Literature DB >> 33325948

A rational review on the effects of sweeteners and sweetness enhancers on appetite, food reward and metabolic/adiposity outcomes in adults.

Dominic O'Connor1, Michelle Pang, Gabriele Castelnuovo, Graham Finlayson, Ellen Blaak, Catherine Gibbons, Santiago Navas-Carretero, Eva Almiron-Roig, Jo Harrold, Anne Raben, J Alfredo Martinez.   

Abstract

Numerous strategies have been investigated to overcome the excessive weight gain that accompanies a chronic positive energy balance. Most approaches focus on a reduction of energy intake and the improvement of lifestyle habits. The use of high intensity artificial sweeteners, also known as non-caloric sweeteners (NCS), as sugar substitutes in foods and beverages, is rapidly developing. NCS are commonly defined as molecules with a sweetness profile of 30 times higher or more that of sucrose, scarcely contributing to the individual's net energy intake as they are hardly metabolized. The purpose of this review is first, to assess the impact of NCS on eating behaviour, including subjective appetite, food intake, food reward and sensory stimulation; and secondly, to assess the metabolic impact of NCS on body weight regulation, glucose homeostasis and gut health. The evidence reviewed suggests that while some sweeteners have the potential to increase subjective appetite, these effects do not translate in changes in food intake. This is supported by a large body of empirical evidence advocating that the use of NCS facilitates weight management when used alongside other weight management strategies. On the other hand, although NCS are very unlikely to impair insulin metabolism and glycaemic control, some studies suggest that NCS could have putatively undesirable effects, through various indirect mechanisms, on body weight, glycemia, adipogenesis and the gut microbiota; however there is insufficient evidence to determine the degree of such effects. Overall, the available data suggests that NCS can be used to facilitate a reduction in dietary energy content without significant negative effects on food intake behaviour or body metabolism, which would support their potential role in the prevention of obesity as a complementary strategy to other weight management approaches. More research is needed to determine the impact of NCS on metabolic health, in particular gut microbiota.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 33325948     DOI: 10.1039/d0fo02424d

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Food Funct        ISSN: 2042-6496            Impact factor:   5.396


  4 in total

1.  Association of sweetened beverages consumption with all-cause mortality risk among Dutch adults: the Lifelines Cohort Study (the SWEET project).

Authors:  Novita D Naomi; Elske M Brouwer-Brolsma; Marion E C Buso; Sabita S Soedamah-Muthu; Joanne A Harrold; Jason C G Halford; Anne Raben; Johanna M Geleijnse; Edith J M Feskens
Journal:  Eur J Nutr       Date:  2022-10-21       Impact factor: 4.865

2.  Low Dose of Sucralose Alter Gut Microbiome in Mice.

Authors:  Zibin Zheng; Yingping Xiao; Lingyan Ma; Wentao Lyu; Hao Peng; Xiaorong Wang; Ying Ren; Jinjun Li
Journal:  Front Nutr       Date:  2022-02-25

Review 3.  Nutritional strategies to attenuate postprandial glycemic response.

Authors:  Kenneth Pasmans; Ruth C R Meex; Luc J C van Loon; Ellen E Blaak
Journal:  Obes Rev       Date:  2022-06-10       Impact factor: 10.867

4.  Protocol for a multicentre, parallel, randomised, controlled trial on the effect of sweeteners and sweetness enhancers on health, obesity and safety in overweight adults and children: the SWEET project.

Authors:  Louise Kjølbæk; Yannis Manios; Ellen E Blaak; J Alfredo Martínez; Edith J M Feskens; Graham Finlayson; Sabina S H Andersen; Kyriakos Reppas; Santiago Navas-Carretero; Tanja C Adam; Charo E Hodgkins; Marta Del Álamo; Tony Lam; Hariklia Moshoyiannis; Jason C G Halford; Joanne A Harrold; Anne Raben
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2022-10-12       Impact factor: 3.006

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.