Literature DB >> 33336623

Knowledge about the nature of science increases public acceptance of science regardless of identity factors.

Deena Skolnick Weisberg1, Asheley R Landrum2, Jesse Hamilton, Michael Weisberg3.   

Abstract

While people's views about science are related to identity factors (e.g. political orientation) and to knowledge of scientific theories, knowledge about how science works in general also plays an important role. To test this claim, we administered two detailed assessments about the practices of science to a demographically representative sample of the US public (N = 1500), along with questions about the acceptance of evolution, climate change, and vaccines. Participants' political and religious views predicted their acceptance of scientific claims, as in prior work. But a greater knowledge of the nature of science and a more mature view of how to mitigate scientific disagreements each related positively to acceptance. Importantly, the positive effect of scientific thinking on acceptance held regardless of participants' political ideology or religiosity. Increased attention to developing people's knowledge of how science works could thus help to combat resistance to scientific claims across the political and religious spectrum.

Entities:  

Keywords:  climate change; epistemological style; evolution; nature of science; philosophy of science; public understanding of science

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 33336623     DOI: 10.1177/0963662520977700

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Public Underst Sci        ISSN: 0963-6625


  6 in total

1.  Trust, Science Education and Vaccines.

Authors:  Michael J Reiss
Journal:  Sci Educ (Dordr)       Date:  2022-04-26       Impact factor: 2.921

2.  Do We Have a Trust Problem? Exploring Undergraduate Student Views on the Tentativeness and Trustworthiness of Science.

Authors:  William W Cobern; Betty Aj Adams; Brandy A-S Pleasants; Andrew Bentley; Robert Kagumba
Journal:  Sci Educ (Dordr)       Date:  2022-01-09       Impact factor: 2.921

3.  What do COVID-19 Tweets Reveal about Public Engagement with Nature of Science?

Authors:  David B Bichara; Zoubeida R Dagher; Hui Fang
Journal:  Sci Educ (Dordr)       Date:  2021-07-21       Impact factor: 2.921

4.  How a few poorly designed COVID-19 studies may have contributed to misinformation in Brazil: the case for evidence-based communication of science.

Authors:  Charles Phiilipe de Lucena Alves; João de Deus Barreto Segundo; Gabriel Gonçalves da Costa; Tatiana Pereira-Cenci; Kenio Costa Lima; Flávio Fernando Demarco; Inácio Crochemore-Silva
Journal:  BMJ Open Sci       Date:  2021-09-02

5.  Charting cognition: Mapping public understanding of COVID-19.

Authors:  Natasha A Strydhorst; Asheley R Landrum
Journal:  Public Underst Sci       Date:  2022-03-11

6.  Improving the politics of biotechnological innovations in food security and other sustainable development goals.

Authors:  Alan Raybould
Journal:  Transgenic Res       Date:  2021-08-05       Impact factor: 2.788

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.