Jenny K R Francis1, Jane A Andresen2, Alexis Guzman3, Jill D McLeigh4, Heidi M Kloster5, Susan L Rosenthal6. 1. Department of Pediatrics, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas; Children's Health, Dallas, Texas. Electronic address: jenny.francis@utsouthwestern.edu. 2. Department of Pediatrics, Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, New York. 3. Department of Pediatrics, Stanford Medicine, Stanford, California. 4. Children's Health, Dallas, Texas. 5. Department of Pediatrics, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, Wisconsin. 6. Department of Pediatrics, Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, New York; NewYork-Presbyterian Hospital, New York, New York; Department of Psychiatry, Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, New York.
Abstract
STUDY OBJECTIVE: In this study we evaluated published studies about foster care to: (1) determine the types of data used; (2) describe the degree to which a sexual/reproductive health topic was addressed; and (3) describe the consent process. DESIGN: Analysis of published literature. SETTING: PubMed was searched using "foster care" for English articles published between January 1, 2017 and September 4, 2019. PARTICIPANTS: None. INTERVENTIONS: None. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Articles were coded into 4 data source categories: primary, secondary, peripheral, or perspective data. Articles with a primary data source were coded for participant ages: only 9 years old and younger, 10- to 17-year-olds (minor adolescents), and only 18 years old and older. Articles using a secondary data source were coded for the source of the data registry. All articles were coded for presence of a sexual/reproductive health outcome. The primary data articles that included minor adolescents were coded for the study topic and consent process. RESULTS: Of the 176 articles about foster care, 72/176 (41%) used primary data, 53/176 (30%) used secondary data, and 51/176 (29%) used peripheral/perspective data. Forty-eight of the primary data articles included minor adolescents. Secondary data sources included few national research surveys. Sexual/reproductive health outcomes were measured in 17 articles, 4 of which used primary data. The consent process for minor adolescents varied and had no consistent pattern across studies. CONCLUSION: Research on best practices for consent processes and use of registries could be developed to increase research on sexual/reproductive health outcomes among adolescents in foster care.
STUDY OBJECTIVE: In this study we evaluated published studies about foster care to: (1) determine the types of data used; (2) describe the degree to which a sexual/reproductive health topic was addressed; and (3) describe the consent process. DESIGN: Analysis of published literature. SETTING: PubMed was searched using "foster care" for English articles published between January 1, 2017 and September 4, 2019. PARTICIPANTS: None. INTERVENTIONS: None. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Articles were coded into 4 data source categories: primary, secondary, peripheral, or perspective data. Articles with a primary data source were coded for participant ages: only 9 years old and younger, 10- to 17-year-olds (minor adolescents), and only 18 years old and older. Articles using a secondary data source were coded for the source of the data registry. All articles were coded for presence of a sexual/reproductive health outcome. The primary data articles that included minor adolescents were coded for the study topic and consent process. RESULTS: Of the 176 articles about foster care, 72/176 (41%) used primary data, 53/176 (30%) used secondary data, and 51/176 (29%) used peripheral/perspective data. Forty-eight of the primary data articles included minor adolescents. Secondary data sources included few national research surveys. Sexual/reproductive health outcomes were measured in 17 articles, 4 of which used primary data. The consent process for minor adolescents varied and had no consistent pattern across studies. CONCLUSION: Research on best practices for consent processes and use of registries could be developed to increase research on sexual/reproductive health outcomes among adolescents in foster care.
Authors: Mary V Greiner; Sarah J Beal; Katie Nause; Mary Allen Staat; Judith W Dexheimer; Philip V Scribano Journal: Pediatrics Date: 2017-11-15 Impact factor: 7.124
Authors: Amelia S Knopf; Mary A Ott; Nancy Liu; Bill G Kapogiannis; Gregory D Zimet; J Dennis Fortenberry; Sybil G Hosek Journal: J Adolesc Health Date: 2017-09-28 Impact factor: 5.012