Lingrui Liu1,2, Mayur M Desai1,3, Netsanet Fetene1, Temsgen Ayehu4, Kidest Nadew1, Erika Linnander1,2. 1. Global Health Leadership Initiative, Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA. 2. Department of Health Policy and Management, Yale School of Public Health, New Haven, CT, USA. 3. Department of Chronic Disease Epidemiology, Yale School of Public Health, New Haven, CT, USA. 4. Federal Ministry of Health, Government of Ethiopia, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Despite a wide range of interventions to improve district health management capacity in low-income settings, evidence of the impact of these investments on system-wide management capacity and primary healthcare systems performance is limited. To address this gap, we conducted a longitudinal study of the 36 rural districts (woredas), including 229 health centers, participating in the Primary Healthcare Transformation Initiative (PTI) in Ethiopia. METHODS: Between 2015 and 2017, we collected quantitative measures of management capacity at the district and health center levels and a primary healthcare key performance indicator (KPI) summary score based on antenatal care (ANC) coverage, contraception use, skilled birth attendance, infant immunization, and availability of essential medications. We conducted repeated measures analysis of variance (ANOVA) to assess (1) changes in management capacities at the district health office level and health center level, (2) changes in health systems performance, and (3) the differential effects of more vs less intensive intervention models. RESULTS: Adherence to management standards at both district and health center levels improved during the intervention, and the most prominent improvement was achieved during district managers' exposure to intensive mentorship and education. We did not observe similar patterns of change in KPI summary score. CONCLUSION: The district health office is a valuable entry point for primary healthcare reform, and district- and facility-level management capacity can be measured and improved in a relatively short period of time. A combination of intensive mentorship and structured team-based education can serve as both an accelerator for change and a mechanism to inform broader reform efforts.
BACKGROUND: Despite a wide range of interventions to improve district health management capacity in low-income settings, evidence of the impact of these investments on system-wide management capacity and primary healthcare systems performance is limited. To address this gap, we conducted a longitudinal study of the 36 rural districts (woredas), including 229 health centers, participating in the Primary Healthcare Transformation Initiative (PTI) in Ethiopia. METHODS: Between 2015 and 2017, we collected quantitative measures of management capacity at the district and health center levels and a primary healthcare key performance indicator (KPI) summary score based on antenatal care (ANC) coverage, contraception use, skilled birth attendance, infant immunization, and availability of essential medications. We conducted repeated measures analysis of variance (ANOVA) to assess (1) changes in management capacities at the district health office level and health center level, (2) changes in health systems performance, and (3) the differential effects of more vs less intensive intervention models. RESULTS: Adherence to management standards at both district and health center levels improved during the intervention, and the most prominent improvement was achieved during district managers' exposure to intensive mentorship and education. We did not observe similar patterns of change in KPI summary score. CONCLUSION: The district health office is a valuable entry point for primary healthcare reform, and district- and facility-level management capacity can be measured and improved in a relatively short period of time. A combination of intensive mentorship and structured team-based education can serve as both an accelerator for change and a mechanism to inform broader reform efforts.