Ísis de Fátima Balderrama1,2, Matheus Völz Cardoso3, Vitor Toledo Stuani3, Rodrigo Cardoso Oliveira4, Adriana Arruda Matos4, Sebastião Luiz Aguiar Greghi3, Adriana Campos Passanezi Sant'Ana3. 1. Department of Diagnosis and Surgery, Araraquara School of Dentistry, Sao Paulo State University, Araraquara, Sao Paulo, Brazil. if.balderrama@unesp.br. 2. Department of Prosthodontics and Periodontics, Bauru School of Dentistry, University of Sao Paulo, Bauru, Sao Paulo, Brazil. if.balderrama@unesp.br. 3. Department of Prosthodontics and Periodontics, Bauru School of Dentistry, University of Sao Paulo, Bauru, Sao Paulo, Brazil. 4. Department of Biological Science, Bauru School of Dentistry, University of Sao Paulo, Bauru, Sao Paulo, Brazil.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To investigate the influence of implant surface decontaminated and uncontaminated on osteoblast-like cell adhesion and proliferation MATERIALS AND METHODS: Commercially available implants of different brands and surface characteristics were selected: Biomet 3i® Nanotite (NT) and Osseotite (OT), Straumann® SLActive (SLA), and Neodent® Acqua Drive (ACQ) and Neoporos Drive CM (CM). Physical and chemical properties of the implants were investigated by scanning electron microscopy (SEM), energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS), and wettability analysis (WETT). Implants were previously contaminated with Aggregatibacter actinomycetemcomitans strains; after that, samples were decontaminated by different chemical methods. Decontaminated (test group; n = 15/type of implant) and uncontaminated (control group; n = 5/type of implant) samples were analyzed according to the number of human osteoblastic osteosarcoma cells (Saos-2) adhered on the implant surface after 24 h and 72 h in SEM images. RESULTS: ACQ was found to be highly hydrophilic, and NT was the most hydrophobic implant. Increased variation of Saos-2 cell adhesion and proliferation were observed on all test and control groups. Controversially, at the proliferation analysis in 72 h, CM implant was the only implant that showed no significant difference between test and group (p = 0.2833; Tukey's multiple comparisons test). NT implants showed the greater value of cell proliferation when compared with all types of implant surface (p = 0.0002; Tukey's multiple comparisons test). CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest that decontaminated surfaces were able to impair the counting of osteoblast-like cell adhesion and proliferation.
PURPOSE: To investigate the influence of implant surface decontaminated and uncontaminated on osteoblast-like cell adhesion and proliferation MATERIALS AND METHODS: Commercially available implants of different brands and surface characteristics were selected: Biomet 3i® Nanotite (NT) and Osseotite (OT), Straumann® SLActive (SLA), and Neodent® Acqua Drive (ACQ) and Neoporos Drive CM (CM). Physical and chemical properties of the implants were investigated by scanning electron microscopy (SEM), energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS), and wettability analysis (WETT). Implants were previously contaminated with Aggregatibacter actinomycetemcomitans strains; after that, samples were decontaminated by different chemical methods. Decontaminated (test group; n = 15/type of implant) and uncontaminated (control group; n = 5/type of implant) samples were analyzed according to the number of humanosteoblastic osteosarcoma cells (Saos-2) adhered on the implant surface after 24 h and 72 h in SEM images. RESULTS:ACQ was found to be highly hydrophilic, and NT was the most hydrophobic implant. Increased variation of Saos-2 cell adhesion and proliferation were observed on all test and control groups. Controversially, at the proliferation analysis in 72 h, CM implant was the only implant that showed no significant difference between test and group (p = 0.2833; Tukey's multiple comparisons test). NT implants showed the greater value of cell proliferation when compared with all types of implant surface (p = 0.0002; Tukey's multiple comparisons test). CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest that decontaminated surfaces were able to impair the counting of osteoblast-like cell adhesion and proliferation.
Authors: D Buser; N Broggini; M Wieland; R K Schenk; A J Denzer; D L Cochran; B Hoffmann; A Lussi; S G Steinemann Journal: J Dent Res Date: 2004-07 Impact factor: 6.116
Authors: Luigi Canullo; David Peñarrocha-Oltra; Ugo Covani; Daniele Botticelli; Giovanni Serino; Miguel Penarrocha Journal: Clin Oral Implants Res Date: 2015-01-26 Impact factor: 5.977
Authors: A Al-Ahmad; M Wiedmann-Al-Ahmad; A Fackler; M Follo; E Hellwig; M Bächle; C Hannig; J-S Han; M Wolkewitz; R Kohal Journal: Arch Oral Biol Date: 2013-05-18 Impact factor: 2.633