Literature DB >> 33326361

During vigilance to painful stimuli: slower response rate is related to high trait anxiety, whereas faster response rate is related to high state anxiety.

Timothy J Meeker1, Nichole M Emerson1, Jui-Hong Chien1, Mark I Saffer1, Oscar Joseph Bienvenu2, Anna Korzeniewska3, Joel D Greenspan1,4, Frederick Arthur Lenz1.   

Abstract

A pathological increase in vigilance, or hypervigilance, may be related to pain intensity in some clinical pain syndromes and may result from attention bias to salient stimuli mediated by anxiety. During a continuous performance task where subjects discriminated painful target stimuli from painful nontargets, we measured detected targets (hits), nondetected targets (misses), nondetected nontargets (correct rejections), and detected nontargets (false alarms). Using signal detection theory, we calculated response bias, the tendency to endorse a stimulus as a target, and discriminability, the ability to discriminate a target from nontarget. Owing to the relatively slow rate of stimulus presentation, our primary hypothesis was that sustained performance would result in a more conservative response bias reflecting a lower response rate over time on task. We found a more conservative response bias with time on task and no change in discriminability. We predicted that greater state and trait anxiety would lead to a more liberal response bias. A multivariable model provided partial support for our prediction; high trait anxiety related to a more conservative response bias (lower response rate), whereas high state anxiety related to a more liberal bias. This inverse relationship of state and trait anxiety is consistent with reports of effects of state and trait anxiety on reaction times to threatening stimuli. In sum, we report that sustained attention to painful stimuli was associated with a decrease in the tendency of the subject to respond to any stimulus over time on task, whereas the ability to discriminate target from nontarget remains unchanged.NEW & NOTEWORTHY During a series of painful stimuli requiring subjects to respond to targets, we separated response willingness from ability to discriminate targets from nontargets. Response willingness declined during the task, with no change in subjects' ability to discriminate, consistent with previous vigilance studies. High trait anxious subjects were less willing to respond and showed slower reaction times to hits than low anxious subjects. This study reveals an important role of trait anxiety in pain vigilance.

Entities:  

Keywords:  pain; signal detection theory; state anxiety; trait anxiety; vigilance

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 33326361      PMCID: PMC8087378          DOI: 10.1152/jn.00492.2020

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.714


  88 in total

1.  Time-course of attention for threatening pictures in high and low trait anxiety.

Authors:  Ernst H W Koster; Bruno Verschuere; Geert Crombez; Stefaan Van Damme
Journal:  Behav Res Ther       Date:  2005-08

Review 2.  Vigilance requires hard mental work and is stressful.

Authors:  Joel S Warm; Raja Parasuraman; Gerald Matthews
Journal:  Hum Factors       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 2.888

Review 3.  A review of current evidence for the causal impact of attentional bias on fear and anxiety.

Authors:  Bram Van Bockstaele; Bruno Verschuere; Helen Tibboel; Jan De Houwer; Geert Crombez; Ernst H W Koster
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  2013-11-04       Impact factor: 17.737

4.  Random effects structure for confirmatory hypothesis testing: Keep it maximal.

Authors:  Dale J Barr; Roger Levy; Christoph Scheepers; Harry J Tily
Journal:  J Mem Lang       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 3.059

Review 5.  Signal detection theory measurement of pain: a review and critique.

Authors:  Gary B Rollman
Journal:  Pain       Date:  1977-06       Impact factor: 6.961

6.  Factor analytic and reliability studies on the Activation-Deactivation Adjective Check List.

Authors:  R E Thayer
Journal:  Psychol Rep       Date:  1978-06

7.  Atypical modulation of startle in women in face of aversive bodily sensations.

Authors:  Erik Ceunen; Johan W S Vlaeyen; Ilse Van Diest
Journal:  Int J Psychophysiol       Date:  2013-03-27       Impact factor: 2.997

8.  Neuronal Modulations in Visual Cortex Are Associated with Only One of Multiple Components of Attention.

Authors:  Thomas Zhihao Luo; John H R Maunsell
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2015-06-03       Impact factor: 17.173

9.  Opiate pharmacology and individual differences. I. Psychophysical pain measurements.

Authors:  M S Buchsbaum; G C Davis; R Coppola; D Naber
Journal:  Pain       Date:  1981-06       Impact factor: 6.961

Review 10.  Fear and the Defense Cascade: Clinical Implications and Management.

Authors:  Kasia Kozlowska; Peter Walker; Loyola McLean; Pascal Carrive
Journal:  Harv Rev Psychiatry       Date:  2015 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.732

View more
  1 in total

1.  Brain responses to painful electrical stimuli and cognitive tasks interact in the precuneus, posterior cingulate cortex, and inferior parietal cortex and do not vary across the menstrual cycle.

Authors:  Dieuwke S Veldhuijzen; Timothy J Meeker; Deborah Bauer; Michael L Keaser; Rao P Gullapalli; Joel D Greenspan
Journal:  Brain Behav       Date:  2022-05-05       Impact factor: 3.405

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.