| Literature DB >> 33330552 |
Ying Huang1,2, Xu Zhao2, Zi-Teng Zhang2, Shuai-Shuai Chen2, Shan-Shan Li2, Zhuo Shi2, Jing Jing2, Ang Huang3, Yu-Ming Guo2, Zhao-Fang Bai2, Zheng-Sheng Zou3, Xiao-He Xiao2, Jia-Bo Wang2, Ming Niu2,4.
Abstract
Aim: The diagnosis of drug-induced liver injury (DILI) remains a challenge and the cases of Polygonum multiflorum Thunb. (PM) induced DILI (PM-DILI) have received much attention This study aimed to identify a simple and high-efficiency approach to PM-DILI diagnosis via metabolomics analysis.Entities:
Keywords: Polygonum multiflorum Thunb 3; autoimmune hepatitis; drug-induced liver injury; hepatitis B; metabolomics
Year: 2020 PMID: 33330552 PMCID: PMC7734208 DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2020.592434
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Med (Lausanne) ISSN: 2296-858X
Clinical baseline characteristics of all participants.
| Gender (F/M) | 9/3 | 2/7 | 6/7 | 2/22 |
| Age (y) | 52.8 ± 11.5 | 51 ± 16 | 45.8 ± 13 | 45.0 ± 9.6 |
| IgG (g/L) | 35.3 ± 3.7 | 9.7 ± 2.2 | 32.2 ± 5.4 | 29.5 ± 4.5 |
| IgM (g/L) | 33.6 ± 5.4 | 1.8 ± 1.2 | 28.8 ± 17.1 | 30.1 ± 10.7 |
| Bilirubin (μmol/L) | 26.5 ± 17.2 | 12 ± 7 | 85.8 ± 90.5 | 252.0 ± 127.5 |
| ALT (U/L) | 55.8 ± 24.4 | 31 ± 11 | 372.2 ± 424.5 | 76.6 ± 55.3 |
| AST (U/L) | 62.9 ± 26.9 | 27 ± 10 | 210.2 ± 202.3 | 111.0 ± 69.1 |
| ALP (U/L) | 183.1 ± 94.7 | 77 ± 40 | 127.9 ± 48.7 | 134.6 ± 35.7 |
SD, standard deviation; AIH, autoimmune hepatitis; CON, health controls; DILI, Drug-induced liver injuries; HBV, hepatitis; IgG, immunoglobulin G; IgM, immunoglobulin M; ALT, alanine aminotransferase; AST, aspartate aminotransferase; ALP, alkaline phosphatase.
F for female and M for male.
Figure 1Score plot of PCA model for AIH, CON, DILI, and HBV with the first two principal components. (A) The PCA1 and PCA2 explained 27% variation under ESI- mode. (B) The PCA1 and PCA2 explained 35% variation under ESI+ mode.
Figure 2Discrimination of DILI patients from AIH, HBV, and healthy controls according to orthogonal projection to latent structures discriminate analysis (OPLS-DA) model in the ESI- mode. The points in red indicate the identified biomarkers. (A) Score plot of the OPLS-DA model for the pair-wise comparisons between the AIH and DILI; (B) S-plot of the OPLS-DA model for the AIH and DILI; (C) Score plot of the OPLS-DA model for the CON and DILI; (D) S-plot of the OPLS-DA model for the CON and DILI; (E) Score plot of the OPLS-DA model for the HBV and DILI; (F) S-plot of the OPLS-DA model for the HBV and DILI.
Figure 3Discrimination of DILI patients from AIH, HBV, and healthy controls according to orthogonal projection to latent structures discriminate analysis (OPLS-DA) model in the ESI+ mode. The points in red indicate the identified biomarkers. (A) Score plot of the OPLS-DA model for the pair-wise comparisons between the AIH and DILI; (B) S-plot of the OPLS-DA model for the AIH and DILI; (C) Score plot of the OPLS-DA model for the CON and DILI; (D) S-plot of the OPLS-DA model for the CON and DILI; (E) Score plot of the OPLS-DA model for the HBV and DILI; (F) S-plot of the OPLS-DA model for the HBV and DILI.
Identification of significantly changed metabolites.
| 4-Cresol | 1.20 | C7H8O | 107.0503 |
| Phenylalanine | 1.06 | C9H11NO2 | 164.0729 |
| P-cresol sulfate | 1.34 | C7H8O4S | 187.0042 |
| Oxalosuccinic acid | 1.33 | C6H6O7 | 189.0027 |
| D-Glucuronic acid | 0.90 | C6H10O7 | 193.0388 |
| Deoxyribose 5-phosphate | 3.31 | C5H11O7P | 213.0217 |
| Melatonin | 3.97 | C13H16N2O2 | 231.1098 |
| Inosine | 12.66 | C10H12N4O5 | 267.0696 |
| PA(17:2(9Z,12Z)/0:0) | 18.70 | C20H37O7P | 419.2069 |
| (25S)-5β-cholestane-3α,7α,12α,26-tetrol | 23.11 | C27H48O4 | 435.3601 |
| Glycochenodeoxycholate | 4.33 | C26H43NO5 | 448.2976 |
| LysoPE (0:0/22:6(4Z,7Z,10Z,13Z,16Z,19Z)) | 13.94 | C27H44NO7P | 524.2746 |
| Taurocholate | 15.00 | C26H45NO8S | 530.2818 |
| PA(14:1(9Z)/13:0) | 19.20 | C30H57O8P | 575.3758 |
| PG(14:1(9Z)/18:3(6Z,9Z,12Z)) | 6.53 | C38H67O10P | 713.4488 |
| CoA | 15.02 | C21H36N7O16P3S | 766.1094 |
| Valine | 1.02 | C5H11NO2 | 118.0875 |
| Methionine | 1.05 | C5H11NO2S | 150.0585 |
| Phenylalanine | 1.06 | C9H11NO2 | 166.0875 |
| Coniferyl aldehyde | 18.76 | C10H10O3 | 179.0719 |
| Tyrosine | 1.05 | C9H11NO3 | 182.0776 |
| Phytosphingosine | 11.75 | C18H39NO3 | 318.3045 |
| PE (17:2(9Z,12Z)/0:0) | 10.42 | C22H42NO7P | 464.2905 |
| Bilirubin | 19.93 | C33H36N4O6 | 585.2639 |
| DG(17:2(9Z,12Z)/20:0/0:0) | 19.93 | C40H74O5 | 635.5741 |
[M-H].
Compound in the pathway is LPA.
Compound in the pathway is L-2-LPE.
Compound in the pathway is PA.
Compound in the pathway is PG.
Compound in the pathway is L-1-LPE.
Compound in the pathway is DG.
Figure 4Metabolic network of the significantly changed metabolites. The significantly changed metabolites are shown under the normalized contents. All the P values were calculated using Mann-Whitney Test, * and ** represent p < 0.05 and p < 0.01 compared with the DILI group, respectively. DG, 1,2-diacylglycerol; dR5P, deoxyribose 5-phosphate; PA, phosphatidic acid; PC, phosphatidylcholine; PE, phosphoethanolamine; PG, phosphatidylglycerol; L-1-LPE, L-1-lysophosphoethanolamine; L-2-LPE, L-2-lysophosphoethanolamine; LPA, lysophosphatidic acid; TCA, taurocholic acid; GCDCA, glycochenodeoxycholic acid; F6P, fructose-6-phosphate; G6P, glucose-6-phosphate.
Figure 5Decision tree classification model for the differential diagnosis of DILI. PCS, P-cresol sulfate; Phe, phenylalanine; BIL, bilirubin. (A) Flowchart of the discriminating DILI based on the two ratios of four marker metabolites; (B) Results of the ROC tests that correspond to flowchart A.