| Literature DB >> 33329559 |
Ali Amini1,2, Declan Pang2, Carl-Philipp Hackstein1,2, Paul Klenerman1,2.
Abstract
Mucosal-associated invariant T (MAIT) cells are innate-like T cells present at considerable frequencies in human blood and barrier tissues, armed with an expanding array of effector functions in response to homeostatic perturbations. Analogous to other barrier immune cells, their phenotype and function is driven by crosstalk with host and dynamic environmental factors, most pertinently the microbiome. Given their distribution, they must function in diverse extracellular milieus. Tissue-specific and adapted functions of barrier immune cells are shaped by transcriptional programs and regulated through a blend of local cellular, inflammatory, physiological, and metabolic mediators unique to each microenvironment. This review compares the phenotype and function of MAIT cells with other barrier immune cells, highlighting potential areas for future exploration. Appreciation of MAIT cell biology within tissues is crucial to understanding their niche in health and disease.Entities:
Keywords: diet; metabolism; microbiome; microenvironment; mucosal immunology; mucosal-associated invariant T cells; tissue resident cells
Mesh:
Year: 2020 PMID: 33329559 PMCID: PMC7734211 DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2020.584521
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Immunol ISSN: 1664-3224 Impact factor: 7.561
MAIT cells in healthy human barrier tissues.
| Barrier tissue MAIT location | Frequency | Phenotype and activation | Ref |
|---|---|---|---|
|
| |||
|
| No enrichment compared to blood | ↑CD103+ (20-80%) – most are CD8+
| ( |
|
| |||
|
| LPMC 2% (0-12%) | ↑CD103+CD69+ (80%) | ( |
|
| 1.7% | ↓IL-18Rα | ( |
|
| IEL | ( | |
|
| No data in healthy | Most CD8+ CD103+
| *( |
|
| 2% (0.5-8%) | CD8+ > DN MAIT | ( |
|
| 0.5% (0.2-1%) | CD8α (30%), Ki67 (20%) | ( |
|
| |||
|
| 5% (Endobronchial biopsy) | ( | |
|
| 6% [TRAV1-2+%CD8] | ( | |
|
| 0.8% | CD127+IL-18Rα+ (>90%) | ( |
|
| 2% | ( | |
|
| 2% | ↑CD103+ (75%), | ( |
|
| 1% | Most CD103− – in CAP >50% CD103+
| *( |
|
| |||
|
| 3.8+/-0.32% (by IF) | ↑CLA+ (80%) | ( |
|
| |||
|
| 1% | ↓PLZF | ( |
|
| 2% | ↓Eomes | ( |
|
| 2% | ↑CD69 (80%), CD25 (25%), HLA-DR (35%), PD-1 (70%), Ki67 (15%) | ( |
Location, frequency, phenotype, and function of MAIT cells in healthy human tissue compiled from studies to date. Frequency is expressed as a % of total CD3+ unless otherwise specified. Studies highlighted (*) defined MAIT cells using MR1-tetramer. All other studies used proxy measures of variable stringency to identify MAIT cells, predominantly CD161+Va7.2+. Enrichment and comparisons of phenotype or function are compared to blood. BAL, bronchoalveolar lavage; Ca, cancer; CAP, community acquired pneumonia; DN, double negative; GzmB, granzyme B; DP, decidua parietalis; DN, double negative; IEL, intraepithelial lymphocytes; IF, immunofluorescence; IVB, intervillous blood; LPL, lamina propria lymphocytes.
Figure 1Summary of mucosal environmental factors which could influence immune responses directly and indirectly. Created with Biorender.com.
Environmental factors and sensors.
| Protein Atlas | Fergusson ( | Park ( | Salou ( | Hinks ( | Hinks TCR ( | Lamichhane E.coli ( | Leng TCR ( | Sharma anti-CD3 ( | Sharma BCG ( | Lu CAP ( | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
| |||||||||||
| Hypoxia | HIF1A (effector) | ↑ | ↑ | ↑ | ↑ | BAL > Blood MAIT17 | ||||||
| Acidosis | GPR65 | ↑ | ↑ | ↑ | ↑ | ↑ | ↑ | MAIT17 | ||||
| Osmolarity | NFAT5 | ↑ | ↑ | ↑ | ↑ | |||||||
| Mechanical | PIEZO1 | ↑ | ||||||||||
|
| ||||||||||||
| Vitamin A | RARG | ↑ | ↑ | ↑ | ↑ | ↑ | ||||||
| Vitamin D | VDR | ↑ | ↑ | ↑ | ↑ | |||||||
| Lactate | SLC16A1( | ↑ | ↑ | ↑ | ||||||||
| Tryptophan metabolites | AHR | ↑ | BAL > Blood | |||||||||
| GPR35 | ↑ | ↑ | ||||||||||
| Oxysterols | GPR183 | ↑ | MAIT1 | |||||||||
| Purines | P2RX7 | ↓ | ||||||||||
| P2RY14 | ↑ | ↑ | ↑ | |||||||||
|
| ||||||||||||
| Noradrenaline | ADRB2 | ↑ | ↑ | ↑ | ↑ | ↓ | ↓ | |||||
| Neuromedin U | NMUR1 | ↑ | ↑ | ↓ | ||||||||
| BigLEN | GPR171 | ↑ | ↑ | ↑ | ↑ | ↑ | ↑ | ↑ |
Examples of tissue factors which could modify human MAIT cells in an analogous manner to other resident immune cells. Transcriptional expression of purported sensors*, in some cases including relevant non-sensor genes. All transcriptional datasets are from human blood MAIT cells, except (29) which is from matched BAL and blood MAIT cells. Protein atlas, genes enriched in MAIT cells compared to other blood immune cells; Fergusson (45), genes enriched in CD161+ T cells; Park (46), genes enriched in CD161+ Va7.2+ compared to conventional T cells; Salou (47), genes enriched in MAIT cells compared to conventional CD8+ T cells; Hinks (48), genes enriched in MR1-tetramer+ MAIT cells compared to CD8+ T cells; Hinks TCR (48), genes upregulated on 5-OP-RU activation of MAIT cells; Lamichhane E coli (49), genes upregulated on E coli activation of MAIT cells; Leng (20), genes enriched in MAIT cells stimulated with TCR-dynabeads; Sharma (50), genes upregulated with anti-CD3 or BCG stimulation; Lu (29), genes enriched in BAL MAIT cells from children with community acquired pneumonia (CAP). MAIT17 = type-17 MAIT cells; MAIT1 = type-1 MAIT cells.
Figure 2Potential regulation of the MAIT cell transcriptome and effector function by environmental cues. MAIT cells can be activated (A) independent of TCR-ligands by cytokines, or (B) through TCR-mediated recognition of microbial-derived riboflavin derivates presented by MR1. These signals can work both independently and synergistically to induce a spectrum of different effector programs. Cytokine-mediated MAIT activation results in the induction of a strong anti-microbial program (C), including the production of cytokines like IFNγ, IL-26 and members of the IL-17 family as well as pro-inflammatory chemokines like CXCL9 and CXCL10. These antimicrobial functions are further amplified with concurrent TCR signaling. TCR signals result in the induction of a homeostatic response (D), including cytokines associated with barrier maintenance (IL-22, IL-17), and proteins associated with tissue repair, such as the endoprotease furin. MAIT cells effector functions are controlled by the transcription factors PLZF, RoRγt, and Tbet. Importantly, while PLZF expression within MAITs is stable, expression of the homeostatic effector program is associated with increased expression of RoRγt and decreased expression of Tbet. Finally, TCR-mediated MAIT cell activation also leads to expression of HIF1A, another transcription factor associated with tissue repair. In addition to TCR-ligands and cytokines, several other factors have the potential to modulate MAIT cell activation. Bile acids and L-lactate were shown to generally reduce MAIT cell responses, while binding of Vitamin D to its receptor (VDR), the expression of which is upregulated in MAIT cells in response to TCR-signaling, has the potential to specifically inhibit the homeostatic response. In contrast, recognition of several other metabolites including AhR ligands, Vitamin A and lipids was associated with the expression of homeostatic effector molecules in other T cell populations and hence, could positively influence the expression of these molecules in MAIT cells as well. Similarly, short-chain fatty acids (SCFA), a product of bacterial metabolism, were shown to stimulate production of IL-22 and expansion of RORγt-expression lymphocytes in other immune cells, while reducing the antimicrobial function of MAIT cells, which could overall present a mechanism to preserve tissue homeostasis. Created with Biorender.com.