Patient and Hospital Characteristics of COVID-19 Inpatients

CharacteristicsAll COVID-19 PatientsDied in-Hospital
Receipt of ICU-Level Care
 No 51 8886698 (12.9%)
 Yes14 7585690 (38.6%)
 Time-to-ICU, days (mean, SD)a2.8 (3.9)3.4 (5.0)
Receipt of Mechanical Ventilation
 No 55 7386152 (11.0%)
 Yes10 9086236 (57.2%)
 Time-to-ventilation, days (mean, SD)a4.07(13.9)4.70 (18.1)
Admission Characteristics (%)
Admitted from skilled nursing facility
 No62 92511 106 (17.6%)
 Yes37211282 (34.5%)
Transferred from another acute care hospital
 No61 84011 220 (18.1%)
 Yes48061168 (24.3%)
Admission month
 Pre-March5715 (26.3%)
 March10 0332452 (24.4%)
 April37 4937684 (20.5%)
 May14 7541935 (13.1%)
 June4309302 (7.0%)
Length of stay (time-to-death for patients who died in-hospital), days (mean, SD)8.5 (10.4)10.0 (15.5)
Demographic Characteristics (%)
Age, y (mean, SD)62.8 (17.9)73.3 (12.8)
Age, decade of life
 Less than 102222 (0.9%)
 10–193982 (0.5%)
 20–29268242 (1.6%)
 30–394689142 (3.0%)
 40–496847398 (5.8%)
 50–5911 1381183 (10.6%)
 60–6914 3432575 (18.0%)
 70–7912 8553412 (26.5%)
 80 and Older13 4724632 (34.4%)
Male sex
 No31 4005169 (16.5%)
 Yes35 2467219 (20.5%)
Race
 White29 0855935 (20.4%)
 Black15 2702602 (17.0%)
 Other16 6792872 (17.2%)
 Unknown5612979 (17.4%)
Hispanic ethnicity
 No53 46810 680 (20.0%)
 Yes13 1781708 (13.0%)
Elixhauser comorbidities, present-on-admission (%) b
Alcohol abuse
 No65 24212 175 (18.7%)
 Yes1404213 (15.2%)
Hypertension (any)
 No 23 8332960 (12.4%)
 Yes42 8139428 (22.0%)
Blood loss anemia
 No 66 04112 330 (18.7%)
 Yes60558 (9.6%)
Chronic peptic ulcer disease
 No 66 28812 323 (18.6%)
 Yes35865 (18.2%)
Chronic pulmonary disease
 No 53 0409494 (17.9%)
 Yes13 6062894 (21.3%)
Coagulopathy
 No 60 92410 794 (17.7%)
 Yes57221594 (27.9%)
Congestive heart failure
 No 56 7539356 (16.5%)
 Yes98933032 (30.6%)
Deficiency anemias
 No 53 0639141 (17.2%)
 Yes13 5833247 (23.9%)
Depression
 No59 81911 044 (18.5%)
 Yes68271344 (19.7%)
Diabetes, complicated
 No 50 4608307 (16.5%)
 Yes16 1864081 (25.2%)
Diabetes, uncomplicated
 No 57 22110 806 (18.9%)
 Yes94251582 (16.8%)
Fluid and electrolyte disorders
 No 35 4094795 (13.5%)
 Yes31 2377593 (24.3%)
HIV and AIDS
 No 66 43012 352 (18.6%)
 Yes21636 (16.7%)
Hypertension, complicated
 No 48 6687201 (14.8%)
 Yes17 9785187 (28.9%)
Hypertension, uncomplicated
 No 41 8118147 (19.5%)
 Yes24 8354241 (17.1%)
Hypothyroidism
 No 58 39810 440 (17.9%)
 Yes82481948 (23.6%)
Liver disease
 No 63 94811 872 (18.6%)
 Yes2698516 (19.1%)
Lymphoma
 No 66 16012 224 (18.5%)
 Yes486164 (33.7%)
Metastatic cancer
 No 65 90612 141 (18.4%)
 Yes740247 (33.4%)
Obesity
 No 52 60210 077 (19.2%)
 Yes14 0442311 (16.5%)
Other neurological disorders
 No 58 31710 202 (17.5%)
 Yes83292186 (26.2%)
Paralysis
 No 64 81011 823 (18.2%)
 Yes1836565 (30.8%)
Peripheral vascular disease
 No 64 48711 798 (18.3%)
 Yes2159590 (27.3%)
Psychoses
 No 62 86011 592 (18.4%)
 Yes3786796 (21.0%)
Pulmonary circulation disease
 No 65 39612 148 (18.6%)
 Yes1250240 (19.2%)
Renal failure
 No 52 8768230 (15.6%)
 Yes13 7704158 (30.2%)
Rheumatoid arthritis/collagen vascular diseases
 No64 91012 015 (18.5%)
 Yes1736373 (21.5%)
Solid tumor without metastasis
 No65 58912 089 (18.4%)
 Yes1057299 (28.3%)
Substance use disorder
 No 65 52312 276 (18.7%)
 Yes1123112 (10.0%)
Valvular disease
 No 64 44811 760 (18.2%)
 Yes2198628 (28.6%)
Weight loss
 No 61 98211 042 (17.8%)
 Yes46641346 (28.9%)
Total Elixhauser score (mean, SD)3.3 (2.1)4.2 (2.1)
Hospital Characteristics (%)
Bed size
 000–0992032228 (11.2%)
 100–1996295911 (14.5%)
 200–29912 2142551 (20.9%)
 300–39914 1162786 (19.7%)
 400–49959471187 (20.0%)
 500+26 0424725 (18.1%)
Urban hospitalc
 No4938846 (17.1%)
 Yes61 70811 542 (18.7%)
Academic hospital
 No23 6954041 (17.1%)
 Yes42 9518347 (19.4%)

Abbreviations: COVID-19, coronavirus disease 2019; ICU, intensive care unit; SD, standard deviation.

a Calculated only among patients who experienced the outcome (receipt of ICU-level care or mechanical ventilation).

b Elixhauser comorbidity categories were modified to include principal diagnoses, in addition to secondary diagnoses, that were present-on-admission. Elixhauser scores represent unweighted Elixhauser comorbidity sums (1 point per comorbidity present-on-admission).

c Designation provided by Premier, based upon American Hospital Association Annual Survey response.

Patient and Hospital Characteristics of COVID-19 and Non-COVID-19 Inpatients Among Discharges in the Second Quarter of 2020 Abbreviations: COVID-19, coronavirus disease 2019; HIV, human immunodeficiency virus; SD, standard deviation. a Elixhauser comorbidity categories were modified to include principal diagnoses, in addition to secondary diagnoses, that were present-on-admission. Elixhauser scores represent unweighted Elixhauser comorbidity sums (1 point per comorbidity present-on-admission). b Designation provided by Premier, based upon American Hospital Association Annual Survey response. c U.S. census divisions comprise four U.S. census regions: NORTHEAST (Middle Atlantic, New England), SOUTH (South Atlantic, East South Central, West South Central), MIDWEST (East North Central, West North Central), WEST (Mountain, Pacific). States in each U.S. census division are the following: (New England Division): Connecticut, Maine, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, Rhode Island, Vermont; (Middle Atlantic Division): New Jersey, New York, Pennsylvania; (East North Central Division): Illinois, Indiana, Michigan, Ohio, Wisconsin; (West North Central Division): Iowa, Kansas, Minnesota, Missouri, Nebraska, North Dakota, South Dakota; (South Atlantic Division): Delaware, District of Columbia, Florida, Georgia, Maryland, North Carolina, South Carolina, Virginia, West Virginia; (East South Central Division): Alabama, Kentucky, Mississippi, Tennessee; (West South Central Division): Arkansas, Louisiana, Oklahoma, Texas; (Mountain Division): Arizona, Colorado, Idaho, Montana, Nevada, New Mexico, Utah, Wyoming; (Pacific Division): Alaska, California, Hawaii, Oregon, Washington. In-Hospital Mortality Status by Patient and Hospital Characteristics of COVID-19 Inpatients Abbreviations: COVID-19, coronavirus disease 2019; ICU, intensive care unit; SD, standard deviation. a Calculated only among patients who experienced the outcome (receipt of ICU-level care or mechanical ventilation). b Elixhauser comorbidity categories were modified to include principal diagnoses, in addition to secondary diagnoses, that were present-on-admission. Elixhauser scores represent unweighted Elixhauser comorbidity sums (1 point per comorbidity present-on-admission). c Designation provided by Premier, based upon American Hospital Association Annual Survey response.

Mortality Rates and Risk Factors in COVID-19 Inpatients

Overall, 12 388 (18.6%) of COVID-19 patients died in the hospital (Table 2). Figure 1 reflects crude mortality rates by patient age. In-hospital mortality was lowest among pediatric patients. Among adults, mortality increased with each decade of life (1.6%, 20–29 years — 34.4%, 80+ years) (Fig. 1). Across every adult age-strata, men had a higher rate of death compared to women (Supplementary Fig. 1). In the sub-sample of patients with a principal or admitting diagnosis of COVID-19, 6288 (14.9%) died in-hospital (age-stratified rates in Supplementary Fig. 2). When excluding patients transferred on discharge to other acute care hospitals (n = 2171), the percentage of patients with in-hospital mortality in the total cohort rose to 19.2% (12 388/64 475).
Figure 1.

In-hospital mortality by decade of life among inpatients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) diagnoses (n = 66 646).

In-hospital mortality by decade of life among inpatients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) diagnoses (n = 66 646). In a multivariable model controlling for patient, hospital, and temporal characteristics based upon month of admission, male sex was independently associated with a 30% higher risk of death during the admission (adjusted RR, 1.30, 95% CI: 1.26–1.34) (Table 3). The adjusted risk of in-hospital death increased with every decade of life; relative to patients aged 50–59, patients aged 60–69, 70–79, and 80+ had 1.7, 2.7, and 4.3 times the risk of death, respectively (adjusted RRs and 95% CIs: 1.72, 1.53–1.94; 2.70, 2.40–3.03; 4.26, 3.82–4.75). Relative to White race, Black race was associated with lower risk of in-hospital death (adjusted RR 0.90, 95% CI: 0.87–0.94). Admission to an academic hospital was associated with a 7% lower risk of in-hospital death (adjusted RR 0.93, 95% CI: 0.90–0.97) (Table 3).
Table 3.

Association between Patient, Hospital, and Temporal Characteristics and Mortality During the Hospital Admission Among COVID-19 Inpatients in a Multivariable Modela

CharacteristicRelative Risk (aRR) and 95% CI for In-Hospital Death (n = 66 026b) P Value
Transferred from another acute care hospital1.31 (1.24–1.37)<.001
Male sex1.30 (1.26–1.34)<.001
Age, yc
 20–39 0.21 (0.17–0.27)<.001
 40–49 0.47 (0.39–0.57)<.001
 50–59REFREF
 60–69 1.72 (1.53–1.94)<.001
 70–79 2.70 (2.40–3.03)<.001
 80+4.26 (3.82–4.75)<.001
Race
 WhiteREFREF
 Black0.90 (0.87–0.94)<.001
 Unknown1.16 (1.09–1.23)<.001
 Other1.02 (0.98–1.06).37
Hispanic ethnicity0.95 (0.90–0.99).02
Elixhauser Comorbidities, present-on-admissiond
 Congestive heart failure1.16 (1.11–1.21)<.001
 Pulmonary circulation disorders1.04 (0.93–1.16).48
 Chronic pulmonary disease1.02 (0.99–1.06).21
 Liver Disease1.09 (1.01–1.18).03
 Renal failure1.12 (1.07–1.17)<.001
 Malignancye1.30 (1.22–1.38)<.001
 Uncomplicated diabetes1.01 (0.96–1.06).63
Comorbidity score of all other Elixhauser comorbidities not included in the model as binary variables (above), Present-on-Admissionf1.12 (1.11–1.14)<.001
Uncomplicated hypertension by ageg
 20–39 1.68 (1.17–2.40).01
 40–49 1.08 (0.86–1.35).52
 50–590.91 (0.80–1.04).17
 60–69 0.85 (0.78–0.93).001
 70–79 0.87 (0.80–0.95).001
 80+0.81 (0.76–0.87)<.001
Complicated hypertension by ageg
 20–39 2.33 (1.50–3.60)<.001
 40–49 1.88 (1.46–2.42)<.001
 50–591.34 (1.15–1.56)<.001
 60–69 1.03 (0.93–1.14).62
 70–79 0.98 (0.89–1.07).58
 80+0.79 (0.74–0.85)<.001
Diabetes with chronic complications by ageg
 20–39 1.79 (1.23–2.61).002
 40–49 1.44 (1.15–1.80).001
 50–591.23 (1.09–1.39).001
 60–69 1.32 (1.22–1.43)<.001
 70–79 1.13 (1.06–1.20)<.001
 80+1.05 (0.99–1.11).09
Obesity by ageg
 20–39 1.92 (1.43–2.57)<.001
 40–49 1.57 (1.30–1.90)<.001
 50–591.33 (1.19–1.49)<.001
 60–69 1.26 (1.16–1.36)<.001
 70–79 1.16 (1.08–1.25)<.001
 80+1.11 (1.02–1.22).02
Academic hospital0.93 (0.90–0.97)<.001
Urban hospital1.06 (1.00–1.13).05
Admission month
 Pre-MarchN/Ah--
 MarchN/Ah--
 AprilREFREF
 May0.81 (0.77–0.85)<.001
 June0.53 (0.48–0.59)<.001
Hospital’s percentage of COVID-19 patients (monthly)i1.004 (1.003–1.004)<.001
Hospital’s percentage of mechanically ventilated patients (monthly)i1.03 (1.02–1.03)<.001

Abbreviations: aRR, adjusted relative risk; CI, confidence interval; COVID-19, coronavirus disease 2019; N/A, not applicable; REF, reference; RR, relative risk.

aAssocations were evaluated using a multivariable modified poisson regression model with robust variance estimation.

bPatients aged <20 years (n = 620) were excluded from adjusted analyses.

c aRR estimates for each age strata reflect the adjusted effect of age, relative to the reference category of 50–59 years, among those without complicated or uncomplicated hypertension, diabetes with chronic complications, or obesity. For all variables (eg, sex, race) not estimated separately by age group, effect estimates reflect the independent effect of that variable, holding age constant.

dElixhauser comorbidity categories were modified to include principal diagnoses, in addition to secondary diagnoses, that were present-on-admission.

eA combined category of the following Elixhauser comorbidities: lymphoma, metastatic cancer, and solid tumor without metastasis.

fElixhauser scores represent unweighted Elixhauser comorbidity sums (1 point per comorbidity present-on-admission) counting only among Elixhauser comorbidities that were not already included in the model as binary variables. The aRR of 1.12 reflects a 12% increase in mortality risk for each one-unit increase in the Elixhauser comorbidity score, ie, for each additional comorbidity that a patient had present-on-admission, such as fluid and electrolyte disorders or iron-deficiency anemia.

gComorbidity effects were estimated separately for each age group in the final multivariable model if there was evidence of statistically significant effect modification by age based upon a global Wald Chi-square test. Each adjusted RR estimate reflects the adjusted effect of a given comorbidity in patients of this age, holding other factors constant. The reference categories for complicated hypertension and complicated diabetes are patients with no hypertension or no diabetes, respectively.

hPatients were not eligible for cohort inclusion unless they were discharged on or after April 1, 2020. Therefore, adjusted mortality estimates for admission dates prior to April are not validly interpretable, because only patients who survived long enough to be discharged in April are present in the cohort. These patients may not be representative of the broader patient population if mortality is associated with length of stay.

iCalculated to approximate resource-utilization intensity. Variables were calculated by admission month for each hospital as the number of COVID-19 admissions or the number of admissions with mechanical ventilation divided by the total number of the hospital’s admissions during the same month.

Association between Patient, Hospital, and Temporal Characteristics and Mortality During the Hospital Admission Among COVID-19 Inpatients in a Multivariable Modela Abbreviations: aRR, adjusted relative risk; CI, confidence interval; COVID-19, coronavirus disease 2019; N/A, not applicable; REF, reference; RR, relative risk. aAssocations were evaluated using a multivariable modified poisson regression model with robust variance estimation. bPatients aged <20 years (n = 620) were excluded from adjusted analyses. c aRR estimates for each age strata reflect the adjusted effect of age, relative to the reference category of 50–59 years, among those without complicated or uncomplicated hypertension, diabetes with chronic complications, or obesity. For all variables (eg, sex, race) not estimated separately by age group, effect estimates reflect the independent effect of that variable, holding age constant. dElixhauser comorbidity categories were modified to include principal diagnoses, in addition to secondary diagnoses, that were present-on-admission. eA combined category of the following Elixhauser comorbidities: lymphoma, metastatic cancer, and solid tumor without metastasis. fElixhauser scores represent unweighted Elixhauser comorbidity sums (1 point per comorbidity present-on-admission) counting only among Elixhauser comorbidities that were not already included in the model as binary variables. The aRR of 1.12 reflects a 12% increase in mortality risk for each one-unit increase in the Elixhauser comorbidity score, ie, for each additional comorbidity that a patient had present-on-admission, such as fluid and electrolyte disorders or iron-deficiency anemia. gComorbidity effects were estimated separately for each age group in the final multivariable model if there was evidence of statistically significant effect modification by age based upon a global Wald Chi-square test. Each adjusted RR estimate reflects the adjusted effect of a given comorbidity in patients of this age, holding other factors constant. The reference categories for complicated hypertension and complicated diabetes are patients with no hypertension or no diabetes, respectively. hPatients were not eligible for cohort inclusion unless they were discharged on or after April 1, 2020. Therefore, adjusted mortality estimates for admission dates prior to April are not validly interpretable, because only patients who survived long enough to be discharged in April are present in the cohort. These patients may not be representative of the broader patient population if mortality is associated with length of stay. iCalculated to approximate resource-utilization intensity. Variables were calculated by admission month for each hospital as the number of COVID-19 admissions or the number of admissions with mechanical ventilation divided by the total number of the hospital’s admissions during the same month. The association between uncomplicated diabetes (diabetes without chronic complications) and mortality did not significantly vary by age. Uncomplicated diabetes was not a risk factor for in-hospital death (adjusted RR 1.01, 95% CI: 0.96–1.06) (Table 3). The association between other metabolic comorbidities and mortality varied by age (P values ≤ .007), and we estimated the effect of these comorbidities separately for each age group. Uncomplicated hypertension was only a risk factor for in-hospital death among patients aged 20–39 years and was not a risk factor in any other age groups (adjusted RR in 20–39 year-olds, 1.68, 95% CI: 1.17–2.40; P value for interaction = .007). Complicated hypertension, complicated diabetes, and obesity were independent risk factors in most age groups and the relative risks differed significantly by age (P values ≤ .001). The relative risk for each comorbidity was highest among 20–39 year-olds and generally decreased with each decade of life (Table 3 and Supplementary Table 1; P value for trends ≤ .002). Apart from complicated diabetes, which did not maintain an inverse trend with age, all other multivariable model estimates were similar when restricting to patients with principal/admitting COVID-19 diagnoses (Supplementary Table 2).

Temporal Trends

For every adult age group, mortality was lower among patients admitted in May than among patients admitted in April, and equal or lower again among patients admitted in June (Fig. 2). After controlling for patient and hospital characteristics, patients admitted in May averaged a 19% lower risk of death (RR, 0.81, 95% CI: 0.77–0.85) compared to patients admitted in April (Table 3). This estimate accounted for a hospital’s percentage of COVID-19 patients and mechanically ventilated patients during the same time period, which we calculated to approximate a hospital’s resource utilization intensity. As each of these percentages increased, a patient’s mortality risk also independently increased (Table 3).
Figure 2.

In-hospital mortality by decade of life and month of admission among inpatients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) diagnoses (n = 66 646).

In-hospital mortality by decade of life and month of admission among inpatients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) diagnoses (n = 66 646).

DISCUSSION

To our knowledge, this study of 613 U.S. hospitals and more than 66 000 COVID-19 hospitalizations is the largest peer-reviewed and published U.S. study to-date analyzing risk factors and outcomes among patients hospitalized with COVID-19. As expected, mortality rates increased with each decade of life. Notably, mortality rates were higher among adult men compared to women in every decade of life, and male sex was independently associated with a 30% greater risk of mortality during hospitalization. The data also demonstrated that among adult hospitalized patients, patients with uncomplicated diabetes were not at increased risk of death, and patients with uncomplicated hypertension were not at increased risk of death unless they were in the youngest age demographic. Adjusting for many hospital and patient characteristics, patients admitted in May had improved survival compared to patients admitted in April. Our finding that male sex is a risk factor for increased mortality is supported by prior studies [1, 5–7, 26, 27]. However, our study controlled for numerous other comorbid conditions that are more common among men and demonstrated that men have higher mortality than women in every decade of adult life. Thus, we are confident that male sex is a strong, independent risk factor for mortality among hospitalized COVID-19 patients. This finding also comports with hypotheses that immune function differences may explain higher COVID-19 mortality rates in men [28], including recent data demonstrating sex-based differences in COVID-19 immune responses [29]. Previous studies have examined whether hypertension and diabetes are risk factors for mortality in hospitalized COVID-19 patients but have reached conflicting results. These studies generally did not stratify by comorbidity severity or patient age [1–3, 30]. Our large sample permitted a more detailed evaluation of hypertension and diabetes as risk factors. Unexpectedly, uncomplicated diabetes was not associated with in-hospital mortality in any age group, and uncomplicated hypertension was only associated with in-hospital mortality among adults in their 20s and 30s after adjustment for other model variables. Understanding that most hypertensive or diabetic patients are not at increased risk of death compared to other comparable hospitalized patients, provided they do not have additional complications such as heart disease or renal failure, may guide resource allocation and intervention efforts among hospitalized patients. In contrast, complicated diabetes, complicated hypertension, and obesity were strong, independent risk factors for death in most age groups. As with uncomplicated hypertension, these comorbidities demonstrated pronounced age-specific trends that persisted in full multivariable models. The relative risk for each of these comorbidities was highest among 20–39 year-olds, after which it generally decreased with each subsequent decade of life (P value tests for trend all ≤ .002). After age 59, complicated hypertension was not associated with increased mortality risk, and once patients reached the oldest age group (80+ years), complicated diabetes was also no longer associated with increased mortality risk. Obesity was an independent risk factor for all age groups, consistent with a recent meta-analysis [31]. However, the magnitude of its effect decreased with age. This finding extends observations from 3 previous, smaller studies in U.S. hospitalized patients which found that the effect of obesity on risk of severe COVID-19 outcomes was greater in younger patients [12-14]. Our findings suggest that among hospitalized patients, young adults are particularly vulnerable from metabolic comorbidities. Better understanding whether differences in metabolic phenotypes or biological pathways, such as inflammatory processes [32], in younger patients may underlie our observed associations would be an important area of future study. Moreover, the role of common antihypertensive and diabetes medications, including angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors and metformin, on COVID-19 clinical outcomes has become an active research area, with emerging research suggesting possibly protective effects [33-37]. National cohorts have documented age-based differences in antihypertensive and diabetes medication prescribing patterns and disease control among U.S. adults [38-40]. Evaluating whether differences in metabolic disease control and medication usage between younger and older adults mediate COVID-19 mortality risk would be an important area for future research. Yet even without a full understanding of why young hospitalized adults with these comorbidities face higher mortality risks, these findings may still inform current clinical decision-making, such as earlier or more aggressive therapeutic intervention in younger patients with these comorbidities. They may also suggest, although they cannot definitively establish, that lifestyle modifications to reduce body mass index and blood pressure might reduce COVID-19 mortality risk in younger adults [11, 12, 41, 42]. Ultimately, although the absolute mortality among young patients with comorbidities may still be less than older patients with no comorbidities, the years of potential life lost among young patients is greater, making these findings important. Our study consists of hospitalized patients and should not be generalized to the wider population of all individuals who acquire COVID-19 infection. For example, Black race and/or Hispanic ethnicity were associated with lower mortality risk in adjusted models. This finding is consistent with some prior studies [43, 44]. However, these and other studies have also observed that Black and/or Hispanic patients are hospitalized for COVID-19 at higher rates than White patients [43-45], and we observed that Black and/or Hispanic patients were over-represented among COVID-19 admissions in our cohort. Our study was not designed to determine whether specific characteristics or comorbidities are risk factors among the broader population of infected patients. This study is a retrospective analysis of administrative claims data and is therefore subject to several limitations. First, claims data may misclassify some patient characteristics, and the U07.1 COVID-19 code has not been externally validated. However, many strong COVID-19 risk factors (eg, age, sex) are robustly captured in claims data; we identified COVID-19 patients and Elixhauser comorbidities using the same standardized ICD-10-CM diagnosis code sets that are used for national COVID-19 surveillance; and clinician statements that a patient has COVID-19 will support use of the U07.1 code even where testing may have been unavailable [18, 21, 46, 47]. Moreover, isolated elevated blood pressure or glucose readings are insufficient to trigger hypertension or diabetes codes [48]. Rather, there are separate codes for elevated readings without formal diagnoses, thus reducing the risk that features of patients’ COVID-19 clinical course at admission would be miscategorized as pre-existing comorbidities [49, 50]. Second, although routine COVID-19 screening was not widespread during the cohort period, it is possible that some cohort patients were identified incidentally through hospital-based screening. We therefore performed sensitivity analyses restricted to only the subset of patients with principal or admitting COVID-19 diagnoses, and results were substantially similar to primary analyses. Third, although our database included a large and diverse number of U.S. hospitals, regions where COVID-19 was most prevalent in the second quarter of 2020 were over-represented, and state-level data were not available. We also did not have outpatient mortality or medication data. Investigating whether age-dependent differences in the effect of metabolic comorbidities on mortality risk persist after accounting for use of antihypertensive and diabetes medications would be an important area of future study. Finally, due to our data extract date, some longer June and possibly late May admissions may not be in our cohort. If longer admissions have different mortality rates, this could have introduced some bias, although our findings comport with large international studies and a study in one U.S. health system that have also identified improving survival in hospitalized patients [51-53]. More research is necessary to investigate reasons for declining mortality, such as clinical practice changes and new therapeutics. This study of more than 66 000 COVID-19 hospitalizations across 613 U.S. hospitals found that even after controlling for many co-occurring characteristics, men face a 30% greater risk of in-hospital mortality compared to women. Given that half of U.S. adults are men, population-based interventions and COVID-19 prevention efforts that target men could have a significant public health impact. Moreover, we found that 20–39 year-olds are especially vulnerable from metabolic comorbidities, including uncomplicated hypertension and obesity, compared to older age groups. Although the absolute mortality risk remains lower among 20–39 year-olds, the years of life lost in these patients are significant. Our findings suggest this is a higher-risk subgroup whom prevention efforts should not neglect.

Supplementary Data

Supplementary materials are available at Clinical Infectious Diseases online. Consisting of data provided by the authors to benefit the reader, the posted materials are not copyedited and are the sole responsibility of the authors, so questions or comments should be addressed to the corresponding author. Click here for additional data file.
  33 in total

1.  Age at type 2 diabetes onset and glycaemic control: results from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) 2005-2010.

Authors:  Seth A Berkowitz; James B Meigs; Deborah J Wexler
Journal:  Diabetologia       Date:  2013-09-01       Impact factor: 10.122

2.  Outcomes from intensive care in patients with COVID-19: a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies.

Authors:  R A Armstrong; A D Kane; T M Cook
Journal:  Anaesthesia       Date:  2020-07-15       Impact factor: 6.955

3.  Initial Glycemic Control and Care Among Younger Adults Diagnosed With Type 2 Diabetes.

Authors:  Anjali Gopalan; Pranita Mishra; Stacey E Alexeeff; Maruta A Blatchins; Eileen Kim; Alan Man; Andrew J Karter; Richard W Grant
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2020-03-04       Impact factor: 19.112

4.  Obesity in Patients Younger Than 60 Years Is a Risk Factor for COVID-19 Hospital Admission.

Authors:  Jennifer Lighter; Michael Phillips; Sarah Hochman; Stephanie Sterling; Diane Johnson; Fritz Francois; Anna Stachel
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2020-07-28       Impact factor: 9.079

5.  Baseline Characteristics and Outcomes of 1591 Patients Infected With SARS-CoV-2 Admitted to ICUs of the Lombardy Region, Italy.

Authors:  Giacomo Grasselli; Alberto Zangrillo; Alberto Zanella; Massimo Antonelli; Luca Cabrini; Antonio Castelli; Danilo Cereda; Antonio Coluccello; Giuseppe Foti; Roberto Fumagalli; Giorgio Iotti; Nicola Latronico; Luca Lorini; Stefano Merler; Giuseppe Natalini; Alessandra Piatti; Marco Vito Ranieri; Anna Mara Scandroglio; Enrico Storti; Maurizio Cecconi; Antonio Pesenti
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2020-04-28       Impact factor: 56.272

6.  Body Mass Index and Risk for Intubation or Death in SARS-CoV-2 Infection : A Retrospective Cohort Study.

Authors:  Michaela R Anderson; Joshua Geleris; David R Anderson; Jason Zucker; Yael R Nobel; Daniel Freedberg; Jennifer Small-Saunders; Kartik N Rajagopalan; Richard Greendyk; Sae-Rom Chae; Karthik Natarajan; David Roh; Ethan Edwin; Dympna Gallagher; Anna Podolanczuk; R Graham Barr; Anthony W Ferrante; Matthew R Baldwin
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2020-07-29       Impact factor: 25.391

7.  Risk factors for mortality among COVID-19 patients.

Authors:  Orwa Albitar; Rama Ballouze; Jer Ping Ooi; Siti Maisharah Sheikh Ghadzi
Journal:  Diabetes Res Clin Pract       Date:  2020-07-03       Impact factor: 5.602

8.  Antecedent Administration of Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors or Angiotensin II Receptor Antagonists and Survival After Hospitalization for COVID-19 Syndrome.

Authors:  Alberto Palazzuoli; Massimo Mancone; Gaetano M De Ferrari; Giovanni Forleo; Gioel G Secco; Gaetano M Ruocco; Fabrizio D'Ascenzo; Silvia Monticone; Anita Paggi; Marco Vicenzi; Anna G Palazzo; Maurizio Landolina; Erika Taravelli; Guido Tavazzi; Francesco Blasi; Fabio Infusino; Francesco Fedele; Francesco G De Rosa; Michael Emmett; Jeffrey M Schussler; Kristen M Tecson; Peter A McCullough
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2020-10-07       Impact factor: 5.501

9.  Sitagliptin Treatment at the Time of Hospitalization Was Associated With Reduced Mortality in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes and COVID-19: A Multicenter, Case-Control, Retrospective, Observational Study.

Authors:  Sebastiano Bruno Solerte; Francesca D'Addio; Roberto Trevisan; Elisabetta Lovati; Antonio Rossi; Ida Pastore; Marco Dell'Acqua; Elio Ippolito; Cristiana Scaranna; Rosalia Bellante; Silvia Galliani; Alessandro Roberto Dodesini; Giuseppe Lepore; Francesca Geni; Roberta Maria Fiorina; Emanuele Catena; Angelo Corsico; Riccardo Colombo; Marco Mirani; Carlo De Riva; Salvatore Endrio Oleandri; Reza Abdi; Joseph V Bonventre; Stefano Rusconi; Franco Folli; Antonio Di Sabatino; Gianvincenzo Zuccotti; Massimo Galli; Paolo Fiorina
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2020-09-29       Impact factor: 19.112

10.  Diabetes mellitus increases the risk of hospital mortality in patients with Covid-19: Systematic review with meta-analysis.

Authors:  Larry E Miller; Ruemon Bhattacharyya; Anna L Miller
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2020-10-02       Impact factor: 1.817

View more
  25 in total

1.  The impact of body composition on mortality of COVID-19 hospitalized patients: A prospective study on abdominal fat, obesity paradox and sarcopenia.

Authors:  Elena Graziano; Maddalena Peghin; Maria De Martino; Chiara De Carlo; Andrea Da Porto; Luca Bulfone; Viviana Casarsa; Emanuela Sozio; Martina Fabris; Adriana Cifù; Bruno Grassi; Francesco Curcio; Miriam Isola; Leonardo Alberto Sechi; Carlo Tascini
Journal:  Clin Nutr ESPEN       Date:  2022-07-19

2.  Investigating Cellular Trajectories in the Severity of COVID-19 and Their Transcriptional Programs Using Machine Learning Approaches.

Authors:  Hyun-Hwan Jeong; Johnathan Jia; Yulin Dai; Lukas M Simon; Zhongming Zhao
Journal:  Genes (Basel)       Date:  2021-04-24       Impact factor: 4.096

3.  Low birth weight as a potential risk factor for severe COVID-19 in adults.

Authors:  Fàtima Crispi; Francesca Crovetto; Alvar Agustí; Eduard Gratacós; Marta Larroya; Marta Camacho; Marta Tortajada; Oriol Sibila; Joan Ramon Badia; Marta López; Kilian Vellvé; Ferran Garcia; Antoni Trilla; Rosa Faner; Isabel Blanco; Roger Borràs
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-02-03       Impact factor: 4.379

4.  Association of Toll-like receptor 7 variants with life-threatening COVID-19 disease in males: findings from a nested case-control study.

Authors:  Chiara Fallerini; Sergio Daga; Stefania Mantovani; Elisa Benetti; Nicola Picchiotti; Daniela Francisci; Francesco Paciosi; Elisabetta Schiaroli; Margherita Baldassarri; Francesca Fava; Maria Palmieri; Serena Ludovisi; Francesco Castelli; Eugenia Quiros-Roldan; Massimo Vaghi; Stefano Rusconi; Matteo Siano; Maria Bandini; Ottavia Spiga; Katia Capitani; Simone Furini; Francesca Mari; Alessandra Renieri; Mario U Mondelli; Elisa Frullanti
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2021-03-02       Impact factor: 8.140

Review 5.  Aging versus youth: Endocrine aspects of vulnerability for COVID-19.

Authors:  Seda Hanife Oguz; Meltem Koca; Bulent Okan Yildiz
Journal:  Rev Endocr Metab Disord       Date:  2021-04-16       Impact factor: 9.306

6.  Unexpectedly lower mortality rates in COVID-19 patients with and without type 2 diabetes in Istanbul.

Authors:  Ilhan Satman; Ibrahim Demirci; Cem Haymana; Ilker Tasci; Serpil Salman; Naim Ata; Selcuk Dagdelen; Ibrahim Sahin; Rifat Emral; Erman Cakal; Aysegul Atmaca; Mustafa Sahin; Osman Celik; Tevfik Demir; Derun Ertugrul; Ugur Unluturk; Kazim Yalcin Arga; Murat Caglayan; Alper Sonmez
Journal:  Diabetes Res Clin Pract       Date:  2021-03-17       Impact factor: 5.602

7.  Plasma Proteome Fingerprints Reveal Distinctiveness and Clinical Outcome of SARS-CoV-2 Infection.

Authors:  Wolfgang Bauer; Marcus Weber; Eva Diehl-Wiesenecker; Noa Galtung; Monika Prpic; Rajan Somasundaram; Rudolf Tauber; Jochen M Schwenk; Patrick Micke; Kai Kappert
Journal:  Viruses       Date:  2021-12-07       Impact factor: 5.048

8.  Age-Related Risk Factors and Complications of Patients With COVID-19: A Population-Based Retrospective Study.

Authors:  Han Zhang; Yingying Wu; Yuqing He; Xingyuan Liu; Mingqian Liu; Yuhong Tang; Xiaohua Li; Guang Yang; Gang Liang; Shabei Xu; Minghuan Wang; Wei Wang
Journal:  Front Med (Lausanne)       Date:  2022-01-11

9.  Demographics, comorbidities, and outcomes among young and middle-aged COVID-19 patients in Saudi Arabia.

Authors:  Amer S Alali; Abdulaziz O Alshehri; Ahmed Assiri; Shahd Khan; Munirah A Alkathiri; Omar A Almohammed; Waleed Badoghaish; Saeed M AlQahtani; Musaad A Alshammari; Mohamed Mohany; Faisal F Alamri; Yazed AlRuthia; Faleh Alqahtani
Journal:  Saudi Pharm J       Date:  2021-06-19       Impact factor: 4.330

10.  Effective Containment of a COVID-19 Subregional Outbreak in Italy Through Strict Quarantine and Rearrangement of Local Health Care Services.

Authors:  Sara Tedeschi; Lorenzo Badia; Fabio Berveglieri; Rodolfo Ferrari; Simona Coladonato; Sabrina Gabrielli; Antonio Maestri; Gabriele Peroni; Maddalena Giannella; Andrea Rossi; Pierluigi Viale
Journal:  Open Forum Infect Dis       Date:  2021-01-19       Impact factor: 3.835

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.