Literature DB >> 33334498

Two discrete choice experiments on laboratory safety decisions and practices.

Oliver Wirth1, Anne M Foreman2, Jonathan E Friedel2, Michael E Andrew2.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: The path toward enhancing laboratory safety requires a thorough understanding of the factors that influence the safety-related decision making of laboratory personnel.
METHOD: We developed and administered a web-based survey to assess safety-related decision making of laboratory personnel of a government research organization. The survey included two brief discrete choice experiments (DCEs) that allowed for quantitative analysis of specific factors that potentially influence safety-related decisions and practices associated with two different hypothetical laboratory safety scenarios. One scenario related to reporting a laboratory spill, and the other scenario involved changing protective gloves between laboratory rooms. The survey also included several brief self-report measures of attitude, perception, and behavior related to safety practices.
RESULTS: Risk perception was the most influential factor in safety-related decision making in both scenarios. Potential negative consequences and effort associated with reporting an incident and the likelihood an incident was detected by others also affected reporting likelihood. Wearing gloves was also affected somewhat by perceived exposure risk, but not by other social or work-related factors included in the scenarios.
CONCLUSIONS: The study demonstrated the promise of DCEs in quantifying the relative impact of several factors on safety-related choices of laboratory workers in two hypothetical but realistic scenarios. Participants were faced with hypothetical choice scenarios with realistic features instead of traditional scaling techniques that ask about attitudes and perceptions. The methods are suitable for addressing many occupational safety concerns in which workers face tradeoffs in their safety-related decisions and behavior. Practical Application: Safety-related decisions regarding laboratory practices such as incident reporting and use of PPE were influenced primarily by workers' perceptions of risk of exposure and severity of risks to health and safety. This finding suggests the importance of providing laboratory workers with adequate and effective education and training on the hazards and risks associated with their work. DCEs are a promising research method for better understanding the relative influences of various personal, social, and organizational factors that shape laboratory safety decisions and practices. The information gained from DCEs may lead to more targeted training materials and interventions.
Copyright © 2020.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Decision-making; Discrete choice experiment; Laboratory safety

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 33334498      PMCID: PMC7755112          DOI: 10.1016/j.jsr.2020.08.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Safety Res        ISSN: 0022-4375


  30 in total

1.  Compliance with personal precautions against exposure to bloodborne pathogens among laboratory workers: a Canadian survey .

Authors:  Cheryl L Main; Soo Chan Carusone; Kurt Davis; Mark Loeb
Journal:  Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 3.254

Review 2.  Determinants of implementation of primary preventive interventions on patient handling in healthcare: a systematic review.

Authors:  E Koppelaar; J J Knibbe; H S Miedema; A Burdorf
Journal:  Occup Environ Med       Date:  2009-02-18       Impact factor: 4.402

3.  Conjoint analysis applications in health--a checklist: a report of the ISPOR Good Research Practices for Conjoint Analysis Task Force.

Authors:  John F P Bridges; A Brett Hauber; Deborah Marshall; Andrew Lloyd; Lisa A Prosser; Dean A Regier; F Reed Johnson; Josephine Mauskopf
Journal:  Value Health       Date:  2011-04-22       Impact factor: 5.725

4.  Eliciting benefit-risk preferences and probability-weighted utility using choice-format conjoint analysis.

Authors:  George Van Houtven; F Reed Johnson; Vikram Kilambi; A Brett Hauber
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  2011-02-10       Impact factor: 2.583

5.  Safety, incentives, and the reporting of work-related injuries among union carpenters: "you're pretty much screwed if you get hurt at work".

Authors:  Hester J Lipscomb; James Nolan; Dennis Patterson; Vince Sticca; Douglas J Myers
Journal:  Am J Ind Med       Date:  2012-10-25       Impact factor: 2.214

6.  The influence of risk perception on biosafety level-2 laboratory workers' hand-to-face contact behaviors.

Authors:  James D Johnston; Dennis Eggett; Michele J Johnson; James C Reading
Journal:  J Occup Environ Hyg       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 2.155

7.  Statistical Methods for the Analysis of Discrete Choice Experiments: A Report of the ISPOR Conjoint Analysis Good Research Practices Task Force.

Authors:  A Brett Hauber; Juan Marcos González; Catharina G M Groothuis-Oudshoorn; Thomas Prior; Deborah A Marshall; Charles Cunningham; Maarten J IJzerman; John F P Bridges
Journal:  Value Health       Date:  2016-05-12       Impact factor: 5.725

8.  Constructing experimental designs for discrete-choice experiments: report of the ISPOR Conjoint Analysis Experimental Design Good Research Practices Task Force.

Authors:  F Reed Johnson; Emily Lancsar; Deborah Marshall; Vikram Kilambi; Axel Mühlbacher; Dean A Regier; Brian W Bresnahan; Barbara Kanninen; John F P Bridges
Journal:  Value Health       Date:  2013 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 5.725

9.  Several methods to investigate relative attribute impact in stated preference experiments.

Authors:  Emily Lancsar; Jordan Louviere; Terry Flynn
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2007-01-25       Impact factor: 4.634

10.  Fall hazard control observed on residential construction sites.

Authors:  Vicki Kaskutas; Ann Marie Dale; James Nolan; Dennis Patterson; Hester J Lipscomb; Bradley Evanoff
Journal:  Am J Ind Med       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 3.079

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.