| Literature DB >> 33329543 |
Chen Wang1, Yu Ding1, Yuanyong Liu2, Qingchen Zhang3, Shiqiang Xu2, Liliang Xia2, Huangqi Duan1, Shujun Wang2, Ping Ji2, Weiren Huang4, Guoping Zhao5, Zhiwei Cao3, Haibo Shen1, Ying Wang2,5.
Abstract
Introduction and Objective: Neoantigen-based immunotherapy is one of the breakthroughs in cancer immunotherapy. Benefit from the Cancer Genome Atlas database, we intended to identify mutant peptides with neoantigen property in bladder cancer (BC). Correlations between the immunoreactivity of candidate neoantigens and clinical manifestations were further analyzed.Entities:
Keywords: bladder cancer; immunoreactivity; inflammation; mutated peptides; neoantigen; the Cancer Genome Atlas database
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 33329543 PMCID: PMC7734250 DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2020.576603
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Immunol ISSN: 1664-3224 Impact factor: 7.561
Demographic descriptions.
| Characteristics | Cohort (n=40) |
|---|---|
|
| 68 ± 13 |
|
| |
| male | 33(82.5%) |
| female | 7 (17.5%) |
|
| |
| Pathologic Tumor Stage | |
| Ta, T1 | 32 (80%) |
| T2 | 4 (10%) |
| T3 | 3 (7.5%) |
| T4 | 1 (2.5%) |
| Pathologic Nodal Stage | |
| N0 | 40(100%) |
| Histology | |
| Urothelial carcinoma | 40 (100%) |
|
| |
| Median leukocyte, 10^9/L(IQR) | 6.35(4.93–8.73) |
| Median neutrophils, 10^9/L(IQR) | 3.77(2.83–6.39) |
| Median neutrophils proportion, %(IQR) | 61.7(55.65–73.35) |
| Mean ± SD lymphocytes, 10^9/L | 1.59 ± 0.54 |
| Mean ± SD lymphocytes proportion, % | 24.91 ± 11.03 |
| Median monocytes, 10^9/L(IQR) | 0.50(0.40-0.70) |
| Mean ± SD monocytes proportion, % | 7.95 ± 2.39 |
| Median platelets, 10^9/L(IQR) | 180.50(153.25–225.25) |
| Median neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio (IQR) | 2.39(1.67–4.99) |
| Median platelet/lymphocyte ratio (IQR) | 114.27(89.76–184.72) |
| Mean ± SD lymphocyte/monocyte ratio | 3.27 ± 1.56 |
IQR, interquartile range.
The information of 57 predicted HLA-A*02:01 restricted wildtype (WT) and mutant (MT) peptide pairs.
| Gene | Substitution (WT,AA#,MT) | Predicted peptides | Expression | Score | Gene | Substitution (WT,AA#,MT) | Predicted peptides | Expression | Score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| WT | Affinity | MT | Affinity | WT | Affinity | MT | Affinity | ||||||||
| AHNAK | D4855Y |
| 10911.65 |
| 21.03 | 19116.15 | 208186680.1 | EML4 | G786V | QVFGVWPE | 19946.11 | QVFGVWPE | 31.08 | 1711.52 | 34084938.73 |
| PPIB | D56Y |
| 13532.17 |
| 41.73 | 13270.20 | 179020773.9 | DPP9 | R854L | I | 18819 | I | 21.79 | 1810.09 | 34024615.98 |
| ATF4 | D336Y |
| 17143.93 |
| 22.83 | 6800.98 | 116440272.2 | CC2D1A | P813L | V | 20362.16 | V | 17.41 | 1616.66 | 32890601.35 |
| MYH9 | E1347K |
| 4348.57 |
| 46.01 | 25557.15 | 109961178.7 | RUNX1 | R130I | A | 16628.02 | A | 20.36 | 1926.20 | 31989630.5 |
| CAP1 | K37Q | S | 11105.08 | S | 13.72 | 8707.71 | 96580330.6 | FNDC3B | S1042L | F | 13947.8 | F | 26.58 | 2285.61 | 31818437.06 |
| SYNPO2 | P652L | Q | 26326.41 | Q | 40.51 | 3512.41 | 92326931.54 | TP63 | S189L | K | 9726.04 | K | 15.67 | 3218.87 | 31256418.99 |
| RHOB | P75L | Y | 16245.84 | Y | 15.23 | 5673.98 | 92092093.75 | LIG1 | P283L | K | 22825.32 | K | 22.26 | 1317.29 | 30038344.31 |
| SND1 | R466L | GLATVIRY | 20843.64 | GLATVIRY | 29.34 | 4335.36 | 90237563.24 | ANP32A | S56L | T | 9377.99 | T | 22.14 | 3112.45 | 29119655.22 |
| CDKN1A | G61V | FVTETPLE | 14683.37 | FVTETPLE | 24.21 | 5955.84 | 87307609.97 | COL12A1 | S395L | L | 6121.63 | L | 12.3 | 4560.59 | 27862146.59 |
| ACTB | R196C | YLMKILTE | 674.92 | YLMKILTE | 18.33 | 122917.87 | 80706643.61 | ALDH16A1 | G343V | GLDGAVDM | 18989.79 | GLDGAVDM | 41.31 | 1376.70 | 26086296.66 |
| PPP2R1A | S314L | L | 9585.42 | L | 19.49 | 8184.12 | 78288742.91 | DSG3 | S273L | Y | 9423.05 | Y | 44.34 | 2684.78 | 25179791.6 |
| ITGB4 | S344L | HLLDSKVP | 5661.01 | HLLDSKVP | 40.66 | 12521.32 | 70374208.67 | MET | R1148Q | L | 12216.93 | L | 13.19 | 2054.12 | 25067898.47 |
| MKI67 | H84L | K | 23696.01 | K | 27.55 | 2799.86 | 66268274.96 | ATP13A1 | R1079L | YLYREAQA | 11916.14 | YLYREAQA | 15.58 | 2105.82 | 25060418.29 |
| PRDX1 | F42L | F | 5854.1 | F | 17.61 | 10921.26946 | 63741879.99 | CD81 | P53S | K | 2417.19 | K | 48.97 | 10442.95 | 24731207.5 |
| DDB1 | S25L | T | 10431.97 | T | 14.88 | 6098.820878 | 63531965.98 | PIK3C2B | R843Q | K | 15638.41 | K | 45.87 | 1584.98 | 24713905.56 |
| AZIN1 | G376V | CLLPELNV | 12266.33 | CLLPELNV | 29.87 | 3945.14276 | 48274581.58 | TAOK3 | R676L | I | 26267.8 | I | 39.49 | 930.91 | 24416274.22 |
| TP53 | R273L | F | 26951.83 | F | 35.31 | 1698.218142 | 45710122.58 | RHOB | S85L | F | 4088.4 | F | 10.19 | 5673.98 | 23139666.2 |
| SIK1 | P84L | QLMKLLNH | 9706.8 | QLMKLLNH | 37.74 | 4408.544858 | 42626484.74 | ADIPOR1 | G328V | RIPERFFP | 8412.46 | RIPERFFP | 11.26 | 2752.04 | 23120429.97 |
| RUVBL1 | P412L | T | 26279.17 | T | 49.33 | 1612.110236 | 42285393.55 | PRDX6 | R108W | IIDDRN | 4439.42 | IIDDRN | 34.63 | 5202.54 | 22916095.26 |
| IRF2BP2 | S195L | G | 11596.13 | G | 45.06 | 3548.308467 | 40986759.48 | LRRC14 | P27L | L | 24049.1 | L | 49.58 | 941.28 | 22590297.36 |
| CDC42 | P73L | Y | 5996.74 | Y | 2.89 | 6753.099448 | 40477065.13 | MFSD5 | R280Q | A | 18110.07 | A | 43.27 | 1246.80 | 22525601.83 |
| HK2 | E774V | LLFRGRIS | 16022.92 | LLFRGRIS | 24.04 | 2502.109804 | 40030954.5 | GAK | F529L | L | 9737.94 | L | 35.72 | 2306.14 | 22374682.88 |
| CREBBP | R1446L | L | 22971.74 | L | 26.32 | 1721.651278 | 39504011.67 | MYO5B | D1586Y |
| 15279.98 |
| 25.45 | 1446.60 | 22067162.35 |
| SUMO1 | P58L | V | 18628.77 | V | 19.41 | 2091.24 | 38916550.19 | DNAJC13 | F1325L | L | 16080.23 | L | 42.47 | 1366.18 | 21910499.3 |
| TNKS2 | P804L | L | 25549.37 | L | 19.97 | 1498.065 | 38244701.73 | PCBP1 | S223L | Y | 2607.71 | Y | 8.79 | 8300.84 | 21573226.87 |
| EIF4G2 | F855L | MLLRFFVH | 2067.69 | MLLRFFVH | 16.69 | 18414.53 | 37768196.89 | NUP210 | S194L | S | 10602.55 | S | 39.96 | 2034.74 | 21492140.04 |
| RUNX1 | R205L | RLSELEQL | 19337.71 | RLSELEQL | 24.63 | 1926.20 | 37200803.3 | GAK | S829L | V | 9240.21 | V | 42.09 | 2306.14 | 21212157.43 |
| CDK16 | S92L | A | 12127.5 | A | 40.76 | 2835.29 | 34269380.71 | PNPLA2 | F147L | G | 8704.87 | G | 20.63 | 2399.23 | 20835460.71 |
| OGDH | D612Y |
| 11605.41 |
| 21.58 | 2957.79 | 34262533.63 | ||||||||
*red colored letters: amino acid substitution.
Figure 1Determination of peptide binding affinity to HLA-A2. (A) The mean fluorescence index (MFI) values of HLA-A2 molecules on T2 cells after incubating with 57 pairs HLA-A*0201 restricted wildtype (WT) and mutant (MT) peptides individually. (B) The MFI values of HLA-A2 molecules from 18 pairs HLA-A*0201 WT and MT peptides in a repetitive experiment. (C) The MFI values of HLA-A2 molecules at different concentrations of 12 MT peptides. (D) The Kd values of 12 MT peptides.
Figure 2Determination of the Immunoreactivity to WT and MT peptides in HLA-A2+ BC patients. (A) Representatives of peptide-specific IFN-γ releases by an ELISPOT assay. PBMCs from Patient 25 were isolated and stimulated with 12 WT and MT peptides individually in vitro for 20 h. RPMI 1640 medium was used as BLANK while PHA as a positive control. The number of the spot-forming units (SFUs) of each well was shown as well. (B) The SFUs specific to 12 WT and MT peptides in Patient 25. (C) The average SFUs of 12 WT and MT peptides in 40 HLA-A2+ BC patients (the average SFUs = total SFUs from the tested peptides/the number of tested peptides). (D) Comparison of average SFUs between WT and MT peptides by the paired Student t test. Each line represented one patient.
Figure 3Correlations between MT peptides-specific SFUs and clinical manifestations. (A–C) Correlations between the average MT-specific SFUs (MT-SFUs) and the leukocytes (A), platelets (B) and thrombocytocrit (C). (D) Comparison of the average MT-SFUs between CRP < 8 mg/mL (indicated as “0”) and CRP ≥ 8 mg/mL (indicated as “1”). (E) Correlation between the average MT-SFUs and neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio. (F) Correlation between the average MT-SFUs and platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio. Pearson correlation analysis was used for correlation analysis except for CRP by Student t test.
Figure 4Correlations between MT-SFUs and clinical manifestations in HighR group. Forty HLA-A2+ BC patients were subgrouped into LowR (n = 22) and HighR (n = 18) groups according to the SFUs to individual peptides. (A) The SFUs upon WT and MT peptides stimulation were compared in HighR group patients. Each line represented one patient in HighR group. (B, C) Comparison of the platelet (B) and thrombocytocrit (C) between LowR and HighR groups. (D, E) Correlations between the average MT-SFUs in HighR group and lymphocyte proportion (D), LMR(E) and NLR (F). All data were normally distributed after logarithmic transformation and Pearson correlation analysis was used.
Figure 5Somatic mutations and clinical outcome from TCGA database. (A) Positive rates of the immunoreactivity to individual MT peptides in 40 HLA-A2+ BC patients. (B) Kaplan–Meier curve of BC patients with (altered group) or without mutations (unaltered group) in 6 genes from the TCGA database. (C) The number of the cases and median disease-free months of BC patients with or without mutations in 6 genes.