| Literature DB >> 33335889 |
Cristina Belda Marín1,2, Vincent Fitzpatrick3, David L Kaplan3, Jessem Landoulsi2, Erwann Guénin1, Christophe Egles4.
Abstract
Silk fibroin (SF) is a natural protein largely used in the textile industry but also in biomedicine, catalysis, and other materials applications. SF is biocompatible, biodegradable, and possesses high tensile strength. Moreover, it is a versatile compound that can be formed into different materials at the macro, micro- and nano-scales, such as nanofibers, nanoparticles, hydrogels, microspheres, and other formats. Silk can be further integrated into emerging and promising additive manufacturing techniques like bioprinting, stereolithography or digital light processing 3D printing. As such, the development of methodologies for the functionalization of silk materials provide added value. Inorganic nanoparticles (INPs) have interesting and unexpected properties differing from bulk materials. These properties include better catalysis efficiency (better surface/volume ratio and consequently decreased quantify of catalyst), antibacterial activity, fluorescence properties, and UV-radiation protection or superparamagnetic behavior depending on the metal used. Given the promising results and performance of INPs, their use in many different procedures has been growing. Therefore, combining the useful properties of silk fibroin materials with those from INPs is increasingly relevant in many applications. Two main methodologies have been used in the literature to form silk-based bionanocomposites: in situ synthesis of INPs in silk materials, or the addition of preformed INPs to silk materials. This work presents an overview of current silk nanocomposites developed by these two main methodologies. An evaluation of overall INP characteristics and their distribution within the material is presented for each approach. Finally, an outlook is provided about the potential applications of these resultant nanocomposite materials.Entities:
Keywords: bioactive biomaterials; nanoparticles; natural polymers; regenerative medicine; silk
Year: 2020 PMID: 33335889 PMCID: PMC7736416 DOI: 10.3389/fchem.2020.604398
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Chem ISSN: 2296-2646 Impact factor: 5.221
Figure 1Overview of the various biomaterials obtained from of silk fibroin extracted from silk cocoons (A). Silk cocoons (A), sponges (B), macroscopic and microscopic images of electrospun mats (C,E), 3D printed structures (D), films (F), hydrogels (G), and aerogels (H).
Applications, NPs, functionalization method, and silk materials for silk-based bionanocomposites.
| Antibacterial | Ag | Degummed fibers | Lu et al., | |
| Electrospun | Calamak et al., | |||
| Film | Yu et al., | |||
| Silk dispersion | Jia et al., | |||
| Sutures | Baygar et al., | |||
| Textile | Zhang et al., | |||
| Degummed fibers | Dhas et al., | |||
| Upstream | Electrospun | Uttayarat et al., | ||
| Fibers | Karthikeyan et al., | |||
| Textile | Gulrajani et al., | |||
| CuO | Yarn | Abbasi et al., | ||
| SeO | Electrospun | Chung et al., | ||
| ZnO | Upstream | Film | Patil et al., | |
| Antibacterial/catalysis/dyeing | Pt | Textile | Zou et al., | |
| Antibacterial/photocatalysis | Ag/AgCl | Porous films | Zhou et al., | |
| Antibacterial/tissue engineering | Ag Au HAP | Sponge | Ribeiro et al., | |
| Ag | Hu et al., | |||
| Antibacterial/wound healing | Ag | Gel | Patil et al., | |
| Antibacterial/UV protection | Au | Textile | Tang et al., | |
| CeO2 | Upstream | Degummed fibers | Lu et al., | |
| Antibacterial tissue protection | Ag | Upstream | Textile | Zhou and Tang, |
| Antibiotic dose reduction | Au | Textile | Zhou et al., | |
| Catalysis | Au | Sponge | Das and Dhar, | |
| Fe3O4 | Hydrogel | Luo and Shao, | ||
| Pd | Degummed fibers | Ikawa et al., | ||
| Depollution | CuO | Silk dispersion | Kim et al., | |
| Fe2O3 | Upstream | Cocoons | Liu et al., | |
| TiO2 | Upstream | Electrospun | Aziz et al., | |
| Hyperthermia | Au | Upstream | Hydrogel | Kojic et al., |
| Nanofibers | Wang J. et al., | |||
| Fe3O4 | Hydrogel | Qian et al., | ||
| Imaging | NaYF4@SiO2 | Worm feeding | Cocoons | Deng et al., |
| C nanodots | Fan et al., | |||
| Au | Film | Yin et al., | ||
| Silk dispersion | Ranjana et al., | |||
| C nanotubes/Au | Upstream | hydrogel | Zhang et al., | |
| CdS | Fibers | Han et al., | ||
| CdTe | Upstream | Film | Sohail Haroone et al., | |
| GO | Silk GO paper | Ma and Tsukruk, | ||
| Graphene | Film | Wang et al., | ||
| Ni nanodisc | Textile | Schmucker et al., | ||
| Sensing SERS | Au | Silk textile | Liu et al., | |
| Upstream | Film | Guo et al., | ||
| Tissue engineering | Au | Upstream | Electrospun | Cohen-karni et al., |
| Bioactive glass | 3D printed | Midha et al., | ||
| Sponge | Bidgoli et al., | |||
| CoFe2O4/Fe3O4 | Electrospun | Brito-Pereira et al., | ||
| Cu bioactive glass | Hydrogel | Wu et al., | ||
| Fe3O4 | Sponge | Aliramaji et al., | ||
| GO | Hydrogel | Wang et al., | ||
| HAP | 3D printed | Huang et al., | ||
| Compacted powder | Zakharov et al., | |||
| Silk dispersion | Kong et al., | |||
| Upstream | 3D printed | Sun et al., | ||
| Fibers | Heimbach et al., | |||
| Hydrogel | Ding et al., | |||
| Sponge | Kweon et al., | |||
| HAP TiO2 | Upstream | Sponge | Kim et al., | |
| Silica | Film | Mieszawska et al., | ||
| Wearable electronics | Au | Upstream | Film | Tao et al., |
Figure 2Examples of silk bionanocomposites. Scanning Electron Microscopy view of electrospun silk fibers (A) with gold nanoparticles (Au NPs) (B), iron oxide nanoparticles (IONPs) (C) or silver nanoparticles (Ag NPs) [(E–G), STEM-EDS with elemental mapping]. Macroscopic view of electrospun scaffolds (D) and sponges (H) with gold (Au NPs) and iron oxide nanoparticles (IONPs).