| Literature DB >> 33330599 |
Qin He1,2, Tiande Zou1,2, Jun Chen1,2, Li Jian1,2, Jia He1,2, Yingying Xia1,2, Fei Xie1,2, Zirui Wang1,2, Jinming You1,2.
Abstract
Adequate maternal methyl-donor micronutrient (MET) intake is an important determinant of the organ development and metabolic renovation of offspring. The mechanism involved in skeletal myogenesis and the effect of MET supplementation during pregnancy on the maternal body remain unclear. Thus, this study aimed to investigate the potential effect of methyl donor micronutrients (MET) on skeletal muscle development and metabolism in offspring using pig models. Forty-three Duroc × Erhualian gilts were assigned to two dietary groups during gestation: control diet (CON) and CON diet supplemented with MET (folic acid, methionine, choline, vitamin B6, and vitamin B12). The results showed that maternal MET exposure during pregnancy significantly increased the concentrations of protein, triiodothyronine (T3), and thyroxine (T4) in colostrum and methyl metabolites, including S-adenosylmethionine (SAM), S-adenosyl-L-homocysteine (SAH), 5-methyl-tetrahydrofolate (5-MTHF), and betaine, in the maternal and offspring umbilical vein serum. A similar pattern was demonstrated in the body weight gain and myofiber diameters in offspring. In addition, maternal MET supplementation significantly increased the concentration of offspring serum insulin-like growth factor 1 (IGF-1), T3, and T4; upregulated the mRNA expression of IGF-1 and IGF-1 receptor (IGF-1r) and the phosphorylation level of protein kinases in offspring longissimus dorsi muscle; and upregulated the expression of myogenic genes and fast myosin heavy chain (fast MyHC) in offspring skeletal muscle. Supplementing sows with higher levels of MET during gestation may promote skeletal muscle differentiation and maturity and improve the skeletal muscle mass of the piglets.Entities:
Keywords: colostrum; muscle differentiation; myogenesis; offspring; pregnancy
Year: 2020 PMID: 33330599 PMCID: PMC7734050 DOI: 10.3389/fnut.2020.609022
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Nutr ISSN: 2296-861X
Ingredients and nutrient composition of diets for the pregnant sows.
| Corn | 55.00 | 55.00 |
| Soybean hull | 10.00 | 10.00 |
| Rice bran | 10.00 | 10.00 |
| Expanded soybean | 8.00 | 8.00 |
| Soybean meal | 13.00 | 13.00 |
| Dicalcium phosphate | 1.70 | 1.70 |
| Limestone | 0.20 | 0.20 |
| NaCl | 0.30 | 0.30 |
| Lysine monohydrochloride, 98.5% | 0.05 | 0.05 |
| Choline chloride, 60% | 0.17 | 0.17 |
| Minerals | 0.40 | 0.40 |
| Vitamins | 0.05 | 0.05 |
| Methyl donnor | 0 | 1.11 |
| Filler | 1.13 | 0.02 |
| Total | 100.00 | 100.00 |
| Digestible energy, Mcal kg−1 | 3.14 | 3.14 |
| Crude protein, % | 15.20 | 15.20 |
| Total lysine, % | 0.86 | 0.86 |
| Standardized ideal digestible- lysine, % | 0.72 | 0.72 |
| Calcium, % | 0.86 | 0.86 |
| Total phosphorus, % | 0.69 | 0.69 |
| Available phosphorus, % | 0.41 | 0.41 |
| Folic acid, mg kg−1 | 1.30 | 16.30 |
| Choline, mg kg−1 | 1025.00 | 2230.00 |
| Vitamin B12, μg kg−1 | 30.00 | 150.00 |
| Vitamin B6, mg kg−1 | 3.00 | 1180.00 |
| Methionine, mg kg−1 | 2050.00 | 4700.00 |
| Crude protein | 15.26 | 15.22 |
| Crude ash | 5.96 | 5.92 |
| Crude fat | 5.63 | 5.57 |
| Crude fiber | 5.23 | 5.38 |
| Calcium | 0.94 | 0.98 |
| Total phosphorus | 0.64 | 0.64 |
Vitamin mixture supplied the following amounts of vitamins/kg of complete diet: 10,000 IU vitamin A; 1,000 IU vitamin D3; 60 IU vitamin E; 2 mg vitamin B1; 4 mg vitamin B2; 3 mg niacin; 15 mg Cu; 110 mg Fe; 100 mg Zn; 20 mg Mn; 0.2 mg I; 0.3 mg Se.
Calculated according to the China Feed Database.
The filler was wheat middlings (CF = 2.8%, CP = 13.6%, DE = 3.1 Mcal/kg).
The nutrient composition is measured value.
Ingredients and nutrient composition of basal diets during lactation.
| Corn | 59.00 |
| Rice bran | 7.00 |
| Soybean meal | 22.00 |
| Fermented soybean meal | 4.00 |
| Soybean oil | 2.00 |
| Fish meal | 2.00 |
| Dicalcium phosphate | 1.40 |
| Limestone | 1.20 |
| NaCl | 0.30 |
| Lysine monohydrochloride, 98.5% | 0.05 |
| Choline chloride, 60% | 0.17 |
| Minerals | 0.20 |
| Vitamins | 0.20 |
| Filler | 0.48 |
| Total | 100.00 |
| Digestible energy, Mcal kg−1 | 3.30 |
| Crude protein, % | 18.46 |
| Total lysine, % | 1.05 |
| Standardized ideal digestible-lysine, % | 0.92 |
| Standardized ideal digestible-methionine, % | 0.27 |
| Standardized ideal digestible-threonine, % | 0.62 |
| Standardized ideal digestible-tryptophan, % | 0.20 |
| Calcium, % | 0.93 |
| Total phosphorus, % | 0.73 |
| Available phosphorus, % | 0.43 |
| Crude protein | 18.86 |
| Crude ash | 6.25 |
| Crude fat | 4.44 |
| Crude fiber | 4.05 |
| Calcium | 0.98 |
| Total phosphorus | 0.69 |
Vitamin mixture supplied the following amounts of vitamins/kg of complete diet: 7,000 IU vitamin A; 1500 IU vitamin D3; 16 IU vitamin E; 1 mg vitamin B1; 2.4 mg vitamin B2; 1 mg vitamin B6; 8 μg vitamin B12; 20 mg niacin; 0.6 mg folic acid; 16 mg Cu; 100 mg Fe; 80 mg Zn; 2 mg Mn; 0.14 mg I; 0.1 mg Se.
The filler was wheat middlings (CF = 2.8%, CP = 13.6%, DE = 3.1 Mcal/kg).
Calculated according to the China Feed Database.
The nutrient composition is measured value.
Primer sequences of the target genes and reference genes.
| IGF1 | Forward: TTCAACAAGCCCACAGGGTA | 102 | |
| Reverse: CTCCAGCCTCCTCAGATCAC | |||
| IGF-1r | Forward: ATTACCGCAAGGGAGGGAAA | 174 | |
| Reverse: GAAGGACTTGCTCGTTGGAC | |||
| AKT1 | Forward: CTGCCCTTCTACAACCAGGA | 66 | |
| Reverse: GAAGCGGATCTCCTCCATGA | |||
| AKT2 | Forward: GTGCTTCGTGATGGAGTACG | 118 | |
| Reverse:C TCCAGAGCCGAGACAATCT | |||
| IGFBP5 | Forward: GTGTACCTGCCCAACTGTGA | 158 | |
| Reverse: AAGCTGTGGCACTGGAAGTC | |||
| Myf5 | Forward: AGACGCCTCAAGAAGGTCAA | 95 | |
| Reverse: CTGAGGATCTCCACCTTGGG | |||
| Myf6 | Forward: CCCTTCAGCTACAGACCCAA | 183 | |
| Reverse: GTCCACGATGGAAGAAAGGC | |||
| MyOD1 | Forward: GTGCAAACGCAAGACCACTA | 125 | |
| Reverse: GATTCGGGTTGCTAGACGTG | |||
| Myog | Forward: AATCTGCACTCCCTCACCTC | 73 | |
| Reverse: TTTCATCTGGGAAGGCCACA | |||
| Pax3 | Forward: CAGCAGAGCAGCTTGAAGAG | 152 | |
| Reverse: CTGCTTCCTCCATCTTGCAC | |||
| Pax7 | Forward: TGCCCTCAGTGAGTTCGATT | 152 | |
| Reverse: ATCCAGACGGTTCCCTTTGT | |||
| MRF4 | Forward: CCCTTCAGCTACAGACCCAA | 183 | |
| Reverse: GAGCAGCTGGAAGTAAAGGC | |||
| MSTN | Forward: AGTGATGGCTCCTTGGAAGA | 169 | |
| Reverse: TCCACAGTTGGGCCTTTACT | |||
| TGFβ-1 | Forward: GCAGGTACTCCTGGTGAACT | 196 | |
| Reverse: AGGATACCAGTCGGGTAGGT | |||
| MYH7 | Forward: TTCAAGCTGGAGCTGGATGA | 152 | |
| Reverse: GTGAGGTCGTTGACAGAACG | |||
| MYH2 | Forward: TAGGCCCTTTGATGCCAAGA | 111 | |
| Reverse: GCTTCCGTCTTCACTGTCAC | |||
| MYH1 | Forward: TCAAGGACACCCAGATCCAC | 166 | |
| Reverse: TCCTGTTCTGCGACTTTCCT | |||
| MYH4 | Forward: GAATCCCTGGACCAACTGGA | 92 | |
| Reverse: CCTCCCTCTGCAATTTGCTC | |||
| GAPDH | Forward: TGGAAAGGCCATCACCATCT | 105 | |
| Reverse: ATGGTCGTGAAGACACCAGT |
IGF1, insulin-like growth factor 1; IGF1r, insulin-like growth factor 1 receptor; AKT, protein kinases; IGFBP5, insulin growth factor-binding protein 5; Myf5, myogenic factor 5; Myf6, myogenic factor 6; MyoD1, myogenic differentiation factor 1; Myog, myogenin; Pax3, paired box gene 3; Pax7, paired box gene 7; MRF4, muscle regulatory factor 4; MSTN, myostatin; TGFβ-1, transforming growth factor-β 1; MYH, myosin heavy chain; GAPDH, glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase.
Effect of maternal methyl-donor micronutrient (MET) supplementation during gestation on growth performance of offspring (n = 21 per group).
| No. of total born per litter | 10.75 ± 2.14 | 10.92 ± 2.10 | 0.840 |
| No. of born alive per litter | 10.58 ± 2.07 | 10.69 ± 2.06 | 0.896 |
| No. of weaned piglets per litter | 9.00 ± 1.48 | 9.36 ± 1.63 | 0.590 |
| Litter weight at birth, kg | 13.10 ± 2.97 | 13.99 ± 2.05 | 0.391 |
| Litter weight at weaning, kg | 58.09 ± 8.27 | 69.40 ± 12.96 | 0.024 |
| Average daily gain during 1–24 days | 0.23 ± 0.03 | 0.26 ± 0.01 | 0.005 |
Data are reported as means ± standard deviation. CON, control diet; MET, methyl-donor micronutrient diet.
Effect of maternal MET supplementation during gestation on nutrition composition, immunoglobulin, total triiodothyronine (T3), and thyroxine (T4) concentrations in colostrum (n = 10 per group).
| Moisture | 73.96 ± 2.77 | 72.45 ± 4.23 | 0.377 |
| TS | 13.89 ± 2.21 | 16.96 ± 3.78 | 0.069 |
| SNF | 8.71 ± 0.49 | 8.74 ± 0.55 | 0.922 |
| Fat | 3.27 ± 0.31 | 3.36 ± 0.38 | 0.603 |
| Lactose | 3.02 ± 0.33 | 2.91 ± 0.37 | 0.493 |
| Protein | 5.49 ± 0.80 | 6.88 ± 1.36 | 0.018 |
| IgM | 3.18 ± 0.25 | 3.88 ± 0.59 | 0.023 |
| IgG | 60.75 ± 6.38 | 67.34 ± 3.68 | 0.060 |
| IgA | 11.11 ± 0.79 | 11.82 ± 0.82 | 0.156 |
| T3, ng/mL | 0.12 ± 0.01 | 0.15 ± 0.02 | 0.005 |
| T4, ng/mL | 4.49 ± 0.94 | 5.63 ± 0.57 | 0.007 |
| T3/T4 | 0.03 ± 0.01 | 0.03 ± 0.00 | 0.177 |
Data are reported as means ± standard deviation. TS, total solids; SNF, solid-non-fat; Ig, immunoglobulin CON, control diet; MET, methyl-donor micronutrient diet.
Effect of maternal MET supplementation during gestation on prolactin concentration in sows' serum and colostrum (n = 10 per group).
| Serum prolactin, ng/L | 220.85 ± 37.20 | 283.32 ± 52.70 | 0.034 |
| Colostrum prolactin, ng/L | 102.46 ± 35.01 | 137.11 ± 9.60 | 0.099 |
Data are reported as means ± standard deviation. CON, control diet; MET, methyl-donor micronutrient diet.
Effect of maternal MET supplementation during gestation on the concentration of S-adenosylmethionine (SAM), S-adenosyl-L-homocysteine (SAH), homocysteine (Hcy), 5-methyl-tetrahydrofolate (5-MTHF), and betaine in sows and offspring umbilical vein serum (n = 10 per group).
| SAM, μmol/mL | 41.98 ± 10.80 | 73.63 ± 15.86 | 0.004 |
| SAH, μmol/mL | 23.76 ± 5.83 | 37.17 ± 7.06 | 0.006 |
| Hcy, nmol/mL | 6.66 ± 1.57 | 4.42 ± 0.66 | 0.005 |
| 5-MTHF, ng/mL | 19.45 ± 8.51 | 30.75 ± 6.93 | 0.030 |
| Betaine, ng/L | 1.01 ± 0.29 | 2.13 ± 0.45 | 0.001 |
| SAM, μmol/mL | 20.16 ± 1.06 | 22.67 ± 1.89 | 0.032 |
| SAH, μmol/mL | 11.19 ± 0.69 | 12.24 ± 0.36 | 0.001 |
| Hcy, nmol/mL | 17.15 ± 1.53 | 15.01 ± 1.26 | 0.033 |
| 5-MTHF, ng/mL | 3.70 ± 0.22 | 3.99 ± 0.35 | 0.037 |
| Betaine, ng/L | 0.37 ± 0.03 | 0.42 ± 0.05 | 0.003 |
Data are reported as means ± standard deviation. CON, control diet; MET, methyl-donor micronutrient diet.
Effects of maternal MET supplementation during gestation on serum concentration of insulin-like growth factor 1 (IGF-1), triiodothyronine (T3), and thyroxine (T4) in offspring (n = 12 at birth; n = 8 at weaning).
| IGF-1, μg/mL | 23.76 ± 2.02 | 25.37 ± 1.37 | 0.048 |
| T3, ng/mL | 0.22 ± 0.02 | 0.36 ± 0.06 | 0.066 |
| T4, ng/mL | 0.99 ± 0.27 | 1.50 ± 0.20 | 0.001 |
| T3/T4 | 0.20 ± 0.04 | 0.16 ± 0.02 | 0.035 |
| IGF-1, μg/mL | 26.17 ± 1.80 | 26.75 ± 2.06 | 0.569 |
| T3, ng/mL | 0.27 ± 0.03 | 0.38 ± 0.06 | 0.010 |
| T4, ng/mL | 1.15 ± 0.27 | 2.10 ± 0.24 | <0.001 |
| T3/T4 | 0.24 ± 0.05 | 0.16 ± 0.02 | 0.033 |
Data are reported as means ± standard deviation. CON, control diet; MET, methyl-donor micronutrient diet.
Figure 1Effects of maternal MET supplementation during gestation on histological properties in offspring longissimus dorsi muscle. Data are reported as means ± standard deviation, n = 12 at birth; n = 8 at weaning. (A) Representative hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) staining of newborn and weaning piglets. (B) Number of muscle fibers per mm2 of weaning offspring. (C) Muscle fiber cross-sectional area of weaning offspring. CON, control diet; MET, methyl-donor micronutrients diet. *P < 0.05 (significant differences between MET vs. CON).
Figure 2Effects of maternal MET supplementation during gestation on IGF system gene mRNA expression and t-AKT and p-AKT protein expression in offspring longissimus dorsi muscle. Data are reported as means ± standard deviation, n = 12 at birth; n = 8 at weaning. (A) IGF system gene mRNA expression in newborn piglets. (B) IGF system gene mRNA expression in weaning piglets. (C) Representative images of immunoblotting. (D) Immunoblotting analysis of t-AKT and p-AKT protein expression in newborn piglets. (E) Immunoblotting analysis of t-AKT and p-AKT protein expression in weaning piglets. t-AKT, protein kinases; p-AKT, phosphorylated protein kinases; IGF1, insulin-like growth factor 1; IGF1r, insulin-like growth factor 1 receptor; IGFBP5, insulin growth factor-binding protein 5; GAPDH, glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase; t, total content, p, phosphorylated; CON, control diet; MET, methyl-donor micronutrient diet. *P < 0.05 (significant differences between MET vs. CON).
Figure 3Effects of maternal MET supplementation during gestation on longissimus dorsi muscle growth-related genes mRNA expression and MyoD1 and Myog protein expression in offspring. Data are reported as means ± standard deviation, n = 12 at birth; n = 8 at weaning. (A) Growth-related gene mRNA expression in newborn piglets. (B) Growth-related gene mRNA expression in weaning piglets. (C) Representative images of immunoblotting. (D) Immunoblotting analysis of MyoD1 and Myog protein expression in newborn piglets. (E) Immunoblotting analysis of MyoD1 and Myog protein expression in weaning piglets. MyoD1, myogenic differentiation factor 1; Myog, myogenin; Myf5, myogenic factor 5; Myf6, myogenic factor 6; Pax3, paired box gene 3; Pax7, paired box gene 7; MRF4, muscle regulatory factor 4; MSTN, myostatin; TGFβ-1, transforming growth factor-β 1; GAPDH, glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase; CON, control diet; MET, methyl-donor micronutrient diet. *P < 0.05 (significant differences between MET vs. CON).
Figure 4Effects of maternal MET supplementation during gestation on longissimus dorsi muscle fiber type-related genes mRNA expression and fast MyHC and slow MyHC protein expression in offspring. Data are reported as means ± standard deviation, n = 12 at birth; n = 8 at weaning. (A) Muscle fiber type-related gene n = 12 at birth; n = 8 at weaning. (A) Muscle fiber expression in weaning piglets. (C) Representative images of immunoblotting. (D) Immunoblotting analysis of fast MyHC and slow MyHC protein expression in newborn piglets. (E) Immunoblotting analysis of fast MyHC and slow MyHC protein expression in weaning piglets. MYH/MyHC, myosin heavy chain; GAPDH, glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase; CON, control diet; MET, methyl-donor micronutrients diet. *P < 0.05 (significant differences between MET vs. CON).