| Literature DB >> 33327954 |
Manon Egnell1, Zenobia Talati2, Pilar Galan3, Valentina A Andreeva3, Stefanie Vandevijvere4, Marion Gombaud3, Louise Dréano-Trécant3, Serge Hercberg3,5, Simone Pettigrew6, Chantal Julia3,5.
Abstract
Entities:
Year: 2020 PMID: 33327954 PMCID: PMC7745501 DOI: 10.1186/s12966-020-01069-5
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act ISSN: 1479-5868 Impact factor: 6.457
Fig. 3Changes in ability to correctly rank products between the FoPL and no-FoPL labelling conditions, compared to the Reference Intakes label, * Significant results (p-value≤0.05) after False Discovery Rate correction for multiple testing modifying the p-value. The reference of the multivariate ordinal logistic regression for the categorical variable ‘FoPL’ was the Reference Intakes label. The multivariate model was adjusted on sex, age, educational level, level of income, responsibility for grocery shopping, self-estimated diet quality, and self-estimated nutrition knowledge level. FoPL: Front-of-Pack nutrition Label