| Literature DB >> 33329921 |
Salini D Rajendran1, Siti N Wahab1, Swee P Yeap2.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Personal protective equipment (PPE) has been designed in such a way to reduce accident rates. Unfortunately, existing PPE is rather ineffective as it is not able to provide warning signals when hazard is around. The integration of intelligent systems is envisaged to increase the efficiency of existing PPE.Entities:
Keywords: Metal detector; Safety vest; Smart PPE; Workplace accident
Year: 2020 PMID: 33329921 PMCID: PMC7728712 DOI: 10.1016/j.shaw.2020.06.007
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Saf Health Work ISSN: 2093-7911
Fig. 1Overview on the installation of the prototyped smart safety vest.
Fig. 2Front, interior, and back views of the prototyped smart safety vest.
Summary of characteristics of the 121 respondents
| Gender | Age range (years old) | Working experience | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 20-24.9 | 25-29.9 | 30-34.9 | Yes | No | ||
| Male | 72 | 69 | 3 | 0 | 36 | 36 |
| Female | 49 | 45 | 3 | 1 | 22 | 27 |
| Total | 121 | |||||
Note that the working experience refers to whether the respondents have attended internship in the actual engineering industry before they answered this questionnaire.
Fig. 3Respondents' agreement on the better protection provided by a hazard-sensing safety vest as compared with the conventional vest.
Rating on the design of the smart safety vest
| Criteria | Mean rating | Rate 1 (poor) | Rate 2 (moderate) | Rate 3 (good) | Rate 4 (excellent) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Design simplicity | 3.140 | — | 19 | 66 | 36 |
| Ease of use | 3.198 | 1 | 17 | 60 | 43 |
| Light weight | 3.256 | 1 | 18 | 51 | 51 |
| Level of effectiveness | 2.083 | 30 | 59 | 24 | 8 |
| Practicability | 2.339 | 22 | 48 | 39 | 12 |
| Environmental friendliness | 3.017 | 3 | 24 | 62 | 32 |
Summary comments given by the respondents regarding strengths and weaknesses of the current prototype version
| Strengths | Weaknesses |
|---|---|
Can avoid accident at dark places. | I think the weakness is that the metal sensor can only sense the danger in a close distance. |
Ease of use, easy to install, and very good concept. | Range of the sensor too short. Not enough time to react. |
The signal given is very clear. | Range to detect should be longer. Minimum of from 1 meter to 50 cm away. |
Robust and light. | Sound produced is not loud. If the working environment is loud, will not be able to hear it. |
It can help us to detect anything that might cause us dangerous while we are paying attention on our task without noticing the thing behind or come close to us. | Will be more expensive than conventional vest |
Environmentally friendly with solar power recharging. | Water or sweat might affect the electronic system. |
Fig. 4The respondents' rating on their likelihood to buy and use this newly designed product.