| Literature DB >> 33329881 |
Dorothy Ofoha1, Rotimi Ogidan1.
Abstract
While parental harsh disciplining of children is a global concern, children living in Nigeria often experience particularly high levels of harsh discipline. Constrained by the lack of parenting skills to effectively manage children, most Nigerian parents rely too heavily on the use of violent methods in the disciplining of their children, which poses a huge threat to their well-being and development. Given the high levels of harsh parenting and the lack of understanding of its harms, we set out to develop a program of intervention called Psychoeducational parenting program to prevent violence against children (PEPVAC), guided by psychological principles of social learning theory, to help parents reverse the trend. We tested the effectiveness of the program using a quasi-experimental design with questionnaire and observation as data collection tools. Participants were 300 parents of children age 3-12 years, who endorsed using harsh discipline. Parents (n = 150) who received the 8-week intervention were compared with parents in the control group (n = 150). A mixed-model ANOVA revealed that the PEPVAC parents demonstrated a reduced use of harsh disciplinary tactics and a decreased incidence of parents beating their children compared to parents in the control group who continued with business-as-usual. Findings suggest that PEPVAC can be a useful intervention tool in the prevention of punitive violence against children, especially in a culturally-oriented country like Nigeria with over 91 million population of children who are at risk of disciplinary violence in the home.Entities:
Keywords: Child beating; child development.; harsh discipline; parenting intervention; punitive violence
Year: 2020 PMID: 33329881 PMCID: PMC7735519 DOI: 10.21500/20112084.4604
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Psychol Res (Medellin) ISSN: 2011-2084
Summary of Participants Characteristics (N = 300)
| Description | M or % | |
| 1. Gender | Male | 51(17%) |
| Female | 249(83%) | |
| 2. Age | 15-24 years | 30(10%) |
| 25-34 years | 116(38.7%) | |
| 35-44 years | 112(37.3%) | |
| Above 45 years | 42(14%) | |
| 3. Educational level | No formal education | 44(14.7%) |
| Primary education | 59(19.7%) | |
| Secondary education | 104(34.7%) | |
| Higher education | 93(31%) | |
| 4. Employment status | Unemployed | 8(2.7%) |
| Self-employed | 43(14.3%) | |
| Part-time employment | 160(53.3%) | |
| Full-time employment | 89(29.7%) | |
| 5. Marital status | Married | 238(79.3%) |
| Divorced/separated/widowed | 41(13.7%) | |
| Single parent who has never married | 20(6.7%) | |
| 6. Number of’ children of parents within ages 3-12 years | 1 child | 57(19%) |
| 2 children | 84(28%) | |
| 3 children | 86(29%) | |
| 4 children | 55(18%) | |
| 5 children | 11(4%) | |
| 6 children | 7(2%) |
Summary of PEPVAC intervention Package
| Session Topic | Session Content Description | |
| Session 1 | Orientation and introduction | The session provided a general overview of PEPVAC, the overall goals and expected outcomes. |
| Session 2 | Understanding the developmental stages of children Positive communication-focus on ‘dos’ instead of ‘don’ts | The session taught parents about the stages of child development to understand why children behave the way they do. Parents learnt about the strategies for focusing on dos instead of donts, and how to limit their use of negatives. |
| Session 3 | Age-appropriate expectations for behavior Fostering positive parent child interactions | This session discussed behaviors that can be expected from children at different stages and what is appropriate at given ages. Parents learnt on how to interact positively with children. |
| Session 4 | Common childhood behavior problems and the reinforcing factors - parental attention Parents as role models to their children | The session discussed common childhood behavior problems and how the constant use of punishment can reinforce bad behaviors. Parents learnt the importance of modeling good behavior and how children learn through observation. |
| Session 5 | The harmful effects of harsh discipline part 1 (physical and social effects). Focus attention on good behavior | The session familiarized parents on the effects of harsh discipline on physical and social development of children. Parents learnt how to pay attention on good behavior, how to observe and catch children being good and praising their actions. |
| Session 6 | The harmful effects of harsh discipline part 2 (cognitive & psychological effects) Ignore unwanted behaviors | Parents learnt about the effects of harsh discipline on cognitive and psychological development of children. Parents learnt on how to use ignoring strategy to decrease unwanted behaviors. |
| Session 7 | Non-violent disciplinary methods Praise child when he/she behaves well | Parent learnt examples of how to use non-violent methods and how to raise children without the use of violence. Parents learnt how to use praise strategy to increase desired behaviors and how to praise and reward the child. |
| Session 8 | Review session and closing ceremony | Parents reviewed all skills learned and developed an action plan by committing to contribute to the reduction of harmful practices. |
Note. Each program session followed the same 7-step format:
1. Recap skills taught in the previous session (after first session) (10 minutes)
2. Content instruction on child development (35 minutes)
3. Content instruction on positive parenting strategies (35 minutes)
4. Short Break: energizer /folksongs (5 minutes)
5. Group activities and skill practice (25 minutes)
6. Summary (10 minutes)
7. Refreshments
Means (M), standard deviations (SD), and ANOVA Results for outcome measures by time point and condition
| Intervention (n = 150) | Control (n = 150) | Analysis | |||||||||||
| Mesasure | Pre M(SD) | Post M(SD) | Follow-up M(SD) | Pre M(SD) | Post M(SD) | Follow-up M(SD) | Group Effect | Time Effect | Group X Time | ||||
| F | η2 | F | η2 | F | η2 | ||||||||
| Self Ratings | 15.77 (4.056) | 11.97 (4.118) | 11.15 (4.303) | 16.90 (5.37) | 17.34 (5.313) | 15.41 (5.273) | 69.558** | .190 | 46.922** | .241 | 20.662** | .123 | |
| Observations | 16.42 (5.011) | 12.57 (4.318) | 12.31 (4.333) | 16.27 (5.24) | 16.34 (5.105) | 15.56 (4.613) | 57.603** | .175 | 51.577** | .364 | 23.931** | .318 | |
Note. Lower mean scores suggest improvement
∗ ∗ p < .01.