| Literature DB >> 33330332 |
Ruixia Han1,2, Jian Xu1,2,3, Yan Ge1, Yulin Qin4.
Abstract
Through an online survey of a working population sample (N = 530), this study examines the role of social comparison between social media use and job burnout. The results show that: (1) there is a significant positive correlation between social media use and job burnout; (2) social comparison plays a moderating role in social media's impact on burnout. In high social comparative groups, the moderating role develops into an mediating role, which means that job burnout is only significant when social media addiction and the inclination of social comparison are simultaneously strong; (3) Social media users who often make downward comparison and get positive emotions from it are more prone to job burnout. This study reveals the possible negative effects of overuse of new media and enriches the understanding of how social media shapes individuals' psychology and behavior. Studies have also shown that regulating and controlling social comparisons and avoiding excessive use of social media may be effective in reducing job burnout.Entities:
Keywords: job burnout; mediating role; moderating role; social comparison; social media
Mesh:
Year: 2020 PMID: 33330332 PMCID: PMC7710858 DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2020.588097
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Public Health ISSN: 2296-2565
Figure 1A proposed Core Model.
Distribution of sample socio-demographics.
| Gender | Male | 246 | 44.7 |
| Female | 314 | 55.3 | |
| Education | Junior high school and below | 6 | 1.1 |
| High school | 15 | 1.7 | |
| College/University | 461 | 83.8 | |
| Master | 64 | 11.6 | |
| Doctor and above | 4 | 0.7 | |
| Income per year (Rmb) | <10,000 | 58 | 10.5 |
| 10,000–30,000 | 49 | 8.9 | |
| 30,000–50,000 | 48 | 8.7 | |
| 50,000–100,000 | 186 | 33.8 | |
| 100,000–200,000 | 168 | 30.5 | |
| 200,000–500,000 | 34 | 6.2 | |
| >500,000 | 7 | 1.3 | |
| Age | Mean | 30.5 | |
| Years of Current Job | Mean | 6.61 |
Result of correlation test (N = 530).
| Years of Current Job | 0.121** | ||||
| Wechat Use | −0.075 | −0.037 | |||
| Social Comparison | 0.080 | 0.081 | |||
| Job Burnout | 0.121** | 0.068 | 0.020 | ||
| Mean | 10.72 | 6.61 | 2.9736 | 2.8300 | 4.9875 |
| Sd | 5.857 | 5.080 | 0.59230 | 0.67837 | 0.85416 |
**p < 0.01.
Multiple Regression Analysis for Job Burnout (Standard coefficient; N = 530).
| Gender | 0.054 | 0.067 | 0.053 | 0.074 | 0.074 | |
| Age | 0.178* | 0.194** | 0.178** | 0.198** | 0.208** | |
| Years of Current Job | −0.066 | −0.072 | −0.066 | −0.070 | −0.077 | |
| Independent variable | Wechat Use | 0.137** | 0.153** | −0.227 | ||
| Moderating variable | Social Comparison | 0.005 | −0.047 | −0.508* | ||
| Interaction variable | Wechat Use × Social Comparison | 0.691* | ||||
| 3.500* | 5.178*** | 2.623* | 4.351** | 4.553*** | ||
| Adjusted | 0.014 | 0.031 | 0.012 | 0.031 | 0.139 |
*p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001.
Multi-level regression analysis model of job burnout in high social comparative groups (Standard coefficient; N = 133).
| Gender | 0.198* | 0.231** | 0.156 | 0.190* | 0.200* | |
| Age | −0.004 | 0.082 | −0.020 | 0.045 | 0.024 | |
| Years of Current Job | 0.210 | 0.146 | 0.234* | 0.183 | 0.190 | |
| Independent variable | Wechat Use | 0.251** | 0.179 | −2.380* | ||
| Moderating variable | Social Comparison | 0.260** | 0.198* | −1.029* | ||
| Interaction variable | Wechat Use × Social Comparison | 3.155* | ||||
| 3.181* | 4.648** | 4.961** | 4.835*** | 5.205*** | ||
| Adjusted | 0.047 | 0.100 | 0.107 | 0.127 | 0.160 |
*p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001.
Figure 2The relationship between Wechat Use and Job burnout under different social comparison levels.
Impact of upward comparison and downward comparison of emotion on WeChat Users' Burnout (Standard coefficient; N = 530).
| Gender | 0.075 | 0.075 | 0.067 | 0.067 | |
| Age | 0.010** | 0.010** | 0.009** | 0.009** | |
| Years of Current Job | 0.012 | 0.012 | 0.011 | 0.011 | |
| Independent variable | Wechat Use(WU) | 0.062** | 0.057* | 0.400 | |
| Moderating variable | Pe by Upc | 0.035*** | 0.181 | ||
| Ne by Upc | 0.044** | 0.238 | |||
| Pe by Dnc | 0.034* | 0.162** | |||
| Ne by Dnc | 0.037* | 0.198 | |||
| Interaction variable | Wu × Pe by Upc | 0.059 | |||
| Wu × Ne by Upc | 0.080 | ||||
| Wu × Pe by Dnc | 0.053** | ||||
| Wu × Ne by Dnc | 0.067 | ||||
| 3.500* | 5.178** | 19.868*** | 14.681*** | ||
| Adjusted | 0.014 | 0.031 | 0.222 | 0.237 |
*p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001.