Literature DB >> 33336305

Comparative effects of flow vs. volume-controlled one-lung ventilation on gas exchange and respiratory system mechanics in pigs.

Jakob Wittenstein1, Martin Scharffenberg1, Xi Ran1, Diana Keller1, Pia Michler1, Sebastian Tauer1, Raphael Theilen1, Thomas Kiss1, Thomas Bluth1, Thea Koch1, Marcelo Gama de Abreu2, Robert Huhle1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Flow-controlled ventilation (FCV) allows expiratory flow control, reducing the collapse of the airways during expiration. The performance of FCV during one-lung ventilation (OLV) under intravascular normo- and hypovolaemia is currently unknown. In this explorative study, we hypothesised that OLV with FCV improves PaO2 and reduces mechanical power compared to volume-controlled ventilation (VCV). Sixteen juvenile pigs were randomly assigned to one of two groups: (1) intravascular normovolaemia (n = 8) and (2) intravascular hypovolaemia (n = 8). To mimic inflammation due to major thoracic surgery, a thoracotomy was performed, and 0.5 μg/kg/h lipopolysaccharides from Escherichia coli continuously administered intravenously. Animals were randomly assigned to OLV with one of two sequences (60 min per mode): (1) VCV-FCV or (2) FCV-VCV. Variables of gas exchange, haemodynamics and respiratory signals were collected 20, 40 and 60 min after initiation of OLV with each mechanical ventilation mode. The distribution of ventilation was determined using electrical impedance tomography (EIT).
RESULTS: Oxygenation did not differ significantly between modes (P = 0.881). In the normovolaemia group, the corrected expired minute volume (P = 0.022) and positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) were lower during FCV than VCV. The minute volume (P ≤ 0.001), respiratory rate (P ≤ 0.001), total PEEP (P ≤ 0.001), resistance of the respiratory system (P ≤ 0.001), mechanical power (P ≤ 0.001) and resistive mechanical power (P ≤ 0.001) were lower during FCV than VCV irrespective of the volaemia status. The distribution of ventilation did not differ between both ventilation modes (P = 0.103).
CONCLUSIONS: In a model of OLV in normo- and hypovolemic pigs, mechanical power was lower during FCV compared to VCV, without significant differences in oxygenation. Furthermore, the efficacy of ventilation was higher during FCV compared to VCV during normovolaemia.

Entities:  

Keywords:  FCV; Hypoxemia; Intravascular hypovolaemia; Mechanical power; Normovolaemia; OLV; Resistive mechanical power; Thoracic surgery; VILI

Year:  2020        PMID: 33336305     DOI: 10.1186/s40635-020-00308-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Intensive Care Med Exp        ISSN: 2197-425X


  2 in total

1.  Comparison of the cardiopulmonary responses to single bolus and continuous infusion of endotoxin in an ovine model.

Authors:  D L Traber; J T Flynn; D N Herndon; H Redl; G Schlag; L D Traber
Journal:  Circ Shock       Date:  1989-02

2.  Normal physiological values for conscious pigs used in biomedical research.

Authors:  J P Hannon; C A Bossone; C E Wade
Journal:  Lab Anim Sci       Date:  1990-05
  2 in total
  2 in total

1.  Flow-controlled ventilation may reduce mechanical power and increase ventilatory efficiency in severe coronavirus disease-19 acute respiratory distress syndrome.

Authors:  A Grassetto; T Pettenuzzo; F Badii; R Carlon; N Sella; P Navalesi
Journal:  Pulmonology       Date:  2022-06-10

2.  Flow-controlled ventilation maintains gas exchange and lung aeration in a pediatric model of healthy and injured lungs: A randomized cross-over experimental study.

Authors:  Álmos Schranc; Ádám L Balogh; John Diaper; Roberta Südy; Ferenc Peták; Walid Habre; Gergely Albu
Journal:  Front Pediatr       Date:  2022-09-09       Impact factor: 3.569

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.