Literature DB >> 33337341

Electronic Cognitive Screen Technology for Screening Older Adults With Dementia and Mild Cognitive Impairment in a Community Setting: Development and Validation Study.

Joyce Y C Chan1, Adrian Wong1,2, Brian Yiu1, Hazel Mok1, Patti Lam3, Pauline Kwan1, Amany Chan3, Vincent C T Mok1,2,4, Kelvin K F Tsoi5, Timothy C Y Kwok1,2,3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: A digital cognitive test can be a useful and quick tool for the screening of cognitive impairment. Previous studies have shown that the diagnostic performance of digital cognitive tests is comparable with that of conventional paper-and-pencil tests. However, the use of commercially available digital cognitive tests is not common in Hong Kong, which may be due to the high cost of the tests and the language barrier. Thus, we developed a brief and user-friendly digital cognitive test called the Electronic Cognitive Screen (EC-Screen) for the detection of mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and dementia of older adults.
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the performance of the EC-Screen for the detection of MCI and dementia in older adults.
METHODS: The EC-Screen is a brief digital cognitive test that has been adapted from the Rapid Cognitive Screen test. The EC-Screen uses a cloud-based platform and runs on a tablet. Participants with MCI, dementia, and cognitively healthy controls were recruited from research clinics and the community. The outcomes were the performance of the EC-Screen in distinguishing participants with MCI and dementia from controls, and in distinguishing participants with dementia from those with MCI and controls. The cohort was randomly split into derivation and validation cohorts based on the participants' disease group. In the derivation cohort, the regression-derived score of the EC-Screen was calculated using binomial logistic regression. Two predictive models were produced. The first model was used to distinguish participants with MCI and dementia from controls, and the second model was used to distinguish participants with dementia from those with MCI and controls. Receiver operating characteristic curves were constructed and the areas under the curves (AUCs) were calculated. The performances of the two predictive models were tested using the validation cohorts. The relationship between the EC-Screen and paper-and-pencil Montreal Cognitive Assessment-Hong Kong version (HK-MoCA) was evaluated by the Pearson correlation coefficient.
RESULTS: A total of 126 controls, 54 participants with MCI, and 63 participants with dementia were included in the study. In differentiating participants with MCI and dementia from controls, the AUC of the EC-Screen in the derivation and validation cohorts was 0.87 and 0.84, respectively. The optimal sensitivity and specificity in the derivation cohorts were 0.81 and 0.80, respectively. In differentiating participants with dementia from those with MCI and controls, the AUC of the derivation and validation cohorts was 0.90 and 0.88, respectively. The optimal sensitivity and specificity in the derivation cohort were 0.83 and 0.83, respectively. There was a significant correlation between the EC-Screen and HK-MoCA (r=-0.67, P<.001).
CONCLUSIONS: The EC-Screen is suggested to be a promising tool for the detection of MCI and dementia. This test can be self-administered or assisted by a nonprofessional staff or family member. Therefore, the EC-Screen can be a useful tool for case finding in primary health care and community settings. ©Joyce Y C Chan, Adrian Wong, Brian Yiu, Hazel Mok, Patti Lam, Pauline Kwan, Amany Chan, Vincent C T Mok, Kelvin K F Tsoi, Timothy C Y Kwok. Originally published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research (http://www.jmir.org), 18.12.2020.

Entities:  

Keywords:  EC-Screen; cognitive screening; dementia; mild cognitive impairment

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 33337341      PMCID: PMC7775823          DOI: 10.2196/17332

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Med Internet Res        ISSN: 1438-8871            Impact factor:   5.428


  31 in total

1.  Sample size calculation should be performed for design accuracy in diagnostic test studies.

Authors:  Antoine Flahault; Michel Cadilhac; Guy Thomas
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 6.437

2.  Tracking Cognitive Performance in the General Population and in Patients with Mild Cognitive Impairment with a Self-Applied Computerized Test (Brain on Track).

Authors:  Luis Ruano; Milton Severo; Andreia Sousa; Catarina Ruano; Mariana Branco; Rui Barreto; Sandra Moreira; Natália Araújo; Paula Pinto; Joana Pais; Nuno Lunet; Vítor Tedim Cruz
Journal:  J Alzheimers Dis       Date:  2019       Impact factor: 4.472

Review 3.  Clinical practice. Mild cognitive impairment.

Authors:  Ronald C Petersen
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2011-06-09       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 4.  The global prevalence of dementia: a systematic review and metaanalysis.

Authors:  Martin Prince; Renata Bryce; Emiliano Albanese; Anders Wimo; Wagner Ribeiro; Cleusa P Ferri
Journal:  Alzheimers Dement       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 21.566

5.  Montreal Cognitive Assessment: One Cutoff Never Fits All.

Authors:  Adrian Wong; Lorraine S N Law; Wenyan Liu; Zhaolu Wang; Eugene S K Lo; Alexander Lau; Lawrence K S Wong; Vincent C T Mok
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2015-10-15       Impact factor: 7.914

6.  Comparison of Computerized and Paper-and-Pencil Memory Tests in Detection of Mild Cognitive Impairment and Dementia: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Diagnostic Studies.

Authors:  Joyce Y C Chan; Joey S W Kwong; Adrian Wong; Timothy C Y Kwok; Kelvin K F Tsoi
Journal:  J Am Med Dir Assoc       Date:  2018-06-18       Impact factor: 4.669

7.  The Digital Tree Drawing Test for Screening of Early Dementia: An Explorative Study Comparing Healthy Controls, Patients with Mild Cognitive Impairment, and Patients with Early Dementia of the Alzheimer Type.

Authors:  Sibylle Robens; Petra Heymann; Regine Gienger; Andreas Hett; Stephan Müller; Christoph Laske; Roland Loy; Thomas Ostermann; Ulrich Elbing
Journal:  J Alzheimers Dis       Date:  2019       Impact factor: 4.472

8.  Computer assessment of mild cognitive impairment.

Authors:  Judith Saxton; Lisa Morrow; Amy Eschman; Gretchen Archer; James Luther; Anthony Zuccolotto
Journal:  Postgrad Med       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 3.840

Review 9.  Thirty-Five Years of Computerized Cognitive Assessment of Aging-Where Are We Now?

Authors:  Avital Sternin; Alistair Burns; Adrian M Owen
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2019-09-06

Review 10.  Computerized Neurocognitive Test (CNT) in mild cognitive impairment and Alzheimer's disease.

Authors:  Maira Okada de Oliveira; Sonia Maria Dozzi Brucki
Journal:  Dement Neuropsychol       Date:  2014 Apr-Jun
View more
  2 in total

1.  A voice recognition-based digital cognitive screener for dementia detection in the community: Development and validation study.

Authors:  Xuhao Zhao; Ruofei Hu; Haoxuan Wen; Guohai Xu; Ting Pang; Xindi He; Yaping Zhang; Ji Zhang; Christopher Chen; Xifeng Wu; Xin Xu
Journal:  Front Psychiatry       Date:  2022-07-22       Impact factor: 5.435

Review 2.  Digital Cognitive Biomarker for Mild Cognitive Impairments and Dementia: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Zihan Ding; Tsz-Lok Lee; Agnes S Chan
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-07-19       Impact factor: 4.964

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.