Literature DB >> 33334319

Inter-protein residue covariation information unravels physically interacting protein dimers.

Sara Salmanian1, Hamid Pezeshk2,3,4, Mehdi Sadeghi5.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Predicting physical interaction between proteins is one of the greatest challenges in computational biology. There are considerable various protein interactions and a huge number of protein sequences and synthetic peptides with unknown interacting counterparts. Most of co-evolutionary methods discover a combination of physical interplays and functional associations. However, there are only a handful of approaches which specifically infer physical interactions. Hybrid co-evolutionary methods exploit inter-protein residue coevolution to unravel specific physical interacting proteins. In this study, we introduce a hybrid co-evolutionary-based approach to predict physical interplays between pairs of protein families, starting from protein sequences only.
RESULTS: In the present analysis, pairs of multiple sequence alignments are constructed for each dimer and the covariation between residues in those pairs are calculated by CCMpred (Contacts from Correlated Mutations predicted) and three mutual information based approaches for ten accessible surface area threshold groups. Then, whole residue couplings between proteins of each dimer are unified into a single Frobenius norm value. Norms of residue contact matrices of all dimers in different accessible surface area thresholds are fed into support vector machine as single or multiple feature models. The results of training the classifiers by single features show no apparent different accuracies in distinct methods for different accessible surface area thresholds. Nevertheless, mutual information product and context likelihood of relatedness procedures may roughly have an overall higher and lower performances than other two methods for different accessible surface area cut-offs, respectively. The results also demonstrate that training support vector machine with multiple norm features for several accessible surface area thresholds leads to a considerable improvement of prediction performance. In this context, CCMpred roughly achieves an overall better performance than mutual information based approaches. The best accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, precision and negative predictive value for that method are 0.98, 1, 0.962, 0.96, and 0.962, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: In this paper, by feeding norm values of protein dimers into support vector machines in different accessible surface area thresholds, we demonstrate that even small number of proteins in pairs of multiple alignments could allow one to accurately discriminate between positive and negative dimers.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Coevolution; Mutual information; Physical interaction; Protein–protein interaction; Sequence-based prediction; Surface accessibility

Year:  2020        PMID: 33334319     DOI: 10.1186/s12859-020-03930-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics        ISSN: 1471-2105            Impact factor:   3.169


  46 in total

1.  Co-evolution of proteins with their interaction partners.

Authors:  C S Goh; A A Bogan; M Joachimiak; D Walther; F E Cohen
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2000-06-02       Impact factor: 5.469

2.  Similarity of phylogenetic trees as indicator of protein-protein interaction.

Authors:  F Pazos; A Valencia
Journal:  Protein Eng       Date:  2001-09

3.  Co-evolutionary analysis reveals insights into protein-protein interactions.

Authors:  Chern-Sing Goh; Fred E Cohen
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2002-11-15       Impact factor: 5.469

Review 4.  Computational methods for protein-protein interaction and their application.

Authors:  Tie-Liu Shi; Yi-Xue Li; Yu-Dong Cai; Kuo-Chen Chou
Journal:  Curr Protein Pept Sci       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 3.272

Review 5.  Prediction of physical protein-protein interactions.

Authors:  András Szilágyi; Vera Grimm; Adrián K Arakaki; Jeffrey Skolnick
Journal:  Phys Biol       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 2.583

Review 6.  Emerging methods in protein co-evolution.

Authors:  David de Juan; Florencio Pazos; Alfonso Valencia
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2013-03-05       Impact factor: 53.242

7.  Assessing protein co-evolution in the context of the tree of life assists in the prediction of the interactome.

Authors:  Florencio Pazos; Juan A G Ranea; David Juan; Michael J E Sternberg
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2005-09-30       Impact factor: 5.469

8.  TSEMA: interactive prediction of protein pairings between interacting families.

Authors:  José M G Izarzugaza; David Juan; Carles Pons; Juan A G Ranea; Alfonso Valencia; Florencio Pazos
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2006-07-01       Impact factor: 16.971

9.  Evaluation of physical and functional protein-protein interaction prediction methods for detecting biological pathways.

Authors:  Vijaykumar Yogesh Muley; Akash Ranjan
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-01-17       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 10.  Protein-protein interaction networks: probing disease mechanisms using model systems.

Authors:  Uros Kuzmanov; Andrew Emili
Journal:  Genome Med       Date:  2013-04-30       Impact factor: 11.117

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.