| Literature DB >> 33336616 |
Mauro Biffi1, Claudio Capobianco1,2, Alberto Spadotto1,2, Lorenzo Bartoli1,2, Sergio Sorrentino1,2, Alessandro Minguzzi1,2, Giuseppe Pio Piemontese1,2, Andrea Angeletti1,2, Sebastiano Toniolo1,2, Giovanni Statuto1,2.
Abstract
Introduction: Cardiac stimulation evolved from life-saving devices to prevent asystole to the treatment of heart rhythm disorders and heart failure, capable of remote patient and disease-progression monitoring. Cardiac stimulation nowadays aims to correct the electrophysiologic roots of mechanical inefficiency in different structural heart diseases.Areas covered: Clinical experience, as per available literature, has led to awareness of the concealed risks of customary cardiac pacing, that can inadvertently cause atrio-ventricular and inter/intra-ventricular dyssynchrony. New pacing modalities have emerged, leading to a new concept of what truly represents 'physiologic pacing' beyond maintenance of atrio-ventricular coupling. In this article we will analyze the emerging evidence in favor of the available strategies to achieve an individualized physiologic setting in bradycardia pacing, and the hints of future developments.Expert opinion: 'physiologic stimulation' technologies should evolve to enable an effective and widespread adoption. In one way new guiding catheters and the adoption of electrophysiologic guidance and non-fluoroscopic lead implantation are needed to make His-Purkinje pacing successful and effective at long term in a shorter procedure time; in the other way leadless stimulation needs to upgrade to a superior physiologic setting to mimic customary DDD pacing and possibly His-Purkinje pacing.Entities:
Keywords: Atrio-ventricular coupling; clinical outcome; conduction system disease; individualized therapy; leadless Pacemaker; physiologic pacing
Year: 2020 PMID: 33336616 DOI: 10.1080/17434440.2021.1866543
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Expert Rev Med Devices ISSN: 1743-4440 Impact factor: 3.166