Literature DB >> 33324872

GCS 15: when mild TBI isn't so mild.

Latha Ganti1,2, Tej Stead3, Yasamin Daneshvar4, Aakash N Bodhit5, Christa Pulvino6, Sarah W Ayala7, Keith R Peters8.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The present study characterizes patients with the mildest of mild traumatic brain injury (TBI), as defined by a Glasgow coma score (GCS) of 15.
METHODS: This is an IRB approved observational cohort study of adult patients who presented to the emergency department of a Level-1 trauma center, with the primary diagnosis of TBI and a GCS score of 15 on arrival. Data collected included demographic variables such as age, gender, race, mechanisms of injury, signs and symptoms including associated vomiting, seizures, loss of consciousness (LOC), alteration of consciousness (AOC), and post-traumatic amnesia (PTA).Pre- hospital GCS, Emergency Department (ED) GCS, and results of brain CT scans were also collected as well as patient centered outcomes including hospital or intensive care unit (ICU) admission, neurosurgical intervention, and in hospital death. Data were stored in REDCap (Research Electronic Data Capture), a secure, web- based application. Descriptive and inferential analysis was done using JMP 14.0 for the Mac.
RESULTS: Univariate predictors of hospital admission included LOC, AOC, and PTA, all p < 0.0001. Patients admitted to ICU were significantly more likely to be on an antiplatelet or anticoagulant (P < 0.0001), have experienced PTA (p = 0.0025), LOC (p < 0.0001), or have an abnormal brain CT (p < 0.0001). Patients who died in the hospital were significantly more likely to be on an antiplatelet or anticoagulant (P = 0.0005. All who died in the hospital had intracranial hemorrhage on ED head CT, despite having presented to the ED with GCS of 15. Patients were also significantly more likely to have had vomiting (p < 0.0001). Patients who underwent neurosurgical intervention were significantly more likely to be male (P = 0.0203), to be on an antiplatelet or anticoagulant (P = < 0.0001) likely to have suffered their TBI from a fall (P = 0.0349), and experienced vomiting afterwards (P = 0.0193).
CONCLUSIONS: This study underscores: 1) the importance of neuroimaging in all patients with TBI, including those with a GCS 15. Fully 10% of our cohort was not imaged. Extrapolating, these would represent 2.5% bleeds, and 1.47% fractures. 2) The limitations of GCS in classifying TBI, as patients with even the mildest of mild TBI have a high frequency of gross CT abnormalities.
© The Author(s) 2019.

Entities:  

Year:  2019        PMID: 33324872      PMCID: PMC7650085          DOI: 10.1186/s42466-018-0001-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurol Res Pract        ISSN: 2524-3489


Introduction

Traumatic brain injury (TBI) accounts for over 1 million US emergency department visits annually [1], 275,000 civilian hospitalizations [2] and 21,000 military [3] injuries. Traumatic brain injury can have lasting consequences with neurocognitive deficits [4-7], post concussive symptoms [8-10], and repeat return visits to the emergency department [11]. Traumatic brain injury has traditionally been classified as mild, moderate and severe based on the Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS), a scoring system never intended to classify brain injury per se but rather level of consciousness. Developed originally in 1974 [12] then modified in 1976 [13], the GCS consists of eye opening, motor, and verbal components, for a total of 15 points. A TBI consensus workgroup points out that while the GCS can be useful in the clinical management and prognosis of TBI, it “does not provide specific information about the pathophysiologic mechanisms which are responsible for the neurologic deficits and targeted by interventions [14].” Nonetheless, this score is still widely used today. While a GCS of 13 to 15 is considered mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) per the American College of Rehabilitation Medicine [15], studies have shown that an mTBI with GCS 13 is not the same as one with GCS 15 [16]. Indeed, even in patients who have a GCS of 15, the mTBI is not always benign. This study characterizes those patients with the mildest of mTBI, as defined by a GCS of 15, and describes the acute injury features, as well as clinical outcomes.

Methods

This study is derived from a subset of data from a previously published cohort study [17] which included adult patients who presented to the emergency department (ED) of a Level-1 trauma center, over an 18-month period with the primary complaint of TBI (ascertained using ICD-9 codes of 800–804.9, 850–854, and 959.01). For the current study, the patients had to have a GCS of 15 upon ED arrival, and the injury had to have occurred within 24 h prior to presentation. Demographic variables such as age, gender, past medical history, and medications were abstracted, in addition to the mechanism of injury, and associated signs and symptoms such as vomiting, seizures, loss of consciousness (LOC), alteration of consciousness (AOC), and post- traumatic amnesia (PTA). The patient was considered to have AOC if the neurologic exam revealed a decreased mental status, or if the patient reported feeling dazed or confused or having difficulty thinking. Varibales collected are summarized in the Table 6 in Appendix. The prehospital and emergency department (ED) GCS were also recorded, as well as vital signs and computed tomography (CT) scan results. This study was approved by our Institutional Review Board. Data were stored in Research Electronic Data Capture (REDCap), a secure web-based application. Descriptive and inferential data analysis was done using JMP 14.0 for Mac.

Results

The cohort (n = 2211) was 57% male. The marital status was 61% single, 27% married, 7% divorced or separated, and 6% unknown. The median age was 37 years (IQR = 23–57), with a range of 18–101 years. Cohort demographics are summarized in Table 1.
Table 1

cohort demographics

agemedian = 37 years; IQR = 23–57; range 18–101.
gender57% male
race83% white; 14% black; 3% hispanic
marital status61% single, 27% married, 7% divorced or separated, 6% unknown
taking an anti-thrombotic agent?11% on some agent. 3% warfarin; 7% aspirin; 3% clopidogrel; < 1% each of heparin, low molecular weight heparin, aspirin-dipyridamole combination
mechanism of injuryfall 48%, motor vehicle collision 34%, assault 30%
came via ambulance?62%
cohort demographics The most common symptomatology associated with a GCS of 15 was LOC followed by PTA and AOC. The most common mechanism of injury was fall at 48%, followed by motor vehicle collision at 34%, and assault or being struck in the head at 30%. The most common location of injury reported was on the road (39%), followed by inside a home (21%). The frequency of symptoms is summarized in Fig. 1, and clinical outcomes are summarized in Fig. 2.
Fig. 1

Frequency of symptoms

Fig. 2

Frequency of Clinical Outcomes

Frequency of symptoms Frequency of Clinical Outcomes More than half the cohort (55%) reported no alcohol in the 12 h preceding the head injury, while 17% admitted to drinking, and another 27% were “unknown”. Alcohol levels were obtained in only 233 patients, or 10% of the cohort. The range was from 0 to 441, with a median of 153, and an IQR of 37–241. Interestingly, a higher alcohol level was significantly associated with not being admitted to the hospital (P < 0.0001), and did not result in any higher association with having an abnormal head CT either. The prehospital GCS was obtained for all 946 patients transported via ambulance. It ranged from 3 to 15, with a median of 15 and an interquartile range of 15–15. Thus, the majority of the patients had a prehospital GCS of 15. However, 3% had a prehospital GCS of 13, and 17% had a 14. A total of 838 patients were brought in by ambulance, while 86 were brought in by helicopter. More people brought in by helicopter (48%) vs ambulance (21%) had a prehospital GCS < 15 (P < 0.0001). Regardless, having a prehospital GCS < 15 was significantly associated with being admitted to the hospital (P < 0.001) and having an abnormal CT scan (P < 0.001). A third of the cohort (30%) were admitted to the hospital, of which 192 (29%) were admitted to the Intensive Care Unit (ICU). Univariate predictors of hospital admission included LOC, AOC, and PTA, all p < 0.0001. In multivariate analysis, only LOC and PTA retained statistical significance. Having a lower prehospital GCS was also significantly associated with being admitted to the hospital (p < 0.0001, 95% CI -0.0677 to − 0.1523). However, none of the symptoms or prehospital GCS were significantly associated with ICU admission. Compared to the general population, patients admitted to the ICU (Table 2) were significantly older, with a median age of 62 (IQR = 41–78). Patients admitted to the ICU were significantly more likely to be on an antiplatelet or anticoagulant agent (p < 0.0001, 95%CI -0.3153 to − 0.4047) with warfarin, aspirin and clopidogrel retaining independent statistical significance. Patients admitted to the ICU were also significantly more likely to have experienced PTA (p = 0.0025, 95% CI -0.0352 to − 0.1648), LOC (p < 0.0001, 95% CI -0.3282 to − 0.4318) or have an abnormal brain CT (p < 0.0001, 95% CI -0.6584 to − 0.7816).
Table 2

Factors associated with ICU admission

AgeGenderWar-farinASAPla-vixAny ACFallMVCPH GCS < 15Head CTLOCVomitPTAAOC
Total cohort minus ICU N = 2019Median 35, range 18–101, IQR 23–5457% male0, 0%106, 5%40, 2%146, 7%939 47%689 34%

160/946

17%

315, 14%212, 11%115, 6%504, 25%

153

8%

ICU

N = 192

Median 62, IQR 41–78, range 18–9559% male16, 8%42, 22%25, 13%

83

43%

122, 64%57, 30%

170

88%

95

49%

13

7%

67, 35%

65

3%

Factors associated with ICU admission 160/946 17% 153 8% ICU N = 192 83 43% 170 88% 95 49% 13 7% 65 3% Patients who died in the hospital (Table 3) were significantly more likely to be on an antiplatelet or anticoagulant agent: warfarin (P = 0.0051, 95% CI -0.042 to − 0.238), aspirin (p = 0.0005, 95% CI -0.1139 to − 0.4061), or clopidogrel (p < 0.0001, 95% CI -0.1214 to − 0.3186). All patients in the hospital death group had intracranial hemorrhage on ED head CT, despite having presented to the ED with a GCS of 15, and all but one patient also having a pre-hospital GCS of 15. Patients were also significantly more likely to have presented with vomiting (p < 0.0001, 95% CI -0.5514 to − 0.8286) and were older with a median age of 81, compared to the survivor cohort median age of 37.
Table 3

Factors associated with in-hospital death

AgeGenderWarfarinASAPlavixAny ACFallMVCPH GCS < 15Head CTLOCVomitPTAAOC
Total cohort minus in hosp death N = 2199Median 37, IQR 23–56, range 18–10157% male

59

3%

144,

7%

62,

3%

146

7%

1052

48%

744

34%

189

9%

1984,

90%

102,447%125 6%568, 26%

503

23%

Death

N = 12

Median 81, IQR 70–85, range 18–9250% male2, 17%

4

33%

3

25%

9

75%

9

75%

2

17%

1

8%

12

100%

7

58%

3

75%

3

25%

1

8%

Factors associated with in-hospital death 59 3% 144, 7% 62, 3% 146 7% 1052 48% 744 34% 189 9% 1984, 90% 503 23% Death N = 12 4 33% 3 25% 9 75% 9 75% 2 17% 1 8% 12 100% 7 58% 3 75% 3 25% 1 8% Patients who underwent neurosurgical intervention (Table 4) were significantly more likely to be male (P = 0.0203), to be on an antiplatelet or anticoagulant agent: warfarin (P = < 0.0001), aspirin (P < 0.0001), or clopidogrel (P = .0003). They were also more likely to have suffered their TBI from a fall (P = 0.0349), and experienced vomiting afterwards (P = 0.0193). Fourteen patients had their anticoagulant status reversed. 11 received IV vitamin K, 7 received both IV vitamin K and fresh frozen plasma (FFP), 2 received FFP only, and 1 received SC vitamin K.
Table 4

Factors associated with neurosurgical intervention

AgeGenderWarfarinASAPlavixAny ACFallMVCph GCS < 15Head CTLOCVomitPTAAOC

Total cohort minus surgery

N = 2158

Median 36, IQR 23–56, range 18–10156% male52, 2%137, 6%59, 3%220, 10%1028, 48%742, 34%200/917, 22%1944, 90%1016, 47%121, 6%561, 26%491, 23%

Surgery

N = 53

Median 64, IQR 41–78, range 20–8672% male9, 17%11, 21%6, 11%21, 40%33, 62%4, 8%8/20, 40%52, 98%15, 28%7, 13%10, 19%13, 25%
Factors associated with neurosurgical intervention Total cohort minus surgery N = 2158 Surgery N = 53 A total of 1996 or 90% of patients had a brain CT scan. Of these, 485 or 24% had a CT abnormality (Table 5). The frequency of specific CT abnormalities is summarized in Fig. 3. The most common CT lesions noted on CT were extra-calvarial soft tissue swelling (41%), parenchymal or hemorrhagic contusion (26%), subdural hematoma (25%), and subarachnoid hemorrhage (22%). Patients who had an abnormal CT scan were significantly more likely to be older, on an anticoagulant, and have suffered a fall as their TBI mechanism (all P < 0.001).
Table 5

Factors associated with an abnormal CT scan

AgeGenderWarfarin med = 0ASA med = 1Plavix Med = 2Any ACFallMVCph GCS < 15LOCVomitPTAAOC

CT normal

n = 1511

Median 33, IQR 22–51, range 18–9557% male30, 2%52, 3%17, 1%95, 6%678, 45%545, 36%127/639, 20%752, 50%88, 6%405, 27%297/1365, 22%

CT abnormal

n = 485

Median 59, IQR 37–77, range 18–10163% male31, 6%85, 18%45, 9%134, 28%307, 63%119, 25%84/248, 34%245, 51%34, 7%152, 31%151/481, 31%
Fig. 3

Proportion of CT findings

Factors associated with an abnormal CT scan CT normal n = 1511 CT abnormal n = 485 Proportion of CT findings

Discussion

In this observational study of emergency department presentations for patients with a GCS of 15 upon arrival, a number of findings emerge that suggest that the simple characterization of head injury by GCS score may not be sufficient. The cohort is somewhat unique in the proportion of patients who received a brain CT as part of their evaluation. Indeed, there are several rules that specifically seek to limit the use of head CT for head injury, within certain parameters. The Canadian head CT [18] rule excludes people on blood thinners, and those who had a seizure after the head injury. Also, a number of high-risk criteria have been noted with the rule, including use of blood thinners, any suspicion of skull fracture, age > 65, and a change in GCS level. Medium risk criteria including a “dangerous mechanism” is also noted as a caveat. The New Orleans head CT criteria [19] actually targets only the GCS 15 head injury population, and “suggests patients with GCS 15 and head trauma are unlikely to need a head CT as long as they do not have headache, vomiting alcohol or drug intoxication, persistent anterograde amnesia, seizure, visible trauma above the clavicles.” Clearly, neither of these rules are optimal for the mild TBI cohort in this emergency department study. Studies published years after these rules concur, suggesting that “Patients with GCS 15 and risk factors or neurological symptoms should be evaluated with CT scan, [as] the outcome of mild TBI depends on the combination of preinjury, injury and postinjury factors” [20]. CT abnormalities are in fact not uncommon in mild TBI. A study of 2766 patients with mild TBI imaged in ED found that every sixth patient (16.1%) with mild TBI had an intracranial lesion [21]. The most common lesions were subdural hematomas, subarachnoid hemorrhages, and contusions. Similar to the current study, the authors noted that a lower Glasgow Coma Scale score, male sex, older age, falls, and chronic alcohol abuse were associated with higher risk of acute intracranial lesion in patients with mild TBI. These findings underscore the heterogeneity of neuropathology associated with the mild TBI classification. Even in cases of mTBI, patients sometimes require neurosurgical intervention (NSI), as noted in the current study. In their study of mTBI patients, Tierney et al. [22] also noted that 8.2% had some form of NSI performed (including placement of an intracranial pressure monitor and other measuring devices). The in-hospital death rate for the NSI group was 13%, significantly higher than general figures for mTBI ranging from 0.3–1.8%. The use of anticoagulants as well as age being over 60 predicted a bad neurological outcome. ICU admission for mTBI, while seemingly counterintuitive, is not all that uncommon. A retrospective study of 595,171 mTBI patients in the National Trauma Data Bank found that 44.7% were admitted to an ICU, While 17.3% of these met the criteria for overtriage, as defined by: ICU stay ≤ 1 day; hospital stay ≤ 2 days; no intubation; no neurosurgery; and discharged to home [23], that still leaves 27.4% of mTBI patients who were deemed appropriate for ICU admission. Interestingly, the study noted that a common “risk factor” for overtriage included isolated subarachnoid hemorrhage.

Conclusion

This study underscores: 1) the importance of considering neuroimaging in all patients with TBI, including those with a GCS 15. In the current study, a total of 10% of the cohort was not imaged. If the CT data is extrapolated to the non-imaged group, the proportion of bleeds and fractures would be increased by 2.5 and 1.5 percentage points, respectively. 2) recognizing the limitations of GCS in classifying TBI, as patients with even the mildest of mild TBI have a high frequency of gross CT abnormalities, and non-benign outcomes including ICU admission, neurosurgical interventions and even in-hospital death.
Table 6

Study variables

Variable / Field NameField choicesN complete (out of 2211 unless noted otherwise)
ed_arrivel_dateED Arrival Datedate2211
age_in_yearsAgenumber in years2211
sexGender0, Female | 1, Male2211
raceRace0, Caucasian | 1, Black | 2, Hispanic | 3, Native American | 4, Asian | 5, Other2211
marital_statusMarital Status0, Single | 1, Married | 2, Divorced/ Separated | 3, Not known2210
employmentEmployment Status0, Not employed | 1, Employed | 2, Retired | 3, Student | 4, Not known2656
date_head_injuryDate of Head Injurydate1959
time_head_injuryTime of Head Injury0, 0–12 h ago | 1, 12–24 h ago | 2, More than 24 h ago2192
head_injury_reportingHead Injury Reporting0, Self Reported | 1, Friend/ family | 2, EMS2211
asso_vomitVomiting after injury0, No | 1, Yes2210
asso_seizureSeizures after injury0, No | 1, Yes2209
loss_consciousnessLoss of Consciousness0, No | 1, Yes | 2, Unknown2211
aocAltered Mental Status/Alteration of Consciousness (AOC)0, No | 1, Yes | 2, Unknown2211
ptaPost Traumatic Amnesia (PTA)0, No | 1, Yes | 2, Unknown2211
fallAssociation of Fall with Injury0, No | 1, Yes | 2, Unknown2211
occupationalWas this an occupational injury?0, No | 1, Yes | 2, Unknown2210
hit_struck_fall_headDid anything hit/struck/fall on head?0, No | 1, Yes | 2, Unknown2211
sportDid the injury occur while playing a sport?0, No | 1, Yes | 2, Unknown2211
recreational_activityInjury occurred during a recreational activity?0, No | 1, Yes | 2, Unknown2210
rec_vehicleWas a recreational vehicle involved?0, No | 1, Yes | 2, Unknown379/379
rec_vehicle_typeWhat type of Rec Vehicle was involved?0, Bicycle | 1, Motorcycle | 2, ATV | 3, Other | 4, Watercraft | 5, Not Known290/290
helmet_useUse of Helmet in Recreational Vehicle injury0, No | 1, Yes | 2, N/A284/290
traffic_accidentDid the Injury occur in a traffic accident?0, No | 1, Yes | 2, Unknown2211
traffic_accident_driverLocation of Patient0, Driver | 1, Front Seat Passenger | 2, Back Seat Passenger | 3, Open Air Seating | 4, Other | 5, Unknown746
seatbeltWas a seatbelt worn?0, No | 1, Yes | 2, N/A742
alcohol_bf_injuryAlcohol Consumption Prior to Injury (by Patient)0, No | 1, Yes | 2, Unknown2211
assaultedWas the patient Assaulted?0, No | 1, Yes | 2, Unknown2211
location_injury_occuredAt what location did the injury occur?0, Inside a Home | 1, Outside a home (yard/driveway) | 2, On the road | 3, “Outdoors” | 4, At Work | 5, Restaurant or Bar/Club | 6, Store | 7, Other Public Area (Park/sidewalk) | 8, Other2211
transferWas the patient transferred from another facility?0, No | 1, Yes2211
mode_transMode of Transportation0, Walk in/private vehicle | 1, Ambulance | 2, Helicopter2211
admitted_dis_orDischarged or Admitted0, Discharged | 1, Admitted2211
hlosHospital Length of Staynumber value666/666
icuICU Stay?0, No | 1, Yes666/666
icu_losICU Length of Staynumber value192/192
disch_dispositionDischarge Disposition1, routine dc| 2, rehab | 3, psych | 4, expired| 5, hospice/NH| 6, AMA| 7, law enforcement2211
in_hospital_deathIn hospital death?0, No | 1, Yes2211
prehosp_gcs_completionPre Hospital Glasgow Coma Scale Completion0, No | 1, Yes946/1381
Pre Hospital GCSnumber from 3 to 15
tbi_severity_prehospTBI Severity- Pre Hospital0, Mild | 1, Moderate | 2, Severe946/1381
ed_gcs_completionED Glasgow Coma Scale Completion0, No | 1, Yes2211
ed_gcs_score_1ED GCS Scorenumber from 3 to 152211
tbi_severity_edTBI Severity- ED0, Mild | 1, Moderate | 2, Severe2211
surgical_interventionSurgical intervention done?0, No | 1, Yes2211
ct_scanCT Scan Done?0, No | 1, Yes2211
head_ct_abmormalHead CT abnormal?0, No | 1, Yes1996/1996
ct_findingsPlease check any/all abnormalities that are observed on the CT scan:0, Extra-calvarial soft tissue swelling | 1, Fracture of skull | 2, Fracture of Maxillo-facial bones (except nose) | 3, Fracture of Nasal bones | 4, Calvarial fracture through carotid canal | 5, Calvarial fracture through foramen magnum | 6, Subfalcine herniation | 7, Upward trans-tentorial herniation | 8, Downward trans-tentorial herniation | 9, Uncal herniation | 10, Tonsillar herniation | 11, Epidural hematoma | 12, Subdural hematoma | 13, Subarachnoid hemorrhage | 14, Intraventricular hemorrhage | 15, Parenchymal or Hemorrhagic contusion | 16, Diffuse Axonal Injury (Unilateral / Bilateral)485/485
alcohol_levelAlcohol Blood Levelnumber value233
urine_drug_screenUrine Drug Screen0, Negative | 1, Positive157
arr_medsArrival Anticoagulant Medications?0, No | 1, Yes2167
med_typeMedications- Types0, Warafrin | 1, Aspirin | 2, Plavix | 3, Aggrenox | 4, Ticlid | 5, Dipyridamole | 6, Heparin | 7, Enoxaparin | 8, Dabigatran2167/2167
anticoag_rev_intAnticoagulation Reversal Intervention?0, No | 1, Yes189/242
int_typeIntervention- Type0, IV Vitamin K | 1, FFP | 2, PCC | 3, Factor IX Complex | 4, Recombinant Factor VIIa | 5, SC Vitamin K | 6, Other14/14
  18 in total

1.  Indications for computed tomography in patients with minor head injury.

Authors:  M J Haydel; C A Preston; T J Mills; S Luber; E Blaudeau; P M DeBlieux
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2000-07-13       Impact factor: 91.245

2.  The Canadian CT Head Rule for patients with minor head injury.

Authors:  I G Stiell; G A Wells; K Vandemheen; C Clement; H Lesiuk; A Laupacis; R D McKnight; R Verbeek; R Brison; D Cass; M E Eisenhauer; G Greenberg; J Worthington
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2001-05-05       Impact factor: 79.321

3.  Assessment of coma and impaired consciousness. A practical scale.

Authors:  G Teasdale; B Jennett
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1974-07-13       Impact factor: 79.321

4.  Neurosurgical intervention in patients with mild traumatic brain injury and its effect on neurological outcomes.

Authors:  Kevin James Tierney; Natasha V Nayak; Charles J Prestigiacomo; Ziad C Sifri
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  2015-09-25       Impact factor: 5.115

5.  Classification of traumatic brain injury for targeted therapies.

Authors:  Kathryn E Saatman; Ann-Christine Duhaime; Ross Bullock; Andrew I R Maas; Alex Valadka; Geoffrey T Manley
Journal:  J Neurotrauma       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 5.269

6.  Mild traumatic brain injuries in adults.

Authors:  Dhaval Shukla; B Indira Devi
Journal:  J Neurosci Rural Pract       Date:  2010-07

7.  Who gets post-concussion syndrome? An emergency department-based prospective analysis.

Authors:  Latha Ganti; Hussain Khalid; Pratik Shashikant Patel; Yasamin Daneshvar; Aakash N Bodhit; Keith R Peters
Journal:  Int J Emerg Med       Date:  2014-08-20

8.  Long-term effects of mild traumatic brain injury on cognitive performance.

Authors:  Philip J A Dean; Annette Sterr
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2013-02-12       Impact factor: 3.169

9.  TBI surveillance using the common data elements for traumatic brain injury: a population study.

Authors:  Latha Ganti Stead; Aakash N Bodhit; Pratik Shashikant Patel; Yasamin Daneshvar; Keith R Peters; Anna Mazzuoccolo; Sudeep Kuchibhotla; Christa Pulvino; Kelsey Hatchitt; Lawrence Lottenberg; Marie-Carmelle Elie-Turenne; Robyn M Hoelle; Abhijna Vedula; Andrea Gabrielli; Bayard D Miller; John H Slish; Michael Falgiani; Tricia Falgiani; J Adrian Tyndall
Journal:  Int J Emerg Med       Date:  2013-02-27

10.  Sub-classifying patients with mild traumatic brain injury: A clustering approach based on baseline clinical characteristics and 90-day and 180-day outcomes.

Authors:  Bing Si; Gina Dumkrieger; Teresa Wu; Ross Zafonte; Alex B Valadka; David O Okonkwo; Geoffrey T Manley; Lujia Wang; David W Dodick; Todd J Schwedt; Jing Li
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-07-11       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  5 in total

1.  Infected open depressed skull fracture complicated with tetanus grade I in an unimmunized child: a rare case report with literature review.

Authors:  Dzulfikar D L Hakim; Ahmad Faried; Adila Nurhadiya; Ericko H Laymena; Muhammad Z Arifin; Akhmad Imron; Iwan Abdulrachman
Journal:  Int J Emerg Med       Date:  2021-04-23

2.  A look back at 3 years of neurological research and practice (NRP).

Authors:  Werner Hacke
Journal:  Neurol Res Pract       Date:  2022-04-28

3.  An initial Glasgow Coma Scale score of 8 or less does not define severe brain injury.

Authors:  Mark Fitzgerald; Terence Tan; Jeffrey V Rosenfeld; Michael Noonan; Jin Tee; Evan Ng; Joseph Mathew; Shane Broderick; Yesul Kim; Christopher Groombridge; Andrew Udy; Biswadev Mitra
Journal:  Emerg Med Australas       Date:  2022-02-27       Impact factor: 2.279

4.  Outcomes in Patients With Mild Traumatic Brain Injury Without Acute Intracranial Traumatic Injury.

Authors:  Debbie Y Madhok; Robert M Rodriguez; Jason Barber; Nancy R Temkin; Amy J Markowitz; Natalie Kreitzer; Geoffrey T Manley
Journal:  JAMA Netw Open       Date:  2022-08-01

5.  Craniotomies following acute traumatic brain injury in Finland-a national study between 1997 and 2018.

Authors:  Nea Nevalainen; Teemu M Luoto; Grant L Iverson; Ville M Mattila; Tuomas T Huttunen
Journal:  Acta Neurochir (Wien)       Date:  2022-02-04       Impact factor: 2.816

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.