Literature DB >> 33333425

Sensitivity to temporal structure facilitates perceptual analysis of complex auditory scenes.

Lucie Aman1, Samantha Picken2, Lefkothea-Vasiliki Andreou3, Maria Chait4.   

Abstract

The notion that sensitivity to the statistical structure of the environment is pivotal to perception has recently garnered considerable attention. Here we investigated this issue in the context of hearing. Building on previous work (Sohoglu and Chait, 2016a; elife), stimuli were artificial 'soundscapes' populated by multiple (up to 14) simultaneous streams ('auditory objects') comprised of tone-pip sequences, each with a distinct frequency and pattern of amplitude modulation. Sequences were either temporally regular or random. We show that listeners' ability to detect abrupt appearance or disappearance of a stream is facilitated when scene streams were characterized by a temporally regular fluctuation pattern. The regularity of the changing stream as well as that of the background (non-changing) streams contribute independently to this effect. Remarkably, listeners benefit from regularity even when they are not consciously aware of it. These findings establish that perception of complex acoustic scenes relies on the availability of detailed representations of the regularities automatically extracted from multiple concurrent streams.
Copyright © 2020. Published by Elsevier B.V.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Auditory scene analysis; Change deafness; Change detection; Predictive coding; Temporal regularity; Time perception

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 33333425      PMCID: PMC7812374          DOI: 10.1016/j.heares.2020.108111

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hear Res        ISSN: 0378-5955            Impact factor:   3.208


  42 in total

Review 1.  Cortical oscillations and sensory predictions.

Authors:  Luc H Arnal; Anne-Lise Giraud
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2012-06-07       Impact factor: 20.229

Review 2.  Dissociating explicit timing from temporal expectation with fMRI.

Authors:  Jt Coull; Ac Nobre
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurobiol       Date:  2008-08-12       Impact factor: 6.627

3.  Auditory attention is divisible: segregated tone streams can be tracked simultaneously.

Authors:  Laurent Demany; Mayalen Erviti; Catherine Semal
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2015-03-09       Impact factor: 3.332

Review 4.  Great Expectations: Is there Evidence for Predictive Coding in Auditory Cortex?

Authors:  Micha Heilbron; Maria Chait
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2017-08-04       Impact factor: 3.590

5.  Sensitivity to complex statistical regularities in rat auditory cortex.

Authors:  Amit Yaron; Itai Hershenhoren; Israel Nelken
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2012-11-08       Impact factor: 17.173

6.  A corticostriatal neural system enhances auditory perception through temporal context processing.

Authors:  Eveline Geiser; Michael Notter; John D E Gabrieli
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2012-05-02       Impact factor: 6.167

7.  Temporal expectation improves the quality of sensory information.

Authors:  Gustavo Rohenkohl; André M Cravo; Valentin Wyart; Anna C Nobre
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2012-06-13       Impact factor: 6.167

8.  Attention, awareness, and the perception of auditory scenes.

Authors:  Joel S Snyder; Melissa K Gregg; David M Weintraub; Claude Alain
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2012-02-07

Review 9.  Predictability effects in auditory scene analysis: a review.

Authors:  Alexandra Bendixen
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2014-03-31       Impact factor: 4.677

10.  Attentional Enhancement of Auditory Mismatch Responses: a DCM/MEG Study.

Authors:  Ryszard Auksztulewicz; Karl Friston
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2015-01-16       Impact factor: 5.357

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.