| Literature DB >> 33328750 |
Tong Chen1, Xuan Wang1, Xin Wang1, Haishan Chen1, Hua Xiao1, Hongjuan Tang1, Ling Feng1, Zhicong Xiang1, Hequn Zou1,2, Xiaofei Shao1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: To determine the optimal cut-off values and evaluate the associations of product of triacylglycerol and glucose (TyG), lipid accumulation product (LAPI), visceral adiposity index (VAI) with chronic kidney diseases (CKD) stratified by sex.Entities:
Keywords: chronic kidney diseases; lipid accumulation product; product of triacylglycerol and glucose; visceral adiposity index
Year: 2020 PMID: 33328750 PMCID: PMC7735784 DOI: 10.2147/DMSO.S286565
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Diabetes Metab Syndr Obes ISSN: 1178-7007 Impact factor: 3.168
Baseline Characteristics of the Study Population
| Males (n=1002) | Females (n=1718) | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Parameters | CKD (-) | CKD (+) | P | CKD (-) | CKD (+) | P |
| Age (years) | 54.0 (14.4) | 63.9 (12.6) | <0.001 | 52.7 (13.7) | 63.6 (13.4) | <0.001 |
| Education (high school or above, n (%)) | 395 (47.5%) | 59 (34.7%) | <0.01 | 512 (37.0%) | 43 (17.1%) | <0.001 |
| History of hypertension, n (%) | 204 (24.5%) | 100 (59.2%) | <0.001 | 280 (19.3%) | 135 (50.4%) | <0.001 |
| History of diabetes, n (%) | 56 (6.7%) | 35 (20.7%) | <0.001 | 93 (6.4%) | 43(16.0%) | <0.001 |
| Physical activity, n (%) | 463 (55.6%) | 101 (59.4%) | 0.37 | 797 (56.0%) | 173 (64.8%) | 0.008 |
| Current smoking, n (%) | 270 (32.5%) | 53 (31.2%) | 0.75 | 13 (0.9%) | 1 (0.4%) | 0.39 |
| Current alcohol use, n (%) | 115 (13.8%) | 25 (14.7%) | 0.76 | 13 (0.9%) | 1 (0.4%) | 0.38 |
| Height (cm) | 166.66 (6.52) | 165.30 (5.96) | 0.012 | 155.41 (5.86) | 153.06 (6.59) | <0.001 |
| Weight (kg) | 67.18 (10.39) | 68.69 (10.94) | 0.088 | 56.68 (8.59) | 58.75 (9.95) | <0.001 |
| Waist circumference (cm) | 87.54 (9.43) | 91.08 (9.83) | <0.001 | 81.23 (9.67) | 86.80 (10.20) | <0.001 |
| BMI (kg/m2) | 24.15 (3.32) | 25.07 (3.53) | <0.001 | 23.45 (3.35) | 25.05 (4.05) | <0.001 |
| Systolic blood pressure (mmHg) | 132.87 (18.15) | 144.98 (18.80) | <0.001 | 129.20 (34.77) | 145.55 (21.71) | <0.001 |
| Diastolic blood pressure (mmHg) | 83.03 (11.00) | 86.82 (12.04) | <0.001 | 78.84 (10.46) | 84.04 (11.60) | <0.001 |
| Fasting plasma glucose, mmol/L | 5.16 (1.18) | 5.95 (2.24) | <0.001 | 5.06 (0.96) | 5.84 (1.85) | <0.001 |
| Triglyceride, mmol/L | 1.69 (1.09) | 1.96 (1.23) | <0.001 | 1.38 (0.78) | 1.74 (0.99) | <0.001 |
| HDL-C, mmol/L | 1.37 (0.29) | 1.36 (0.35) | 0.62 | 1.60 (0.32) | 1.53 (0.34) | <0.001 |
| LDL-C, mmol/L | 3.11 (0.90) | 3.23 (1.00) | 0.13 | 3.20 (0.91) | 3.45 (0.98) | <0.001 |
| VLDL-c mmol/L | 0.76 (0.47) | 0.89 (0.56) | 0.005 | 0.62 (0.35) | 0.78 (0.44) | <0.001 |
| Total cholesterol, mmol/L | 5.25 (0.99) | 5.48 (1.11) | <0.01 | 5.43 (1.06) | 5.76 (1.12) | <0.001 |
| hypersensitive C-reactive protein, mmol/L | 1.24 (0.55,2.57) | 1.86 (0.82, 3.43) | <0.001 | 1.18(0.40,2.26) | 1.94(0.89,3.81) | <0.001 |
| eGFR (mL/min/1.73 m2) | 88.59 (16.95) | 73,49 (26.76) | <0.001 | 100.97 (19.89) | 85.69 (25.12) | <0.001 |
| ACR (mg/g) | 7.42 (4.77,11.35) | 44.88(30.48,87.47) | <0.001 | 9.77 (6.71,14.67) | 48.60 (34.99,90.83) | <0.001 |
| LAPI (cm ·mmol/L) | 40.42 (33.90) | 53.73 (41.80) | <0.001 | 34.27 (27.33) | 52.40 (36.76) | <0.001 |
| VAI | 1.38 (0.88,2.14) | 1.67 (1.11,2.55) | <0.001 | 1.38 (0.94,2.17) | 2.00 (1.19,3.04) | <0.001 |
| TyG | 8.68 (0.59) | 8.94 (0.63) | <0.001 | 8.49 (0.54) | 8.83 (0.60) | <0.001 |
Abbreviations: VAI, visceral adiposity index; LAPI, lipid accumulation product index; TyG, product of triacylglycerol and glucose; eGFR, the estimated glomerular filtration rate; ACR, urinary albumin-to-creatinine ratio.
Multivariate Logistic Regression Analysis Showing Independent Predictors of CKD
| Indices | Males | Females | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Model 1 | Model 2 | Model 1 | Model 2 | |||||
| OR (95% CI) | P | OR (95% CI) | P | OR (95% CI) | P | OR (95% CI) | P | |
| LAPI | ||||||||
| Q1(reference) | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | ||||
| Q2 | 1.02(0.58–1.79) | 0.930 | 0.85(0.44–1.66) | 0.649 | 0.96(0.59–1.57) | 0.895 | 0.65(0.37–1.14) | 0.135 |
| Q3 | 1.73(1.03–2.90) | 0.037 | 1.25(0.56–2.78) | 0.581 | 1.22(0.77–1.94) | 0.383 | 0.63(0.32–1.23) | 0.178 |
| Q4 | 2.87(1.73–4.74) | <0.001 | 1.81(0.62–5.24) | 0.272 | 2.45(1.57–3.81) | <0.001 | 0.86(0.34–2.19) | 0.764 |
| P for trend | <0.001 | 0.188 | <0.001 | 0.700 | ||||
| TyG | ||||||||
| Q1(reference) | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | ||||
| Q2 | 1.85(0.97–3.52) | 0.060 | 1.76(0.89–3.46) | 0.102 | 1.56(0.95–2.56) | 0.750 | 1.37(0.81–2.31) | 0.241 |
| Q3 | 2.07(1.12–3.80) | 0.019 | 1.90(0.96–3.76) | 0.065 | 1.90(1.17–3.07) | 0.009 | 1.62(0.92–2.85) | 0.094 |
| Q4 | 3.65(2.04–6.52) | <0.001 | 2.81(1.25–6.30) | 0.012 | 3.50(2.20–5.56) | <0.001 | 3.22(1.56–6.61) | 0.001 |
| P for trend | <0.001 | 0.018 | <0.001 | 0.003 | ||||
| VAI | ||||||||
| Q1(reference) | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | ||||
| Q2 | 1.40(0.81–2.40) | 0.224 | 1.31(0.71–2.49) | 0.371 | 0.82(0.49–1.35) | 0.442 | 0.64(0.36–1.12) | 0.123 |
| Q3 | 2.20(1.33–3.62) | 0.002 | 1.92(0.95–3.86) | 0.067 | 1.49(0.94–2.37) | 0.089 | 0.95(0.51–1.76) | 0.872 |
| Q4 | 2.50(1.51–4.14) | <0.001 | 2.01(0.75–5.36) | 0.164 | 2.13(1.37–3.32) | 0.001 | 1.11(0.49–2.52) | 0.797 |
| P for trend | <0.001 | 0.089 | <0.001 | 0.473 | ||||
Note: Model1 adjust for age, education, physical activity, smoking, drinking. Model2 adjust for age, education, physical activity, smoking, drinking, BMI, waist circumference, systolic pressure, diastolic pressure, high-sensitivity C reactive protein, VLDL-C, LDL-C, HDL-C, TC.
Abbreviations: VAI, visceral adiposity index; LAPI, lipid accumulation product index; TyG, product of triacylglycerol and glucose; CKD, chronic kidney disease.
The Areas Under ROC Curve (AUC), Sensitivity and Specificity by the Optimized Cut-off Points for Novel Indices in Predicting CKD
| Risk Factors | AUC | Cut-Off Value | Youden’ Index | Sensitivity | Specificity |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Male | |||||
| VAI | 0.586 (0.539–0.632) | 1.21 | 0.163 | 0.729 | 0.434 |
| TyG | 0.618 (0.572–0.664) | 8.74 | 0.182 | 0.594 | 0.588 |
| LAPI | 0.607 (0.560–0.654) | 36.83 | 0.211 | 0.635 | 0.576 |
| United predicted Model 1 | 0.753 (0.713–0.792) | 0.22 | 0.398 | 0.598 | 0.800 |
| Female | |||||
| VAI | 0.636 (0.600–0.673) | 1.88 | 0.228 | 0.541 | 0.686 |
| TyG | 0.670 (0.636–0.705) | 8.59 | 0.275 | 0.654 | 0.621 |
| LAPI | 0.670 (0.634–0.705) | 37.49 | 0.274 | 0.598 | 0.676 |
| United predicted Model 2 | 0.773 (0.741–0.806) | 0.17 | 0.451 | 0.720 | 0.732 |
Notes: United predicted model 1 includes age, systolic pressure, high-sensitivity C reactive protein, TyG. United predicted model 2 includes age, diastolic pressure, VLDL-C, high-sensitivity C reactive protein, TyG.
Abbreviations: VAI, visceral adiposity index; LAPI, lipid accumulation product index; TyG, product of triacylglycerol and glucose; CKD, chronic kidney disease; AUC, area under the ROC (receiver operating characteristic) curve.
Figure 1ROC curve analysis of the value of TyG, LAPI, VAI, united predicted model for predicting CKD in males.
Figure 2ROC curve analysis of the value of TyG, LAPI, VAI, united predicted model for predicting CKD in females.