Literature DB >> 33331322

[Evaluation of the reproducibility of non-verbal facial expressions in normal persons using dynamic stereophotogrammetric system].

T C Qiu, X J Liu, Z L Xue, Z L Li.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To assess the reproducibility of non-verbal facial expressions (smile lips closed, smile lips open, lip purse, cheek puff) in normal persons using dynamic three-dimensional (3D) imaging and provide reference data for future research.
METHODS: In this study, 15 adults (7 males and 8 females) without facial asymmetry and facial nerve dysfunction were recruited. Each participant was seated upright in front of the 3D imaging system in natural head position. The whole face could be captured in all six cameras. The dynamic 3D system captured 60 3D images per second. Four facial expressions were included: smile lips closed, smile lips open, lip purse, and cheek puff. Before starting, we instructed the subjects to make facial expressions to develop muscle memory. During recording, each facial expression took about 3 to 4 seconds. At least 1 week later, the procedure was repeated. The rest position (T0) was considered as the base frame. The first quartile of expressions (T1), just after reaching the maximum state of expressions (T2), just before the end of maximum state of expressions (T3), the third quartile of expressions (T4), and the end of motion (T5) were selected as key frames. Using the stable part of face such as forehead, each key frame (T1-T5) of the different expressions was aligned on the corresponding frame at rest (T0). The root mean square (RMS) between each key frame and its corresponding frame at rest were calculated. The Wilcoxon signed ranks test was applied to assess statistical differences between the corresponding frames of the different facial expressions.
RESULTS: Facial expressions like smile lips closed, smile lips open, and cheek puff were reproducible. Lip purse was not reproducible. The statistically significant differences were found on the T2 frame of the repeated lip purse movement.
CONCLUSION: The dynamic 3D imaging can be used to evaluate the reproducibility of facial expressions. Compared with the qualitative analysis and two-dimensions analysis, dynamic 3D images can be able to more truly represent the facial expressions which make the research more reliable.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Facial expression; Reproducibility of results; Three-dimensional images

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 33331322      PMCID: PMC7745277     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban        ISSN: 1671-167X


  15 in total

1.  Inference of attitudes from nonverbal communication in two channels.

Authors:  A Mehrabian; S R Ferris
Journal:  J Consult Psychol       Date:  1967-06

2.  Three-dimensional assessment of functional change following Class 3 orthognathic correction--a preliminary report.

Authors:  Hashmat Popat; Stephen Richmond; David Marshall; Paul L Rosin
Journal:  J Craniomaxillofac Surg       Date:  2011-03-05       Impact factor: 2.078

3.  A comparison of three-dimensional and two-dimensional analyses of facial motion.

Authors:  M M Gross; C A Trotman; K S Moffatt
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 2.079

4.  The clinical application of three-dimensional motion capture (4D): a novel approach to quantify the dynamics of facial animations.

Authors:  S Shujaat; B S Khambay; X Ju; J C Devine; J D McMahon; C Wales; A F Ayoub
Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2014-02-28       Impact factor: 2.789

5.  Facial nerve grading system.

Authors:  J W House; D E Brackmann
Journal:  Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  1985-04       Impact factor: 3.497

6.  Evaluation of the Reproducibility of Nonverbal Facial Expressions Using a 3D Motion Capture System.

Authors:  Xiangyang Ju; Emer O'Leary; Matthew Peng; Thamer Al-Anezi; Ashraf Ayoub; Balvinder Khambay
Journal:  Cleft Palate Craniofac J       Date:  2014-12-22

7.  Sensitivity of a method for the analysis of facial mobility. I. Vector of displacement.

Authors:  C A Trotman; J J Faraway; K T Silvester; G M Greenlee; L E Johnston
Journal:  Cleft Palate Craniofac J       Date:  1998-03

8.  Simultaneous quantitation of facial movements: the maximal static response assay of facial nerve function.

Authors:  P C Johnson; H Brown; W M Kuzon; R Balliet; J L Garrison; J Campbell
Journal:  Ann Plast Surg       Date:  1994-02       Impact factor: 1.539

9.  Three-dimensional assessment of facial appearance following surgical repair of unilateral cleft lip and palate.

Authors:  Aileen Bell; Tsz-Wai Rachel Lo; Denise Brown; Adrian W Bowman; J Paul Siebert; David R Simmons; Declan T Millett; Ashraf F Ayoub
Journal:  Cleft Palate Craniofac J       Date:  2013-01-31

10.  A geometric morphometric approach to the analysis of lip shape during speech: development of a clinical outcome measure.

Authors:  Hashmat Popat; Stephen Richmond; Alexei I Zhurov; Paul L Rosin; David Marshall
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-02-25       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.