Ahmed Babiker1, Xiaobai Li2, Yi Ling Lai3, Jeffrey R Strich4, Sarah Warner4, Sadia Sarzynski4, John P Dekker5, Robert L Danner4, Sameer S Kadri6. 1. Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA. 2. Department of Biostatistics, National Institutes of Health Clinical Center, Bethesda, MD, USA. 3. Epidemiology Unit, Laboratory of Clinical Immunology and Microbiology, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA. 4. Clinical Epidemiology Section, Critical Care Medicine Department, National Institutes of Health Clinical Center, Bethesda, MD, USA. 5. Bacterial Pathogenesis and Antimicrobial Resistance Unit, Laboratory of Clinical Immunology and Microbiology, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA. 6. Clinical Epidemiology Section, Critical Care Medicine Department, National Institutes of Health Clinical Center, Bethesda, MD, USA; Department of Medicine, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, MD, USA. Electronic address: sameer.kadri@nih.gov.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Clindamycin is strongly recommended as an adjunctive treatment to β-lactam antibiotics in patients with severe invasive group A β-haemolytic streptococcal (iGAS) infections. However, there is little evidence of a benefit in the use of clindamycin in humans, and its role, if any, in treating patients with invasive non-group A/B β-haemolytic streptococcal (iNABS) infections is unclear. METHODS: For this retrospective multicentre cohort study, we used a dataset from patients in the Cerner Health Facts database, which contains electronic health-based data from 233 US hospitals. We queried the Cerner Health Facts database for inpatients (no age restriction) admitted to hospital in 2000-15, with any clinical cultures positive for β-haemolytic streptococcal taxa of interest, and who had received β-lactam antibiotics within 3 days either side of culture sampling. This group of patients was then queried for those who had also received intravenous or oral clindamycin within 3 days either side of culture sampling. Patients were excluded if they had polymicrobial growth or clindamycin non-susceptible isolates, received linezolid, or had missing variable data needed for analysis. Patients were categorised by Lancefield group (iGAS or iNABS); β-lactam antibiotic-treated patients who had received clindamycin were propensity-matched (1:2) to those who did not receive clindamycin separately for iGAS and iNABS cohorts, and logistic regression was then used to account for residual confounding factors. The primary outcome was the adjusted odds ratio (aOR) of in-hospital mortality in propensity-matched patients treated with adjunctive clindamycin versus those not treated with clindamycin in the iGAS and iNABS infection cohorts. FINDINGS: We identified 1956 inpatients with invasive β-haemolytic streptococcal infection who had been treated with β-lactam antibiotics across 118 hospitals (1079 with iGAS infections and 877 with iNABS infections). 459 (23·4%) of these patients had received adjunctive clindamycin treatment (343 [31·7%] patients with iGAS infections and 116 [13·2%] patients with iNABS infections). The effect of adjunctive clindamycin therapy on in-hospital mortality differed significantly and showed the opposite trend in iGAS and iNABS infection cohorts (p=0·013 for an interaction). In the iGAS cohort, in-hospital mortality in propensity-matched patients who received adjunctive clindamycin (18 [6·5%] of 277 patients) was significantly lower than in those who did not (55 [11·0%] of 500 patients; aOR 0·44 [95% CI 0·23-0·81]). This survival benefit was maintained even in patients without shock or necrotising fasciitis (six [2·6%] of 239 patients treated with adjunctive clindamycin vs 27 [6·1%] of 422 patients not treated with adjunctive clindamycin; aOR 0·40 [0·15-0·91]). By contrast, in the iNABS infection cohort, in-hospital mortality in propensity-matched patients who received adjunctive clindamycin (ten [9·8%] of 102) was higher than in those who did not (nine [4·6%] of 193), but this difference was not significant (aOR 2·60 [0·94-7·52]). Several subset analyses found qualitatively similar results. INTERPRETATION: Real-world data suggest that increased use of adjunctive clindamycin for invasive iGAS infections, but not iNABS infections, could improve outcomes, even in patients without shock or necrotising fasciitis. FUNDING: Intramural Research Program of the National Institutes of Health Clinical Center and the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Disease.
BACKGROUND: Clindamycin is strongly recommended as an adjunctive treatment to β-lactam antibiotics in patients with severe invasive group A β-haemolytic streptococcal (iGAS) infections. However, there is little evidence of a benefit in the use of clindamycin in humans, and its role, if any, in treating patients with invasive non-group A/B β-haemolytic streptococcal (iNABS) infections is unclear. METHODS: For this retrospective multicentre cohort study, we used a dataset from patients in the Cerner Health Facts database, which contains electronic health-based data from 233 US hospitals. We queried the Cerner Health Facts database for inpatients (no age restriction) admitted to hospital in 2000-15, with any clinical cultures positive for β-haemolytic streptococcal taxa of interest, and who had received β-lactam antibiotics within 3 days either side of culture sampling. This group of patients was then queried for those who had also received intravenous or oral clindamycin within 3 days either side of culture sampling. Patients were excluded if they had polymicrobial growth or clindamycin non-susceptible isolates, received linezolid, or had missing variable data needed for analysis. Patients were categorised by Lancefield group (iGAS or iNABS); β-lactam antibiotic-treated patients who had received clindamycin were propensity-matched (1:2) to those who did not receive clindamycin separately for iGAS and iNABS cohorts, and logistic regression was then used to account for residual confounding factors. The primary outcome was the adjusted odds ratio (aOR) of in-hospital mortality in propensity-matched patients treated with adjunctive clindamycin versus those not treated with clindamycin in the iGAS and iNABS infection cohorts. FINDINGS: We identified 1956 inpatients with invasive β-haemolytic streptococcal infection who had been treated with β-lactam antibiotics across 118 hospitals (1079 with iGAS infections and 877 with iNABS infections). 459 (23·4%) of these patients had received adjunctive clindamycin treatment (343 [31·7%] patients with iGAS infections and 116 [13·2%] patients with iNABS infections). The effect of adjunctive clindamycin therapy on in-hospital mortality differed significantly and showed the opposite trend in iGAS and iNABS infection cohorts (p=0·013 for an interaction). In the iGAS cohort, in-hospital mortality in propensity-matched patients who received adjunctive clindamycin (18 [6·5%] of 277 patients) was significantly lower than in those who did not (55 [11·0%] of 500 patients; aOR 0·44 [95% CI 0·23-0·81]). This survival benefit was maintained even in patients without shock or necrotising fasciitis (six [2·6%] of 239 patients treated with adjunctive clindamycin vs 27 [6·1%] of 422 patients not treated with adjunctive clindamycin; aOR 0·40 [0·15-0·91]). By contrast, in the iNABS infection cohort, in-hospital mortality in propensity-matched patients who received adjunctive clindamycin (ten [9·8%] of 102) was higher than in those who did not (nine [4·6%] of 193), but this difference was not significant (aOR 2·60 [0·94-7·52]). Several subset analyses found qualitatively similar results. INTERPRETATION: Real-world data suggest that increased use of adjunctive clindamycin for invasive iGAS infections, but not iNABS infections, could improve outcomes, even in patients without shock or necrotising fasciitis. FUNDING: Intramural Research Program of the National Institutes of Health Clinical Center and the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Disease.
Authors: Jonathan R Carapetis; Peter Jacoby; Kylie Carville; Seong-Jin Joel Ang; Nigel Curtis; Ross Andrews Journal: Clin Infect Dis Date: 2014-04-29 Impact factor: 9.079
Authors: Sangeeta Mehta; Allison McGeer; Donald E Low; David Hallett; Dennis J Bowman; Stacey L Grossman; Thomas E Stewart Journal: Chest Date: 2006-12 Impact factor: 9.410
Authors: Laura N Broyles; Chris Van Beneden; Bernard Beall; Richard Facklam; P Lynn Shewmaker; Paul Malpiedi; Pamala Daily; Arthur Reingold; Monica M Farley Journal: Clin Infect Dis Date: 2009-03-15 Impact factor: 9.079
Authors: Massimo Sartelli; Mark A Malangoni; Addison K May; Pierluigi Viale; Lillian S Kao; Fausto Catena; Luca Ansaloni; Ernest E Moore; Fred A Moore; Andrew B Peitzman; Raul Coimbra; Ari Leppaniemi; Yoram Kluger; Walter Biffl; Kaoru Koike; Massimo Girardis; Carlos A Ordonez; Mario Tavola; Miguel Cainzos; Salomone Di Saverio; Gustavo P Fraga; Igor Gerych; Michael D Kelly; Korhan Taviloglu; Imtiaz Wani; Sanjay Marwah; Miklosh Bala; Wagih Ghnnam; Nissar Shaikh; Osvaldo Chiara; Mario Paulo Faro; Gerson Alves Pereira; Carlos Augusto Gomes; Federico Coccolini; Cristian Tranà; Davide Corbella; Pietro Brambillasca; Yunfeng Cui; Helmut A Segovia Lohse; Vladimir Khokha; Kenneth Yy Kok; Suk-Kyung Hong; Kuo-Ching Yuan Journal: World J Emerg Surg Date: 2014-11-18 Impact factor: 5.469
Authors: Richard Brindle; O Martin Williams; Paul Davies; Tim Harris; Heather Jarman; Alastair D Hay; Peter Featherstone Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2017-03-17 Impact factor: 2.692
Authors: H Bergsten; L M Palma Medina; M Morgan; K Moll; D H Skutlaberg; S Skrede; T Wajima; M Svensson; A Norrby-Teglund Journal: Antimicrob Agents Chemother Date: 2021-09-07 Impact factor: 5.191