Literature DB >> 33328142

Evaluation of the safety profile of the vaccine candidate Brucella melitensis 16MΔvjbR strain in goats.

M Raquel Castaño-Zubieta1, Carlos A Rossetti1, Daniel G García-González2, Estefanía Maurizio3, Martha E Hensel2, Allison C Rice-Ficht4, Thomas A Ficht2, Ángela M Arenas-Gamboa5.   

Abstract

Small ruminant brucellosis is caused by the Gram negative cocci-bacillus Brucella (B.) melitensis, the most virulent Brucella species for humans. In goats and sheep, middle to late-term gestation abortion, stillbirths and the delivery of weak infected offspring are the characteristic clinical signs of the disease. Vaccination with the currently available Rev. 1 vaccine is the best option to prevent and control the disease, although it is far from ideal. In this study, we investigate the safety of the B. melitensis 16MΔvjbR strain during a 15-month period beginning at vaccination of young goats, impregnation, delivery and lactation. Forty, 4 to 6 months old, healthy female crossbreed goats were randomly divided into four groups (n = 10) and immunized subcutaneously with a single vaccine dose containing 1x109 CFU of B. melitensis 16MΔvjbR delivered in alginate microcapsules or non-encapsulated. Controls received empty capsules or the commercially available Rev.1 vaccine. Seven months post-vaccination, when animals were sexually mature, all goats were naturally bred using brucellosis-free males, and allowed to carry pregnancies to term. Blood samples to assess the humoral immune response were collected throughout the study. At two months post-delivery, all dams and their offspring were euthanized and a necropsy was performed to collect samples for bacteriology and histology. Interestingly, none of the animals that received the vaccine candidate regardless of the formulation exhibited any clinical signs associated with vaccination nor shed the vaccine strain through saliva, vagina or the milk. Gross and histopathologic changes in all nannies and offspring were unremarkable with no evidence of tissue colonization or vertical transmission to fetuses. Altogether, these data demonstrate that vaccination with the mutant strain 16MΔvjbR is safe for use in the non-pregnant primary host.
Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Brucella; Brucellosis; Goats; Microencapsulation; Vaccine

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 33328142      PMCID: PMC8730362          DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2020.11.033

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vaccine        ISSN: 0264-410X            Impact factor:   3.641


  23 in total

1.  Extended safety and efficacy studies of the attenuated Brucella vaccine candidates 16 M(Delta)vjbR and S19(Delta)vjbR in the immunocompromised IRF-1-/- mouse model.

Authors:  A M Arenas-Gamboa; A C Rice-Ficht; Y Fan; M M Kahl-McDonagh; T A Ficht
Journal:  Clin Vaccine Immunol       Date:  2011-12-14

2.  Conjunctival vaccination of pregnant ewes and goats with Brucella melitensis Rev 1 vaccine: safety and serological responses.

Authors:  E Zundel; J M Verger; M Grayon; R Michel
Journal:  Ann Rech Vet       Date:  1992

3.  Immunization with a single dose of a microencapsulated Brucella melitensis mutant enhances protection against wild-type challenge.

Authors:  Angela M Arenas-Gamboa; Thomas A Ficht; Melissa M Kahl-McDonagh; Allison C Rice-Ficht
Journal:  Infect Immun       Date:  2008-03-24       Impact factor: 3.441

Review 4.  An evolutionary strategy for a stealthy intracellular Brucella pathogen.

Authors:  Anna Martirosyan; Edgardo Moreno; Jean-Pierre Gorvel
Journal:  Immunol Rev       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 12.988

5.  Numbers of Brucella abortus in the placenta, umbilicus and fetal fluid of two naturally infected cows.

Authors:  B Alexander; P R Schnurrenberger; R R Brown
Journal:  Vet Rec       Date:  1981-06-06       Impact factor: 2.695

6.  B cell-deficient mice display markedly enhanced resistance to the intracellular bacterium Brucella abortus.

Authors:  Radhika Goenka; Michelle A Parent; Philip H Elzer; Cynthia L Baldwin
Journal:  J Infect Dis       Date:  2011-04-15       Impact factor: 5.226

7.  Development and evaluation of in murine model, of an improved live-vaccine candidate against brucellosis from to Brucella melitensis vjbR deletion mutant.

Authors:  Zhiqiang Li; Shuli Wang; Hui Zhang; Li Xi; Jinliang Zhang; Xiaogen Zhang; Qingfeng Zhou; Jihai Yi; Min Li; Weihua Zhang; Junbo Zhang
Journal:  Microb Pathog       Date:  2018-08-25       Impact factor: 3.738

8.  The Brucella abortus S19 DeltavjbR live vaccine candidate is safer than S19 and confers protection against wild-type challenge in BALB/c mice when delivered in a sustained-release vehicle.

Authors:  A M Arenas-Gamboa; T A Ficht; M M Kahl-McDonagh; G Gomez; A C Rice-Ficht
Journal:  Infect Immun       Date:  2008-12-01       Impact factor: 3.441

9.  Immune Response of Calves Vaccinated with Brucella abortus S19 or RB51 and Revaccinated with RB51.

Authors:  Elaine M S Dorneles; Graciela K Lima; Andréa Teixeira-Carvalho; Márcio S S Araújo; Olindo A Martins-Filho; Nammalwar Sriranganathan; Hamzeh Al Qublan; Marcos B Heinemann; Andrey P Lage
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-09-09       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 10.  Caprine brucellosis: A historically neglected disease with significant impact on public health.

Authors:  Carlos A Rossetti; Angela M Arenas-Gamboa; Estefanía Maurizio
Journal:  PLoS Negl Trop Dis       Date:  2017-08-17
View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  Comparative Review of Brucellosis in Small Domestic Ruminants.

Authors:  Carlos Alberto Rossetti; Estefanía Maurizio; Ursula Amaranta Rossi
Journal:  Front Vet Sci       Date:  2022-05-12

2.  Facing the Human and Animal Brucellosis Conundrums: The Forgotten Lessons.

Authors:  Edgardo Moreno; José-María Blasco; Ignacio Moriyón
Journal:  Microorganisms       Date:  2022-04-30
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.