Klaus-Peter Dieckmann1, David Marghawal2, Uwe Pichlmeier3, Christian Wülfing2. 1. Asklepios Klinik Altona, Urologische Abteilung, Hamburg, Germany, DieckmannKP@t-online.de. 2. Asklepios Klinik Altona, Urologische Abteilung, Hamburg, Germany. 3. Institut für Medizinische Biometrie und Statistik, Universitätsklinikum Eppendorf, Hamburg, Zentrum für Experimentelle Medizin, Hamburg, Germany.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Thromboembolic events (TEEs) may significantly complicate the clinical management of patients with testicular germ cell tumours (GCTs). We analysed a cohort of GCT patients for the occurrence of TEEs and looked to possible pathogenetic factors. PATIENTS, METHODS: TEEs occurring within 6 months after diagnosis were retrospectively analysed in 317 consecutive patients with testicular GCT (median age 37 years, 198 seminoma, 119 nonseminoma). The following factors were analysed for association with TEE: histology, age, clinical stage (CS), chemotherapy, use of a central venous access device (CVA). Data analysis involved descriptive statistical methods with multivariable analysis to identify independent risk factors. RESULTS: Twenty-three TEEs (7.3%) were observed, 18 deep vein thromboses, 4 pulmonary embolisms, and 1 myocardial infarction. Univariable risk calculation yielded the following odds ratios (ORs) : >CS1 OR = 43.7 (95% confidence intervals [CIs] 9.9-191.6); chemotherapy OR = 7.8 (95% CI 2.3-26.6); CVA OR = 30.5 (95% CI 11.0-84.3). Multivariable analysis identified only CS > 1 (OR = 16.9; 95% CI 3.5-82.4) and CVA (OR = 9.0; 95% CI 2.9-27.5) as independent risk factors. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with CSs >CS1 are at significantly increased risk of TEEs even without chemotherapy. Particular high risk is associated with the use of CVA devices for chemotherapy. Caregivers of GCT patients must be aware of the particular risk of TEEs.
BACKGROUND:Thromboembolic events (TEEs) may significantly complicate the clinical management of patients with testicular germ cell tumours (GCTs). We analysed a cohort of GCT patients for the occurrence of TEEs and looked to possible pathogenetic factors. PATIENTS, METHODS: TEEs occurring within 6 months after diagnosis were retrospectively analysed in 317 consecutive patients with testicular GCT (median age 37 years, 198 seminoma, 119 nonseminoma). The following factors were analysed for association with TEE: histology, age, clinical stage (CS), chemotherapy, use of a central venous access device (CVA). Data analysis involved descriptive statistical methods with multivariable analysis to identify independent risk factors. RESULTS: Twenty-three TEEs (7.3%) were observed, 18 deep vein thromboses, 4 pulmonary embolisms, and 1 myocardial infarction. Univariable risk calculation yielded the following odds ratios (ORs) : >CS1 OR = 43.7 (95% confidence intervals [CIs] 9.9-191.6); chemotherapy OR = 7.8 (95% CI 2.3-26.6); CVA OR = 30.5 (95% CI 11.0-84.3). Multivariable analysis identified only CS > 1 (OR = 16.9; 95% CI 3.5-82.4) and CVA (OR = 9.0; 95% CI 2.9-27.5) as independent risk factors. CONCLUSIONS:Patients with CSs >CS1 are at significantly increased risk of TEEs even without chemotherapy. Particular high risk is associated with the use of CVA devices for chemotherapy. Caregivers of GCT patients must be aware of the particular risk of TEEs.