T Luo1, J W Zhang1, Y Zhu1, X H Jia1, Y J Dong2, W W Zhan1, J Q Zhou3. 1. Department of Ultrasound, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai 200025, China. 2. Department of Ultrasound, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai 200025, China. Electronic address: dongyiyin@126.com. 3. Department of Ultrasound, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai 200025, China. Electronic address: zhousu30@126.com.
Abstract
AIM: To investigate the value of the qualitative and quantitative features of Virtual Touch imaging quantification (VTIQ) shear-wave elastography in the characterisation of breast lesions. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Conventional ultrasound (US) and VTIQ were performed in 148 solid breast lesions in 148 women. During qualitative analysis, patterns of VTIQ were categorised into two patterns, 1 and 2. During quantitative analysis, the mean SWV (SWVmean) and the maximum SWV (SWVmax) of each lesion were used. The sensitivity, specificity, and the areas under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve (Az value) were calculated for conventional US, VTIQ, and combined conventional US and VTIQ. RESULTS: Malignant lesions were more likely to show VTIQ pattern 2 than the benign lesions (p<0.001). There was no significant difference in the Az values between SWVmean (0.907) and SWVmax (0.902; p=0.572). There was no significant difference in the Az values between the VTIQ pattern (0.884) and SWVmax (p=0.572). The combined conventional US and VTIQ pattern carried a similar Az value (0.949) as compared with the combined conventional US and SWVmax, which yielded an Az value of 0.952 (p=0.683). CONCLUSION: The combination of either VTIQ pattern or SWVmax and conventional US may be helpful in the characterisation of benign and malignant breast lesions.
AIM: To investigate the value of the qualitative and quantitative features of Virtual Touch imaging quantification (VTIQ) shear-wave elastography in the characterisation of breast lesions. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Conventional ultrasound (US) and VTIQ were performed in 148 solid breast lesions in 148 women. During qualitative analysis, patterns of VTIQ were categorised into two patterns, 1 and 2. During quantitative analysis, the mean SWV (SWVmean) and the maximum SWV (SWVmax) of each lesion were used. The sensitivity, specificity, and the areas under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve (Az value) were calculated for conventional US, VTIQ, and combined conventional US and VTIQ. RESULTS:Malignant lesions were more likely to show VTIQ pattern 2 than the benign lesions (p<0.001). There was no significant difference in the Az values between SWVmean (0.907) and SWVmax (0.902; p=0.572). There was no significant difference in the Az values between the VTIQ pattern (0.884) and SWVmax (p=0.572). The combined conventional US and VTIQ pattern carried a similar Az value (0.949) as compared with the combined conventional US and SWVmax, which yielded an Az value of 0.952 (p=0.683). CONCLUSION: The combination of either VTIQ pattern or SWVmax and conventional US may be helpful in the characterisation of benign and malignant breast lesions.