OBJECTIVE: To study the application value of whole exome sequencing (WES) in critically ill neonates with inherited diseases. METHODS: A total of 66 critically ill neonates with suspected inherited diseases or unclear clinical diagnosis who were admitted to the neonatal intensive care unit were enrolled as subjects. The clinical data of the neonates were collected, and venous blood samples were collected from the neonates and their parents for WES. The clinical manifestations of the neonates were observed to search for related pathogenic gene mutations. RESULTS: Among the 66 critically ill neonates with suspected inherited diseases or unclear clinical diagnosis (34 boys and 32 girls), 14 (21%) were found to have gene mutations by WES. One neonate had no gene mutation detected by WES but was highly suspected of pigment incontinence based on clinical manifestations, and multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification detected a heterozygous deletion mutation in exons 4-10 of the IKBKG gene. Among the 15 neonates with gene mutations, 10 (67%) had pathogenic gene mutation, 1 (7%) was suspected of pathogenic gene mutation, and 4 (27%) had gene mutations with unknown significance. Among the 15 neonates, 13 underwent chromosome examination, and only 1 neonate was found to have chromosome abnormality. CONCLUSIONS: Chromosome examination cannot be used as a diagnostic method for inherited diseases, and WES detection technology is an important tool to find inherited diseases in critically ill neonates with suspected inherited diseases or unclear clinical diagnosis; however WES technology has some limitation and it is thus necessary to combine with other sequencing methods to achieve an early diagnosis.
OBJECTIVE: To study the application value of whole exome sequencing (WES) in critically ill neonates with inherited diseases. METHODS: A total of 66 critically ill neonates with suspected inherited diseases or unclear clinical diagnosis who were admitted to the neonatal intensive care unit were enrolled as subjects. The clinical data of the neonates were collected, and venous blood samples were collected from the neonates and their parents for WES. The clinical manifestations of the neonates were observed to search for related pathogenic gene mutations. RESULTS: Among the 66 critically ill neonates with suspected inherited diseases or unclear clinical diagnosis (34 boys and 32 girls), 14 (21%) were found to have gene mutations by WES. One neonate had no gene mutation detected by WES but was highly suspected of pigment incontinence based on clinical manifestations, and multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification detected a heterozygous deletion mutation in exons 4-10 of the IKBKG gene. Among the 15 neonates with gene mutations, 10 (67%) had pathogenic gene mutation, 1 (7%) was suspected of pathogenic gene mutation, and 4 (27%) had gene mutations with unknown significance. Among the 15 neonates, 13 underwent chromosome examination, and only 1 neonate was found to have chromosome abnormality. CONCLUSIONS: Chromosome examination cannot be used as a diagnostic method for inherited diseases, and WES detection technology is an important tool to find inherited diseases in critically ill neonates with suspected inherited diseases or unclear clinical diagnosis; however WES technology has some limitation and it is thus necessary to combine with other sequencing methods to achieve an early diagnosis.
Authors: Zhi-Ye Qi; Jiang Duan; Xiang-Ying He; Qing-Hua Zhong; Cai-Ying Zhang; Yun-Bo Xie; Kun Liang Journal: Zhongguo Dang Dai Er Ke Za Zhi Date: 2019-07
Authors: Murim Choi; Ute I Scholl; Weizhen Ji; Tiewen Liu; Irina R Tikhonova; Paul Zumbo; Ahmet Nayir; Ayşin Bakkaloğlu; Seza Ozen; Sami Sanjad; Carol Nelson-Williams; Anita Farhi; Shrikant Mane; Richard P Lifton Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2009-10-27 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Linyan Meng; Mohan Pammi; Anirudh Saronwala; Pilar Magoulas; Andrew Ray Ghazi; Francesco Vetrini; Jing Zhang; Weimin He; Avinash V Dharmadhikari; Chunjing Qu; Patricia Ward; Alicia Braxton; Swetha Narayanan; Xiaoyan Ge; Mari J Tokita; Teresa Santiago-Sim; Hongzheng Dai; Theodore Chiang; Hadley Smith; Mahshid S Azamian; Laurie Robak; Bret L Bostwick; Christian P Schaaf; Lorraine Potocki; Fernando Scaglia; Carlos A Bacino; Neil A Hanchard; Michael F Wangler; Daryl Scott; Chester Brown; Jianhong Hu; John W Belmont; Lindsay C Burrage; Brett H Graham; Vernon Reid Sutton; William J Craigen; Sharon E Plon; James R Lupski; Arthur L Beaudet; Richard A Gibbs; Donna M Muzny; Marcus J Miller; Xia Wang; Magalie S Leduc; Rui Xiao; Pengfei Liu; Chad Shaw; Magdalena Walkiewicz; Weimin Bi; Fan Xia; Brendan Lee; Christine M Eng; Yaping Yang; Seema R Lalani Journal: JAMA Pediatr Date: 2017-12-04 Impact factor: 16.193
Authors: Neil A Miller; Emily G Farrow; Margaret Gibson; Laurel K Willig; Greyson Twist; Byunggil Yoo; Tyler Marrs; Shane Corder; Lisa Krivohlavek; Adam Walter; Josh E Petrikin; Carol J Saunders; Isabelle Thiffault; Sarah E Soden; Laurie D Smith; Darrell L Dinwiddie; Suzanne Herd; Julie A Cakici; Severine Catreux; Mike Ruehle; Stephen F Kingsmore Journal: Genome Med Date: 2015-09-30 Impact factor: 11.117
Authors: Anath C Lionel; Gregory Costain; Nasim Monfared; Susan Walker; Miriam S Reuter; S Mohsen Hosseini; Bhooma Thiruvahindrapuram; Daniele Merico; Rebekah Jobling; Thomas Nalpathamkalam; Giovanna Pellecchia; Wilson W L Sung; Zhuozhi Wang; Peter Bikangaga; Cyrus Boelman; Melissa T Carter; Dawn Cordeiro; Cheryl Cytrynbaum; Sharon D Dell; Priya Dhir; James J Dowling; Elise Heon; Stacy Hewson; Linda Hiraki; Michal Inbar-Feigenberg; Regan Klatt; Jonathan Kronick; Ronald M Laxer; Christoph Licht; Heather MacDonald; Saadet Mercimek-Andrews; Roberto Mendoza-Londono; Tino Piscione; Rayfel Schneider; Andreas Schulze; Earl Silverman; Komudi Siriwardena; O Carter Snead; Neal Sondheimer; Joanne Sutherland; Ajoy Vincent; Jonathan D Wasserman; Rosanna Weksberg; Cheryl Shuman; Chris Carew; Michael J Szego; Robin Z Hayeems; Raveen Basran; Dimitri J Stavropoulos; Peter N Ray; Sarah Bowdin; M Stephen Meyn; Ronald D Cohn; Stephen W Scherer; Christian R Marshall Journal: Genet Med Date: 2017-08-03 Impact factor: 8.822