| Literature DB >> 33330141 |
Shinya Kageyama1, Yuka Nagao2, Jiale Ma1, Mikari Asakawa1, Ryoji Yoshida2, Toru Takeshita1,3, Akiyuki Hirosue2, Yoshihisa Yamashita1, Hideki Nakayama2.
Abstract
Salivary microbiota is considered a source of microorganisms for the respiratory and digestive tracts, and a trigger for diseases in these distant organs. Meanwhile, the microbiota on the tongue surface is thought to be a major source of salivary microbiota. Therefore, surgical resection of the tongue for definitive treatment of oral cancer could drastically change the salivary bacterial balance and virulence. Here, we investigated the shift of the salivary microbiota following surgical resection in patients with tongue cancer. The stimulated saliva samples were collected from 25 tongue cancer patients pre- and post-resection of the tongue, and bacterial density and composition was determined using quantitative PCR analysis and 16S ribosomal RNA (rRNA) gene sequencing, respectively. Although no significant difference in the total bacterial density in saliva pre- and post-surgery was observed, the bacterial composition significantly differed according to the analysis of similarity. Among predominant operational taxonomic units (OTUs) with ≥1% of relative abundance, the proportions of OTUs corresponding to Streptococcus salivarius, Prevotella melaninogenica, and Prevotella histicola were significantly decreased following the tongue resection. On the other hand, the proportions of OTUs corresponding to Lautropia mirabilis, Neisseria flava, Streptococcus sanguinis, and Fusobacterium nucleatum, known to be inhabitants of dental plaque, were significantly increased. These results suggest that surgical resection of the tongue causes a compositional shift of the salivary microbiota, characterized by an increase in bacterial species derived from dental plaque, including periodontal pathogens. These results suggest the necessity of more careful and frequent postoperative oral care after surgical resection of tongue cancer.Entities:
Keywords: 16S ribosomal RNA; glossectomy; microbiome; next-generation sequencing; oral surgery; quantitative real-time PCR; saliva; tongue neoplasms
Year: 2020 PMID: 33330141 PMCID: PMC7719762 DOI: 10.3389/fcimb.2020.600884
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Cell Infect Microbiol ISSN: 2235-2988 Impact factor: 5.293
The clinical characteristics of study subjects.
| Clinical characteristics | ||
|---|---|---|
| Age (years), mean ± SD | 64.6 ± 18.2 | |
| Sex, n (%) | Male | 16 (64.0) |
| Female | 9 (36.0) | |
| Number of teeth, mean ± SD | 20.6 ± 7.2 | |
| Smoking habit, n (%) | Current | 8 (32.0) |
| Non-current | 17 (68.0) | |
| Alcohol consumption, n (%) | Everyday | 10 (40.0) |
| Non-everyday | 15 (60.0) | |
| cT-stage, n (%) | 1 | 11 (44.0) |
| 2 | 10 (40.0) | |
| 3 | 4 (16.0) | |
| cN-stage, n (%) | 0 | 23 (92.0) |
| 2b | 2 (8.0) | |
| Antibiotics for biopsy, n (%) | None | 3 (12.0) |
| AMPC | 19 (76.0) | |
| CDTR-PI | 1 (4.0) | |
| CFPN-PI | 1 (4.0) | |
| Antibiotics for surgery, n (%) | CMZ | 23 (92.0) |
| CEZ and CTRX | 1 (4.0) | |
| CMZ and SBT/ABPC | 1 (4.0) | |
| Reconstructive surgery, n (%) | Yes | 6 (24.0) |
| No | 19 (76.0) | |
AMPC, amoxicillin; CDTR-PI, cefditoren pivoxil; CFPN-PI, cefcapene pivoxil; CMZ, cefmetazole; CEZ, cefazolin; CTRX, ceftriaxone; SBT/ABPC, sulbactam/ampicillin; cT-stage, clinical tumor stage; cN-stage, clinical nodal stage; SD, standard deviation.
Bacterial density and diversity in pre- and post-treatment samples.
| Pre-treatment (n=25) | Post-treatment (n=25) | P value | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Bacterial density (log copies/ml), mean ± SD | 9.85 ± 0.41 | 9.96 ± 0.33 | 0.35 |
| Bacterial diversity | |||
| Number of OTU, mean ± SD | 147.5 ± 31.1 | 132.6 ± 22.9 | 0.015 |
| Shannon index, mean ± SD | 3.4 ± 0.35 | 3.4 ± 0.30 | 0.58 |
SD, standard deviation.
Figure 1A principal coordinate analysis (PCoA) based on weighted UniFrac distance. The bacterial composition of pre- and post-treatment samples are depicted using different colors. These two components explain the 61.5% variance. The intersection of the broken lines indicates the center of gravity for each group. The ellipse covers 67% of the samples belonging to each group.
Figure 2Bacterial species corresponding to the differentially abundant operational taxonomic units (OTUs) between pre- and post-treatment samples. Bar plots show mean relative abundances of differentially abundant OTUs. Only nine OTUs with ≥1% of the relative abundance and significant difference were shown. The bar plots of pre- and post-treatment samples are depicted using different colors. Error bars indicate 95% confidence intervals. Oral taxon IDs are given in parentheses following bacterial names. **P < 0.01. *P < 0.05.