Literature DB >> 33333940

In Vivo Comparative Evaluation of Biocompatibility and Biodegradation of Bovine and Porcine Collagen Membranes.

Abdu Mansur Dacache Neto1, Suelen Cristina Sartoretto2,3,4, Isabelle Martins Duarte5, Rodrigo Figueiredo de Brito Resende3,6, Adriana Terezinha Neves Novellino Alves7, Carlos Fernando de Almeida Barros Mourão8, Jose Calasans-Maia9, Pietro Montemezzi10, Gilson Coutinho Tristão11, Mônica Diuana Calasans-Maia4,6.   

Abstract

Mechanical barriers prevent the invasion of the surrounding soft tissues within the bone defects. This concept is known as Guided Bone Regeneration (GBR). The knowledge about the local tissue reaction and the time of degradation of absorbable membranes favors the correct clinical indication. This study aimed to evaluate the biocompatibility and biodegradation of a bovine collagen membrane (Lyostypt®, São Gonçalo, Brazil) and compare it to a porcine collagen membrane (Bio-Gide®) implanted in the subcutaneous tissue of mice, following ISO 10993-6:2016. Thirty Balb-C mice were randomly divided into three experimental groups, LT (Lyostypt®), BG (Bio-Gide®), and Sham (without implantation), and subdivided according to the experimental periods (7, 21, and 63 days). The BG was considered non-irritant at seven days and slight and moderate irritant at 21 and 63 days, respectively. The LT presented a small irritant reaction at seven days, a mild reaction after 21, and a reduction in the inflammatory response at 63 days. The biodegradation of the LT occurred more rapidly compared to the BG after 63 days. This study concluded that both membranes were considered biocompatible since their tissue reactions were compatible with the physiological inflammatory process; however, the Bio-Gide® was less degraded during the experimental periods, favoring the guided bone regeneration process.

Entities:  

Keywords:  biocompatibility; biodegradation; collagen membrane; guided bone regeneration; mice; subcutaneous

Year:  2020        PMID: 33333940     DOI: 10.3390/membranes10120423

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Membranes (Basel)        ISSN: 2077-0375


  5 in total

Review 1.  Barrier Membrane in Regenerative Therapy: A Narrative Review.

Authors:  Muhammad Syafiq Alauddin; Nur Ayman Abdul Hayei; Muhammad Annurdin Sabarudin; Nor Haliza Mat Baharin
Journal:  Membranes (Basel)       Date:  2022-04-20

2.  Calvaria Critical Size Defects Regeneration Using Collagen Membranes to Assess the Osteopromotive Principle: An Animal Study.

Authors:  Vinícius Ferreira Bizelli; Edith Umasi Ramos; Allice Santos Cruz Veras; Giovana Rampazzo Teixeira; Leonardo P Faverani; Ana Paula Farnezi Bassi
Journal:  Membranes (Basel)       Date:  2022-04-24

3.  In Vivo Evaluation of Permeable and Impermeable Membranes for Guided Bone Regeneration.

Authors:  Suelen Cristina Sartoretto; Natalia de Freitas Gens; Rodrigo Figueiredo de Brito Resende; Adriana Terezinha Neves Novellino Alves; Rafael Cury Cecato; Marcelo José Uzeda; Jose Mauro Granjeiro; Monica Diuana Calasans-Maia; Jose Albuquerque Calasans-Maia
Journal:  Membranes (Basel)       Date:  2022-07-15

Review 4.  Recent advances in biofunctional guided bone regeneration materials for repairing defective alveolar and maxillofacial bone: A review.

Authors:  Bing Wang; Chengmin Feng; Yiming Liu; Fanglin Mi; Jun Dong
Journal:  Jpn Dent Sci Rev       Date:  2022-08-27

5.  CGF-HLC-I repaired the bone defect repair of the rabbits mandible through tight junction pathway.

Authors:  Yalin Mao; Miaoling Hu; Li Chen; Xiao Chen; Maohua Liu; Menglian Zhang; Minhai Nie; Xuqian Liu
Journal:  Front Bioeng Biotechnol       Date:  2022-09-20
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.