Literature DB >> 33324974

Point: Reconciling Epidemiology's Aspirations and Capabilities.

David A Savitz.   

Abstract

Interpreting the results of epidemiologic studies calls for objectivity and rigorous scrutiny, acknowledging the limitations that temper the applicability of the findings to public health action. Current trends have posed new challenges to balancing goals of scientific objectivity and validity with public health applications. The ongoing tension between epidemiology's aspirations and capability has several sources: the need to overpromise in research proposals, compromising methodological rigor because of public health importance, defending findings in the face of hostile critics, and appealing to core constituencies who have specific expectations from the research.
© The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Keywords:  applied epidemiology; epidemiologic methods; objective interpretation

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33324974      PMCID: PMC8921614          DOI: 10.1093/aje/kwaa271

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Epidemiol        ISSN: 0002-9262            Impact factor:   4.897


  10 in total

1.  An argument for a consequentialist epidemiology.

Authors:  Sandro Galea
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2013-09-10       Impact factor: 4.897

2.  Ambient Air Pollution and Mortality in 652 Cities.

Authors:  Daniel Hernandez-Vaquero; Sergio Rodriguez; Alberto Dominguez-Rodriguez
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2019-11-21       Impact factor: 91.245

3.  Air Pollution and Mortality in the Medicare Population.

Authors:  Qian Di; Francesca Dominici; Joel D Schwartz
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2017-10-12       Impact factor: 91.245

4.  Evidence for reducing cancer-specific mortality due to screening for breast cancer in Europe: A systematic review.

Authors:  Nadine Zielonke; Andrea Gini; Erik E L Jansen; Ahti Anttila; Nereo Segnan; Antonio Ponti; Piret Veerus; Harry J de Koning; Nicolien T van Ravesteyn; Eveline A M Heijnsdijk
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  2020-01-10       Impact factor: 9.162

5.  Exposure to glyphosate-based herbicides and risk for non-Hodgkin lymphoma: A meta-analysis and supporting evidence.

Authors:  Luoping Zhang; Iemaan Rana; Rachel M Shaffer; Emanuela Taioli; Lianne Sheppard
Journal:  Mutat Res Rev Mutat Res       Date:  2019-02-10       Impact factor: 5.657

Review 6.  The science of epidemiology and the methods needed for public health assessments: a review of epidemiology textbooks.

Authors:  Hebe N Gouda; John W Powles
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2014-02-10       Impact factor: 3.295

Review 7.  Is it time to reassess current safety standards for glyphosate-based herbicides?

Authors:  Laura N Vandenberg; Bruce Blumberg; Michael N Antoniou; Charles M Benbrook; Lynn Carroll; Theo Colborn; Lorne G Everett; Michael Hansen; Philip J Landrigan; Bruce P Lanphear; Robin Mesnage; Frederick S Vom Saal; Wade V Welshons; John Peterson Myers
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  2017-03-20       Impact factor: 3.710

8.  Triangulation in aetiological epidemiology.

Authors:  Debbie A Lawlor; Kate Tilling; George Davey Smith
Journal:  Int J Epidemiol       Date:  2016-12-01       Impact factor: 7.196

9.  Post-Modern Epidemiology: When Methods Meet Matter.

Authors:  George Davey Smith
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2019-08-01       Impact factor: 4.897

10.  Red and Processed Meats and Health Risks: How Strong Is the Evidence?

Authors:  Frank Qian; Matthew C Riddle; Judith Wylie-Rosett; Frank B Hu
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2020-02       Impact factor: 19.112

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.