Literature DB >> 33336451

Spatial process decomposition for quantitative imaging biomarkers using multiple images of varying shapes.

ShengLi Tzeng1, Jun Zhu2, Amy J Weisman3, Tyler J Bradshaw3, Robert Jeraj3,4.   

Abstract

Quantitative imaging biomarkers (QIB) are extracted from medical images in radiomics for a variety of purposes including noninvasive disease detection, cancer monitoring, and precision medicine. The existing methods for QIB extraction tend to be ad hoc and not reproducible. In this article, a general and flexible statistical approach is proposed for handling up to three-dimensional medical images and reasonably capturing features with respect to specific spatial patterns. In particular, a model-based spatial process decomposition is developed where the random weights are unique to individual patients for component functions common across patients. Model fitting and selection are based on maximum likelihood, while feature extractions are via optimal prediction of the underlying true image. Simulation studies are conducted to investigate the properties of the proposed methodology. For illustration, a cancer image data set is analyzed and QIBs are extracted in association with a clinical endpoint.
© 2020 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  biomarker; medical image; multiresolution model; radiomics; spatial statistics

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 33336451      PMCID: PMC8848296          DOI: 10.1002/sim.8838

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stat Med        ISSN: 0277-6715            Impact factor:   2.373


  9 in total

Review 1.  Biomarkers and surrogate endpoints: preferred definitions and conceptual framework.

Authors: 
Journal:  Clin Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 6.875

2.  Comparison of tree-based methods for prognostic stratification of survival data.

Authors:  M Radespiel-Tröger; T Rabenstein; H T Schneider; B Lausen
Journal:  Artif Intell Med       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 5.326

3.  Radiomics: a new application from established techniques.

Authors:  Vishwa Parekh; Michael A Jacobs
Journal:  Expert Rev Precis Med Drug Dev       Date:  2016-03-31

Review 4.  Characterization of PET/CT images using texture analysis: the past, the present… any future?

Authors:  Mathieu Hatt; Florent Tixier; Larry Pierce; Paul E Kinahan; Catherine Cheze Le Rest; Dimitris Visvikis
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2016-06-06       Impact factor: 9.236

5.  Molecular imaging biomarkers of resistance to radiation therapy for spontaneous nasal tumors in canines.

Authors:  Tyler J Bradshaw; Stephen R Bowen; Michael A Deveau; Lyndsay Kubicek; Pamela White; Søren M Bentzen; Richard J Chappell; Lisa J Forrest; Robert Jeraj
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2015-03-15       Impact factor: 7.038

6.  Variability of textural features in FDG PET images due to different acquisition modes and reconstruction parameters.

Authors:  Paulina E Galavis; Christian Hollensen; Ngoneh Jallow; Bhudatt Paliwal; Robert Jeraj
Journal:  Acta Oncol       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 4.089

Review 7.  Methods and challenges in quantitative imaging biomarker development.

Authors:  Richard G Abramson; Kirsteen R Burton; John-Paul J Yu; Ernest M Scalzetti; Thomas E Yankeelov; Andrew B Rosenkrantz; Mishal Mendiratta-Lala; Brian J Bartholmai; Dhakshinamoorthy Ganeshan; Leon Lenchik; Rathan M Subramaniam
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 3.173

8.  Machine Learning methods for Quantitative Radiomic Biomarkers.

Authors:  Chintan Parmar; Patrick Grossmann; Johan Bussink; Philippe Lambin; Hugo J W L Aerts
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2015-08-17       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  Radiomics: Images Are More than Pictures, They Are Data.

Authors:  Robert J Gillies; Paul E Kinahan; Hedvig Hricak
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2015-11-18       Impact factor: 11.105

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.