Literature DB >> 33326888

3D bioprinting of graphene oxide-incorporated cell-laden bone mimicking scaffolds for promoting scaffold fidelity, osteogenic differentiation and mineralization.

Jianhua Zhang1, Hande Eyisoylu1, Xiao-Hua Qin1, Marina Rubert1, Ralph Müller2.   

Abstract

Bioprinting is a promising technique for facilitating the fabrication of engineered bone tissues for patient-specific defect repair and for developing in vitro tissue/organ models for ex vivo tests. However, polymer-based ink materials often result in insufficient mechanical strength, low scaffold fidelity and loss of osteogenesis induction because of the intrinsic swelling/shrinking and bioinert properties of most polymeric hydrogels. Here, we developed a human mesenchymal stem cells (hMSCs)-laden graphene oxide (GO)/alginate/gelatin composite bioink to form 3D bone-mimicking scaffolds using a 3D bioprinting technique. Our results showed that the GO composite bioinks (0.5GO, 1GO, 2GO) with higher GO concentrations (0.5, 1 and 2 mg/ml) improved the bioprintability, scaffold fidelity, compressive modulus and cell viability at day 1. The higher GO concentration increased the cell body size and DNA content, but the 2GO group swelled and had the lowest compressive modulus at day 42. The 1GO group had the highest osteogenic differentiation of hMSC with the upregulation of osteogenic-related gene (ALPL, BGLAP, PHEX) expression. To mimic critical-sized calvarial bone defects in mice and prove scaffold fidelity, 3D cell-laden GO defect scaffolds with complex geometries were successfully bioprinted. 1GO maintained the best scaffold fidelity and had the highest mineral volume after culturing in the bioreactor for 42 days. In conclusion, GO composite bioinks had better bioprintability, scaffold fidelity, cell proliferation, osteogenic differentiation and ECM mineralization than the pure alginate/gelatin system. The optimal GO group was 1GO, which demonstrated the potential for 3D bioprinting of bone tissue models and tissue engineering applications.
Copyright © 2020. Published by Elsevier Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  3D bioprinting; ECM mineralization; Graphene oxide; Osteogenic differentiation; Scaffold fidelity

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 33326888     DOI: 10.1016/j.actbio.2020.12.026

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Biomater        ISSN: 1742-7061            Impact factor:   8.947


  16 in total

Review 1.  Systematic review on the application of 3D-bioprinting technology in orthoregeneration: current achievements and open challenges.

Authors:  Rachel L Pan; Kari Martyniak; Makan Karimzadeh; David G Gelikman; Jonathan DeVries; Kelly Sutter; Melanie Coathup; Mehdi Razavi; Rajendra Sawh-Martinez; Thomas J Kean
Journal:  J Exp Orthop       Date:  2022-09-19

2.  3D printing of bio-instructive materials: Toward directing the cell.

Authors:  Piotr Stanisław Zieliński; Pavan Kumar Reddy Gudeti; Timo Rikmanspoel; Małgorzata Katarzyna Włodarczyk-Biegun
Journal:  Bioact Mater       Date:  2022-04-23

Review 3.  An Overview of Extracellular Matrix-Based Bioinks for 3D Bioprinting.

Authors:  Haonan Wang; Huaqing Yu; Xia Zhou; Jilong Zhang; Hongrui Zhou; Haitong Hao; Lina Ding; Huiying Li; Yanru Gu; Junchi Ma; Jianfeng Qiu; Depeng Ma
Journal:  Front Bioeng Biotechnol       Date:  2022-05-11

Review 4.  A Review of Recent Advances in Natural Polymer-Based Scaffolds for Musculoskeletal Tissue Engineering.

Authors:  Jingzhi Fan; Keyvan Abedi-Dorcheh; Asma Sadat Vaziri; Fereshteh Kazemi-Aghdam; Saeed Rafieyan; Masoume Sohrabinejad; Mina Ghorbani; Fatemeh Rastegar Adib; Zahra Ghasemi; Kristaps Klavins; Vahid Jahed
Journal:  Polymers (Basel)       Date:  2022-05-20       Impact factor: 4.967

Review 5.  Advances in Use of Nanomaterials for Musculoskeletal Regeneration.

Authors:  Josef Jampilek; Daniela Placha
Journal:  Pharmaceutics       Date:  2021-11-24       Impact factor: 6.321

6.  Genetic profiling of human bone marrow and adipose tissue-derived mesenchymal stem cells reveals differences in osteogenic signaling mediated by graphene.

Authors:  Amber F MacDonald; Ruby D Trotter; Christopher D Griffin; Austin J Bow; Steven D Newby; William J King; Lisa L Amelse; Thomas J Masi; Shawn E Bourdo; Madhu S Dhar
Journal:  J Nanobiotechnology       Date:  2021-09-22       Impact factor: 10.435

7.  Extrusion-Based Bioprinted Boron Nitride Nanotubes Reinforced Alginate Scaffolds: Mechanical, Printability and Cell Viability Evaluation.

Authors:  Akesh Babu Kakarla; Ing Kong; Cin Kong; Helen Irving
Journal:  Polymers (Basel)       Date:  2022-01-26       Impact factor: 4.329

Review 8.  Graphene Oxide and Biomolecules for the Production of Functional 3D Graphene-Based Materials.

Authors:  Paolo Passaretti
Journal:  Front Mol Biosci       Date:  2022-03-15

Review 9.  Bioactive Inks Development for Osteochondral Tissue Engineering: A Mini-Review.

Authors:  Negar Bakhtiary; Chaozong Liu; Farnaz Ghorbani
Journal:  Gels       Date:  2021-12-18

10.  Silicate-Based Electro-Conductive Inks for Printing Soft Electronics and Tissue Engineering.

Authors:  Sadaf Samimi Gharaie; Amir Seyfoori; Bardia Khun Jush; Xiong Zhou; Erik Pagan; Brent Godau; Mohsen Akbari
Journal:  Gels       Date:  2021-11-27
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.