| Literature DB >> 33330381 |
Wenjuan Han1, Minhan Li1, Yuanyuan Ma1, Jianping Yang1.
Abstract
Entities:
Keywords: cobalt-base catalysts; electrocatalysts; hydrogen evolution reaction; metal-organic frameworks; water electrolysis
Year: 2020 PMID: 33330381 PMCID: PMC7715014 DOI: 10.3389/fchem.2020.592915
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Chem ISSN: 2296-2646 Impact factor: 5.221
Figure 1Schematic of water electrolysis system.
Figure 2Volcano plot for HER in alkaline medium for various metals. Reproduced with permission (Sheng et al., 2013). Copyright © 2013, Energy Environ. Sci. All rights reserved.
Figure 3N-Doped carbon material derived Co/N-Carbon as an electrocatalyst for HER in 1 M KOH solution. (A) LSV of different electrocatalysts with rotation disk electrode at 1,600 rpm. (B) EIS of different electrocatalysts. Reproduced with permission (Huang et al., 2017). © 2017 ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. All rights reserved.
Figure 4HER performances of Co-MOFs derived metal selenide (CoSe2@DC) in 0.5 M H2SO4. (A,B) Polarization curves of the different samples, (C) the Tafel plots from (A,B,D) Nyquist plots of the different samples. Reproduced with permission (Zhou W. et al., 2016). © 2016 Nano Energy. All rights reserved.
Figure 5Co-MOFs derived metal sulfide for HER electrocatalysis under N2-saturated 0.1 M KOH solution. (A) A schematic illustration of the synthesis of Co/Co9S8@SNGS; (B) Linear sweep voltammetry curves of the different samples; (C) Tafel plots of the different samples. Reproduced with permission (Zhang X. et al., 2016). © 2016 Nano Energy. All rights reserved.
Figure 6HER performances of Co-MOF derived metal phosphide. LSV curves (A), Tafel slope (B) in 1 M PBS, LSV curves (C), Tafel slope (D) in 1 M KOH and LSV curves (E), Tafel slope (F) in 0.5 M H2SO4 of the different samples. Reproduced with permission (Liu et al., 2019a) © 2019 Angew. Chem. Int. Edit. All rights reserved.
Figure 7HER performances of Co-MOFs derived metal phosphide synthesized by controlling the pyrolysis temperature. (A) Calculated free energy diagram of the HER for (i) *H2O and (ii) *1/2H2 on the different samples, (B) The contact angles of a drop of 1.0 M KOH on (i): ZIF67 precursor, (ii): Co/Co2P@ACF/CNT HNCs-800, (iii): Co/Co2P@ACF/CNT HNCs-900, and (iv): Co/Co2P@ACF/CNT HNCs-1000, (C) Calculated DOS of the different samples, (D) NBO charge distribution. Reproduced with permission (Wang F. et al., 2019). © 2019 J. Mater. Chem. A. All rights reserved.
Figure 8(A) The calculated free-energy diagram of the different samples, (B) Calculated DOS curves for CoP and Ni-CoP. Adapted with permission from Pan et al. (2019). © 2019 Nano Energy. All rights reserved. (C) Tafel plots of different catalysts in 1 M KOH solution. (D) Electrochemical impedance spectra of various catalysts at −0.07 V vs. RHE in 1 M KOH solution. Reproduced with permission (Li D. et al., 2018). © 2018 ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. All rights reserved.
Figure 9(A) Calculated free-energy diagram of HER at the equilibrium potential for different models, (B) Tentative model of an alloy core particle consisting of Co and Ir, (C,D) Electrocatalytic HER performance of the catalysts in N2-saturated 0.5 M H2SO4 solution. (C) Polarization curves of the different samples, (D) Tafel plots of the different catalysts. Reproduced with permission (Jiang et al., 2018). © 2018 Adv. Mater. All rights reserved.
Summary of Co-MOFs derived electrocatalysts for HER.
| FeCo-600 | ZIF-67 | 0.285 | 0.5 M H2SO4 | 262 | Yang et al., | |
| Co/Co2P@C-10 | ZIF-67 | 0.2 | 0.5 M H2SO4 | 192 | Yu H. et al., | |
| 1.0 M KOH | 158 | 56.35 | ||||
| CoP@BCN | ZIF-67 | 0.4 | 0.5 M H2SO4 | 87 | 46 | Tabassum et al., |
| 1.0 M KOH | 215 | 52 | ||||
| 1M PBS | 122 | 59 | ||||
| Co-NC/CF | ZIF-67 | 0.649 | 1.0 M KOH | 103 | 109 | Huang et al., |
| Co/NBC-900 | BIF | 2 | 1.0 M KOH | 117 | 146 | Liu et al., |
| CoSe2/CF | ZIF-67 | 2.9 | 1.0 M KOH | 52 | 95 | Sun et al., |
| S-CoWP@(S, N)-C | ZIF-67 | 0.75 | 1.0 M KOH | 35 | 35 | Weng et al., |
| CoSe2@N/C-CNT | ZIF-67 | 0.255 | 0.5 M H2SO4 | 185 | 98 | Ding et al., |
| CoSe2@NC-NR/CNT | ZIF-67 | 1.3 | 0.5 M H2SO4 | 49.8 | Park and Kang, | |
| CoSe2@DC | ZIF-67 | 0.357 | 0.5 M H2SO4 | 132 | 82 | Zhou W. et al., |
| CoSe2(400)-NC-800 | ZIF-67 | 0.212 | 0.5 M H2SO4 | 234 | 95 | Lu et al., |
| NCO@CoS | ZIF-67 | / | 1.0 M KOH | 100 | 68 | Chen W. et al., |
| Co9S8/CoS1.097/rGO | ZIF-67 | 1.684 | 0.5 M H2SO4 | 188 | 96 | Sun et al., |
| Co/Co9S8@SNGS-1000 | ZIF-67 | 1 | 0.1 M KOH | 350 | 96.1 | Zhang X. et al., |
| CoP/Co-MOF/CF | ZIF-67 | 5 | 0.5 M H2SO4 | 21 | 43 | Liu et al., |
| 1.0 M KOH | 34 | 56 | ||||
| 1M PBS | 49 | 63 | ||||
| CoP–CNTs | ZIF-67 | 0.267 | 0.5 M H2SO4 | 139 | 52 | Wu et al., |
| Co/CoP–HNC | ZIF-67 | 0.19 | 1.0 M KOH | 180 | 105.6 | Hao et al., |
| CoP/NCNHP | ZIF-67 | 0.390 | 0.5 M H2SO4 | 140 | 53 | Pan et al., |
| 0.390 | 1.0 M KOH | 115 | 66 | |||
| FexCo2-xP | ZIF-67 | 4 | 1.0 M KOH | 114 | 97 | Singh et al., |
| Co@Ir/NC-10% | ZIF-67 | 0.202 | 0.5 M H2SO4 | 29.4 | 41.9 | Li D. et al., |
| 1.0 M KOH | 121 | 97.6 | ||||
| NC@Cu-Co-W-C-700 | ZIF-67 | 2 | 1.0 M KOH | 98 | 50 | Qiao et al., |
| Co0.6Fe0.4P-1.125 | 0.270 | 0.5 M H2SO4 | 97 | Lian et al., | ||
| ZIF-67 | 1.0 M KOH | 133 | 61 | |||
| 1M PBS | 140 | |||||
| NiCoN/C | ZIF-67 | / | 1.0 M KOH | 103 | Lai et al., | |
| Co-NCF@600-Ni | ZIF-67 | 0.28 | 1.0 M KOH | 157 | 112 | Zhang et al., |
| Ni-CoP/HPFs | ZIF-67 | 0.796 | 0.5 M H2SO4 | 144 | 52 | Pan et al., |
| 1.0 M KOH | 92 | 71 | ||||
| IrCo@NC-500 | ZIF-67 | 0.285 | 0.5 M H2SO4 | 24 | 23 | Jiang et al., |
| N/Co-PCP//NRGO | ZIF-67 | 0.714 | 0.5 M H2SO4 | 126 | Hou et al., | |
| Co-NC/CF | ZIF-67 | 1 | 1.0 M KOH | 157 | 109 | Huang H. et al., |
| Co/Co9S8 | ZIF-67 | 0.64 | 1.0 M KOH | 216 | 80 | Du et al., |
| MOF-CoSe2 | ZIF-67 | 0.539 | 0.5 M H2SO4 | 42 | Lin et al., | |
| CoP - NB | ZIF-67 | 0.707 | 0.5 M H2SO4 | 51 | Wang X. et al., | |
| CoPS@NPS-C (4 wt%) | ZIF-67 | 0.357 | 0.5 M H2SO4 | 93 | 63 | Hu et al., |
| Co0.75Fe0.25-NC | ZIF-67 | 0.212 | 1.0 M KOH | 202 | 67.96 | Feng et al., |
| Zn0.30Co2.70S4 | ZIF-67 | 0.285 | 0.5 M H2SO4 | 80 | 47.5 | Huang et al., |